Francisco J Alvarado1, Xi Chen2, Héctor H Valdivia3. 1. Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: falvara@umich.edu. 2. Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 3. Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States; Center for Arrhythmia Research, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: hvaldiv@umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) phospho-site S2808 has been touted by the Marks group as a hallmark of heart failure (HF) and a critical mediator of the physiological fight-or-flight response of the heart. In support of this hypothesis, mice unable to undergo phosphorylation at RyR2-S2808 (S2808A) were significantly protected against HF and displayed a blunted response to adrenergic stimulation. However, the issue remains highly controversial because several groups have been unable to reproduce these findings. An important variable not considered before is the genetic background of the mice used to obtain these divergent results. METHODS AND RESULTS: We backcrossed a RyR2-S2808A mouse into a congenic C57Bl/6 strain, the same strain used by the Marks group to conduct their experiments. We then performed several key experiments to confirm or discard the genetic background of the mouse as a relevant variable, including induction of HF by myocardial infarction and tests of integrity of adrenergic response. Congenic C57Bl/6 harboring the S2808A mutation showed similar echocardiographic parameters that indicated identical progression towards HF compared to wild type controls, and had a normal response to adrenergic stimulation in whole animal and cellular experiments. CONCLUSIONS: The genetic background of the different mouse models is unlikely to be the source of the divergent results obtained by the Marks group in comparison to several other groups. Cardiac adrenergic response and progression towards HF proceed unaltered in mice harboring the RyR2-S2808A mutation. Preventing RyR2-S2808 phosphorylation does not preclude a normal sympathetic response nor mitigates the pathophysiological consequences of MI.
BACKGROUND: Phosphorylation of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) phospho-site S2808 has been touted by the Marks group as a hallmark of heart failure (HF) and a critical mediator of the physiological fight-or-flight response of the heart. In support of this hypothesis, mice unable to undergo phosphorylation at RyR2-S2808 (S2808A) were significantly protected against HF and displayed a blunted response to adrenergic stimulation. However, the issue remains highly controversial because several groups have been unable to reproduce these findings. An important variable not considered before is the genetic background of the mice used to obtain these divergent results. METHODS AND RESULTS: We backcrossed a RyR2-S2808Amouse into a congenic C57Bl/6 strain, the same strain used by the Marks group to conduct their experiments. We then performed several key experiments to confirm or discard the genetic background of the mouse as a relevant variable, including induction of HF by myocardial infarction and tests of integrity of adrenergic response. Congenic C57Bl/6 harboring the S2808A mutation showed similar echocardiographic parameters that indicated identical progression towards HF compared to wild type controls, and had a normal response to adrenergic stimulation in whole animal and cellular experiments. CONCLUSIONS: The genetic background of the different mouse models is unlikely to be the source of the divergent results obtained by the Marks group in comparison to several other groups. Cardiac adrenergic response and progression towards HF proceed unaltered in mice harboring the RyR2-S2808A mutation. Preventing RyR2-S2808 phosphorylation does not preclude a normal sympathetic response nor mitigates the pathophysiological consequences of MI.
Authors: Hongyu Zhang; Catherine A Makarewich; Hajime Kubo; Wei Wang; Jason M Duran; Ying Li; Remus M Berretta; Walter J Koch; Xiongwen Chen; Erhe Gao; Héctor H Valdivia; Steven R Houser Journal: Circ Res Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Xander H T Wehrens; Stephan E Lehnart; Steven Reiken; John A Vest; Anetta Wronska; Andrew R Marks Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-01-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Scott M MacDonnell; Gerardo García-Rivas; Joseph A Scherman; Hajime Kubo; Xiongwen Chen; Héctor Valdivia; Steven R Houser Journal: Circ Res Date: 2008-04-03 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Xi Chen; Craig Weber; Emily T Farrell; Francisco J Alvarado; Yan-Ting Zhao; Ana M Gómez; Héctor H Valdivia Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Francisco J Alvarado; J Martijn Bos; Zhiguang Yuchi; Carmen R Valdivia; Jonathan J Hernández; Yan-Ting Zhao; Dawn S Henderlong; Yan Chen; Talia R Booher; Cherisse A Marcou; Filip Van Petegem; Michael J Ackerman; Héctor H Valdivia Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-03-05
Authors: Wenli Dai; Brigitte Laforest; Leonid Tyan; Kaitlyn M Shen; Rangarajan D Nadadur; Francisco J Alvarado; Stefan R Mazurek; Sonja Lazarevic; Margaret Gadek; Yitang Wang; Ye Li; Hector H Valdivia; Le Shen; Michael T Broman; Ivan P Moskowitz; Christopher R Weber Journal: Elife Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Parisa Asghari; David Rl Scriven; Myles Ng; Pankaj Panwar; Keng C Chou; Filip van Petegem; Edwin Dw Moore Journal: Elife Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 8.140