Emma E McGinty1, Gregory Tung2, Juliana Shulman-Laniel3, Rose Hardy2, Lainie Rutkow3, Shannon Frattaroli3, Jon S Vernick3. 1. Center for Injury Research and Policy and Center for Mental Health and Addiction Policy Research, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: bmcginty@jhu.edu. 2. Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Program for Injury Prevention, Education and Research (PIPER), Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado. 3. Center for Injury Research and Policy, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes are a major cause of preventable mortality in the U.S., leading to more than 10,000 fatalities in 2013. Ignition interlocks, or alcohol-sensing devices connected to a vehicle's ignition to prevent it from starting if a driver has a predetermined blood alcohol content (BAC) level, are a promising avenue for preventing alcohol-involved driving. This study sought to assess the effects of laws requiring ignition interlocks for some or all drunk driving offenders on alcohol-involved fatal crashes. METHODS: A multilevel modeling approach assessed the effects of state interlock laws on alcohol-involved fatal crashes in the U.S. from 1982 to 2013. Monthly data on alcohol-involved crashes in each of the 50 states was collected in 2014 from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis Reporting System. Random-intercept models accounted for between-state variation in alcohol-involved fatal crash rates and autocorrelation of within-state crash rates over time. Analysis was conducted in 2015. RESULTS: State laws requiring interlocks for all drunk driving offenders were associated with a 7% decrease in the rate of BAC >0.08 fatal crashes and an 8% decrease in the rate of BAC ≥0.15 fatal crashes, translating into an estimated 1,250 prevented BAC >0.08 fatal crashes. Laws requiring interlocks for segments of high-risk drunk driving offenders, such as repeat offenders, may reduce alcohol-involved fatal crashes after 2 years of implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Ignition interlock laws reduce alcohol-involved fatal crashes. Increasing the spread of interlock laws that are mandatory for all offenders would have significant public health benefit.
INTRODUCTION:Alcohol-involved motor vehicle crashes are a major cause of preventable mortality in the U.S., leading to more than 10,000 fatalities in 2013. Ignition interlocks, or alcohol-sensing devices connected to a vehicle's ignition to prevent it from starting if a driver has a predetermined blood alcohol content (BAC) level, are a promising avenue for preventing alcohol-involved driving. This study sought to assess the effects of laws requiring ignition interlocks for some or all drunk driving offenders on alcohol-involved fatal crashes. METHODS: A multilevel modeling approach assessed the effects of state interlock laws on alcohol-involved fatal crashes in the U.S. from 1982 to 2013. Monthly data on alcohol-involved crashes in each of the 50 states was collected in 2014 from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Fatality Analysis Reporting System. Random-intercept models accounted for between-state variation in alcohol-involved fatal crash rates and autocorrelation of within-state crash rates over time. Analysis was conducted in 2015. RESULTS: State laws requiring interlocks for all drunk driving offenders were associated with a 7% decrease in the rate of BAC >0.08 fatal crashes and an 8% decrease in the rate of BAC ≥0.15 fatal crashes, translating into an estimated 1,250 prevented BAC >0.08 fatal crashes. Laws requiring interlocks for segments of high-risk drunk driving offenders, such as repeat offenders, may reduce alcohol-involved fatal crashes after 2 years of implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Ignition interlock laws reduce alcohol-involved fatal crashes. Increasing the spread of interlock laws that are mandatory for all offenders would have significant public health benefit.
Authors: Eduardo Romano; Pedro A Torres-Saavedra; Hilda I Calderón Cartagena; Robert B Voas; Anthony Ramírez Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Thomas H Nochajski; Amy R Manning; Robert Voas; Eileen P Taylor; Michael Scherer; Eduardo Romano Journal: Traffic Inj Prev Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 1.491
Authors: Robert B Voas; Anthony Scott Tippetts; Eduardo Romano; Thomas H Nochajski; Amy R Manning; Eileen Taylor; Michael Scherer Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Joyce C Pressley; Leah M Hines; Michael J Bauer; Shin Ah Oh; Joshua R Kuhl; Chang Liu; Bin Cheng; Matthew F Garnett Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 3.390