Literature DB >> 28065211

Faecal parameters as biomarkers of the equine hindgut microbial ecosystem under dietary change.

P Grimm1, C Philippeau2, V Julliand1.   

Abstract

Faeces could be used for evaluating the balance of the equine hindgut microbial ecosystem, which would offer a practical method for assessing gut health and how this relates to disease. However, previous studies concluded that faeces microbial ecosystem was not representative of the proximal hindgut (caecum and ventral colon). This study aimed to evaluate if variations of the faecal microbial ecosystem were similar to those observed in the proximal hindgut. Six horses, fistulated in the caecum and right ventral (RV) colon, were subjected to a gradual change of diet, from a 100% hay (high fibre) diet (2.2 DM kg/day per 100 kg BW) to a 57% hay+43% barley (high starch) diet (0.8 DM kg/day per 100 kg BW hay and 0.6 DM kg/day per 100 kg BW barley). The two diets were iso-energetic and fed over a 3-week trial period. Samples of digesta from the caecum, RV colon and faeces were collected two times on the 10th and 20th day of the trial, for each diet to assess the microbial ecosystem parameters by both classical culture technics and biochemical methods. The variations observed in the caecal and colonic bacterial composition (increase in total anaerobic, amylolytic and lactate-utilizing and decrease in cellulolytic bacteria concentrations) and microbial activity (changes in volatile fatty acids concentrations and increase in lactate concentrations) demonstrated that the hay+barley diet caused changes in the hindgut microbial ecosystem. Similar variations were observed in the faecal microbial ecosystem. Feeding the hay+barley diet resulted in higher concentrations of faecal lipopolysaccharides. The functional bacterial group concentrations (cellulolytics, amylolytics and lactate utilizers) were significantly correlated between caecum and faeces and between colon and faeces. From analyses of the metabolites produced from microbial activity, only valerate concentration in the caecum and the proportion of propionate were significantly correlated with the same parameters in the faeces. Results of the principal component analysis performed between all the caecal/faecal and colonic/faecal parameters revealed that the total anaerobic and cellulolytic bacteria concentrations, as well as valerate, l-lactate and lipopolysaccharide concentrations were strongly correlated with several microbial parameters in the caecum (P|0.45|) and in the colon (P|0.50|). This demonstrated that faecal samples and their bacterial analyses could be used to represent caecum and RV colon hindgut microbial ecosystem in terms of variations during a change from a high-fibre to a high-starch diet, and thus could be markers of particular interest to diagnostic proximal hindgut microbial disturbances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  faeces; hindgut; horse; lipopolysaccharides; microbiota

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28065211     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116002779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  11 in total

1.  A high-starch vs. high-fibre diet: effects on the gut environment of the different intestinal compartments of the horse digestive tract.

Authors:  Federica Raspa; Ingrid Vervuert; Maria Teresa Capucchio; Elena Colombino; Domenico Bergero; Claudio Forte; Martina Greppi; Laura Cavallarin; Marzia Giribaldi; Sara Antoniazzi; Damiano Cavallini; Ermenegildo Valvassori; Emanuela Valle
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Sequential Modulation of the Equine Fecal Microbiota and Fibrolytic Capacity Following Two Consecutive Abrupt Dietary Changes and Bacterial Supplementation.

Authors:  Axelle Collinet; Pauline Grimm; Samy Julliand; Véronique Julliand
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Domesticated equine species and their derived hybrids differ in their fecal microbiota.

Authors:  J E Edwards; A Schennink; F Burden; S Long; D A van Doorn; W F Pellikaan; J Dijkstra; E Saccenti; H Smidt
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-03-16

4.  Gut microbiota resilience in horse athletes following holidays out to pasture.

Authors:  Núria Mach; Léa Lansade; David Bars-Cortina; Sophie Dhorne-Pollet; Aline Foury; Marie-Pierre Moisan; Alice Ruet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Multidimensional Approach for Investigating the Effects of an Antibiotic-Probiotic Combination on the Equine Hindgut Ecosystem and Microbial Fibrolysis.

Authors:  Axelle Collinet; Pauline Grimm; Samy Julliand; Véronique Julliand
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Chemical composition and physical characteristics of faeces in horses with and without free faecal liquid - two case-control studies.

Authors:  K M Lindroth; J Dicksved; I Vervuert; C E Müller
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Gut microbiota features associated with Clostridioides difficile colonization in dairy calves.

Authors:  Laurel E Redding; Alexander S Berry; Nagaraju Indugu; Elizabeth Huang; Daniel P Beiting; Dipti Pitta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gut Microbiome Characteristics in feral and domesticated horses from different geographic locations.

Authors:  Li Ang; Gabriel Vinderola; Akihito Endo; Juha Kantanen; Chen Jingfeng; Ana Binetti; Patricia Burns; Shi Qingmiao; Ding Suying; Yu Zujiang; David Rios-Covian; Anastasia Mantziari; Shea Beasley; Carlos Gomez-Gallego; Miguel Gueimonde; Seppo Salminen
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-02-25

9.  Fecal microbiome of horses transitioning between warm-season and cool-season grass pasture within integrated rotational grazing systems.

Authors:  Jennifer R Weinert-Nelson; Amy S Biddle; Carey A Williams
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-06-21

10.  Changes in the faecal microbiota of horses and ponies during a two-year body weight gain programme.

Authors:  Katharina Langner; Dominique Blaue; Carola Schedlbauer; Janine Starzonek; Veronique Julliand; Ingrid Vervuert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.