Literature DB >> 28064433

MAGNETIC VT study: a prospective, multicenter, post-market randomized controlled trial comparing VT ablation outcomes using remote magnetic navigation-guided substrate mapping and ablation versus manual approach in a low LVEF population.

Luigi Di Biase1,2,3,4, Roderick Tung5, Tamás Szili-Torok6, J David Burkhardt1, Peter Weiss7, Rene Tavernier8, Adam E Berman9, Erik Wissner10, William Spear10, Xu Chen11, Petr Neužil12, Jan Skoda12, Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy13, Bruno Schwagten14, Ken Lock15, Andrea Natale16,17,18,19,20,21,22.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) are prone to scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). The success of VT ablation depends on accurate arrhythmogenic substrate localization, followed by optimal delivery of energy provided by constant electrode-tissue contact. Current manual and remote magnetic navigation (RMN)-guided ablation strategies aim to identify a reentry circuit and to target a critical isthmus through activation and entrainment mapping during ongoing tachycardia. The MAGNETIC VT trial will assess if VT ablation using the Niobe™ ES magnetic navigation system results in superior outcomes compared to a manual approach in subjects with ischemic scar VT and low ejection fraction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This is a randomized, single-blind, prospective, multicenter post-market study. A total of 386 subjects (193 per group) will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 between treatment with the Niobe ES system and treatment via a manual procedure at up to 20 sites. The study population will consist of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35% and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who have sustained monomorphic VT. The primary study endpoint is freedom from any recurrence of VT through 12 months. The secondary endpoints are acute success; freedom from any VT at 1 year in a large-scar subpopulation; procedure-related major adverse events; and mortality rate through 12-month follow-up. Follow-up will consist of visits at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, all of which will include ICD interrogation.
CONCLUSIONS: The MAGNETIC VT trial will help determine whether substrate-based ablation of VT with RMN has clinical advantages over manual catheter manipulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02637947.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Heart failure; Ischemic cardiomyopathy; Robotic magnetic navigation; Ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28064433     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-016-0217-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  14 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Endo-epicardial ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in the left ventricle with the Remote Magnetic Navigation System and the 3.5-mm open irrigated magnetic catheter: results from a large single-center case-control series.

Authors:  Luigi Di Biase; Pasquale Santangeli; Vladimir Astudillo; Sergio Conti; Prasant Mohanty; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Javier E Sanchez; Rodney Horton; Barbara Thomas; J David Burkhardt; Andrea Natale
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.

Authors:  P C O'Brien; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A standardized definition of ischemic cardiomyopathy for use in clinical research.

Authors:  G Michael Felker; Linda K Shaw; Christopher M O'Connor
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Magnetic guidance versus manual control: comparison of radiofrequency lesion dimensions and evaluation of the effect of heart wall motion in a myocardial phantom.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhaskaran; M A Tony Barry; Sara I Al Raisi; William Chik; Doan Trang Nguyen; Jim Pouliopoulos; Chrishan Nalliah; Roger Hendricks; Stuart Thomas; Alistair L McEwan; Pramesh Kovoor; Aravinda Thiagalingam
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Luigi Di Biase; Pasquale Santangeli; David J Burkhardt; Rong Bai; Prasant Mohanty; Corrado Carbucicchio; Antonio Dello Russo; Michela Casella; Sanghamitra Mohanty; Agnes Pump; Richard Hongo; Salwa Beheiry; Gemma Pelargonio; Pietro Santarelli; Martina Zucchetti; Rodney Horton; Javier E Sanchez; Claude S Elayi; Dhanunjay Lakkireddy; Claudio Tondo; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Safety and Clinical Outcome of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias Using Contact Force Sensing: Consecutive Case Series.

Authors:  Astrid Armanda Hendriks; Ferdi Akca; Lara Dabiri Abkenari; Muchtiar Khan; Rohit Bhagwandien; Sing-Chien Yap; Sip Wijchers; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-01

8.  Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs.

Authors:  John L Sapp; George A Wells; Ratika Parkash; William G Stevenson; Louis Blier; Jean-Francois Sarrazin; Bernard Thibault; Lena Rivard; Lorne Gula; Peter Leong-Sit; Vidal Essebag; Pablo B Nery; Stanley K Tung; Jean-Marc Raymond; Laurence D Sterns; George D Veenhuyzen; Jeff S Healey; Damian Redfearn; Jean-Francois Roux; Anthony S L Tang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for mapping and ablation of right ventricular outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Fengxiang Zhang; Bing Yang; Hongwu Chen; Weizhu Ju; Pipin Kojodjojo; Kejiang Cao; Minglong Chen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Kuck; Anselm Schaumann; Lars Eckardt; Stephan Willems; Rodolfo Ventura; Etienne Delacrétaz; Heinz-Friedrich Pitschner; Josef Kautzner; Burghard Schumacher; Peter S Hansen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-01-02       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Authors:  Mohit K Turagam; Donita Atkins; Roderick Tung; Moussa Mansour; Jeremy Ruskin; Jie Cheng; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Remote magnetic navigation compared to contemporary manual techniques for the catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease.

Authors:  Richard G Bennett; Timothy Campbell; Ashish Sood; Ashwin Bhaskaran; Kasun De Silva; Lloyd Davis; Pierre Qian; Gopal Sivagangabalan; Mark J Cooper; Clara K Chow; Aravinda Thiagalingam; A Robert Denniss; Stuart P Thomas; Eddy Kizana; Saurabh Kumar
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-12-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.