Zhong-Bin Zhang1, Shuang-Min Ji2, Ying Han1, Li-Li Zang1, Ying-Hui Wang1, Wei Lu2, Li Wang1, Ye Wu3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'an Men Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China. 2. School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, No.38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'an Men Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China. dryewu@263.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The study aims to establish population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models of lamotrigine (LTG) in different age groups of epileptic children by nonlinear mixed effect modelling(NONMEM), and provide essential tools and theoretical basis for individualised optimal drug dose. METHODS: Cases of 473 epileptic children were divided into infant, toddler and preschool age (≤6 years) (n = 211), school age (6-12 years) (n = 171) and adolescence age (>12 years) (n = 81). A total of 625 steady-state serum trough concentration samples were extracted. The clinical information included demography, medication, serum concentration data and blood biochemical parameters. PPK models of LTG were established by NONMEM program, using first-order absorption and elimination. Demography and drug combination was investigated for influence on apparent clearance (CL) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd). To assess the accuracy and precision of the different ages and whole-age model, the mean prediction error (MPE), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) were compared. RESULTS: The final model of LTG in different ages stage and whole age was as follows: (1) infant, toddler and preschool age CL = 0.715 × [(WEIG/16.25)0.655] × (0.458VPA) × (1.99IND), V = 10.4; (2) school age CL(L/h) = 1.01 × (WEIG/30)0.399 × 0.465VPA × 1.98IND, Vd(L) = 17.7; (3) adolescence age CL(L/h) = 1.49 × (WEIG/51.5)0.509 × 0.498VPA × 1.7IND, Vd(L) = 23.1; (4) whole age CL = 0.945 × [(WEIG/25)0.645] × (0.463VPA) × (1.94IND), V = 16.7 × (WEIG/25)0.919 (WEIG, total body weight; VPA, combination with valproate, yes = 1, no = 0; IND, combination with enzyme inducer, yes = 1, no = 0). The values of MPE, MAE and RMSE in age-stage-specific models were less than the ones in the whole-age model, which suggests the age-stage-specific models have better precision and accuracy than the whole-age model. CONCLUSION: PPK models of LTG in different age groups of epileptic children were successfully established. Weight and combination therapy were identified as significant covariates on LTG clearance. Compared with the whole-age model, the age-specific models are more reliable.
PURPOSE: The study aims to establish population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models of lamotrigine (LTG) in different age groups of epilepticchildren by nonlinear mixed effect modelling(NONMEM), and provide essential tools and theoretical basis for individualised optimal drug dose. METHODS: Cases of 473 epilepticchildren were divided into infant, toddler and preschool age (≤6 years) (n = 211), school age (6-12 years) (n = 171) and adolescence age (>12 years) (n = 81). A total of 625 steady-state serum trough concentration samples were extracted. The clinical information included demography, medication, serum concentration data and blood biochemical parameters. PPK models of LTG were established by NONMEM program, using first-order absorption and elimination. Demography and drug combination was investigated for influence on apparent clearance (CL) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd). To assess the accuracy and precision of the different ages and whole-age model, the mean prediction error (MPE), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) were compared. RESULTS: The final model of LTG in different ages stage and whole age was as follows: (1) infant, toddler and preschool age CL = 0.715 × [(WEIG/16.25)0.655] × (0.458VPA) × (1.99IND), V = 10.4; (2) school age CL(L/h) = 1.01 × (WEIG/30)0.399 × 0.465VPA × 1.98IND, Vd(L) = 17.7; (3) adolescence age CL(L/h) = 1.49 × (WEIG/51.5)0.509 × 0.498VPA × 1.7IND, Vd(L) = 23.1; (4) whole age CL = 0.945 × [(WEIG/25)0.645] × (0.463VPA) × (1.94IND), V = 16.7 × (WEIG/25)0.919 (WEIG, total body weight; VPA, combination with valproate, yes = 1, no = 0; IND, combination with enzyme inducer, yes = 1, no = 0). The values of MPE, MAE and RMSE in age-stage-specific models were less than the ones in the whole-age model, which suggests the age-stage-specific models have better precision and accuracy than the whole-age model. CONCLUSION:PPK models of LTG in different age groups of epilepticchildren were successfully established. Weight and combination therapy were identified as significant covariates on LTG clearance. Compared with the whole-age model, the age-specific models are more reliable.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chinese children; Epilepsy; Lamotrigine; Population pharmacokinetics
Authors: B B Serrano; M J García Sánchez; M J Otero; D S Buelga; J Serrano; A Domínguez-Gil Journal: J Clin Pharm Ther Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Sven C van Dijkman; Nico C B de Jager; Willem M Rauwé; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 6.447