Literature DB >> 28064346

Effects of cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortex excitability and motor function.

Antonino Naro1, Alessia Bramanti1, Antonino Leo1, Alfredo Manuli1, Francesca Sciarrone1, Margherita Russo1, Placido Bramanti1, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò2.   

Abstract

The cerebellum regulates several motor functions through two main mechanisms, the cerebellum-brain inhibition (CBI) and the motor surround inhibition (MSI). Although the exact cerebellar structures and functions involved in such processes are partially known, Purkinje cells (PC) and their surrounding interneuronal networks may play a pivotal role concerning CBI and MSI. Cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has been proven to shape specific cerebellar components in a feasible, safe, effective, and non-invasive manner. The aim of our study was to characterize the cerebellar structures and functions subtending CBI and MSI using a tACS approach. Fifteen healthy individuals underwent a cerebellar tACS protocol at 10, 50, and 300 Hz, or a sham-tACS over the right cerebellar hemisphere. We measured the tACS aftereffects on motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, CBI induced by tACS (tiCBI) at different frequencies, MSI, and hand motor task performance. None of the participants had any side effect related to tACS. After 50-Hz tACS, we observed a clear tiCBI-50Hz weakening (about +30%, p < 0.001) paralleled by a MEP amplitude increase (about +30%, p = 0.001) and a reduction of the time required to complete some motor task (about -20%, p = 0.01), lasting up to 30 min. The 300-Hz tACS induced a selective, specific tiCBI-300Hz and tiCBI-50Hz modulation in surrounding muscles (about -15%, p = 0.01) and MSI potentiation (about +40%, p < 0.001). The 10-Hz tACS and the sham-tACS were ineffective (p > 0.6). Our preliminary data suggest that PC may represent the last mediator of tiCBI and that the surrounding interneuronal network may have an important role in updating MSI, tiCBI, and M1 excitability during tonic muscle contraction, by acting onto the PC. The knowledge of these neurophysiological issues offers new cues to design innovative, non-invasive neuromodulation protocols to shape cerebellar-cerebral functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI); Cerebellum; Muscle surround inhibition (MSI); Tonic activation; Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28064346     DOI: 10.1007/s00429-016-1355-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Struct Funct        ISSN: 1863-2653            Impact factor:   3.270


  21 in total

Review 1.  Corticospinal and spinal adaptations to motor skill and resistance training: Potential mechanisms and implications for motor rehabilitation and athletic development.

Authors:  Jamie Tallent; Alex Woodhead; Ashlyn K Frazer; Jessica Hill; Dawson J Kidgell; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: Moving Towards Clinical Applications for Cerebellar and Extra-Cerebellar Disorders.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  What Do We Know About the Influence of the Cerebellum on Walking Ability? Promising Findings from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonino Naro; Demetrio Milardi; Alberto Cacciola; Margherita Russo; Francesca Sciarrone; Gianluca La Rosa; Alessia Bramanti; Placido Bramanti; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  Cerebellar Prediction and Feeding Behaviour.

Authors:  Cristiana I Iosif; Zafar I Bashir; Richard Apps; Jasmine Pickford
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 5.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: a Promising Approach for Stroke Recovery?

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 6.  New Horizons on Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Social and Affective Cerebellum.

Authors:  Z Cattaneo; C Ferrari; A Ciricugno; E Heleven; D J L G Schutter; M Manto; F Van Overwalle
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Epidural cerebellar stimulation drives widespread neural synchrony in the intact and stroke perilesional cortex.

Authors:  Aamir Abbasi; Nathan P Danielsen; Jennifer Leung; A K M G Muhammad; Saahil Patel; Tanuj Gulati
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  Mini-review: Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and the Cerebellum.

Authors:  Maximilian J Wessel; Laurijn R Draaisma; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Functional Connectivity of Vermis Correlates with Future Gait Impairments in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Baijayanta Maiti; Kerri S Rawson; Aaron B Tanenbaum; Jonathan M Koller; Abraham Z Snyder; Meghan C Campbell; Gammon M Earhart; Joel S Perlmutter
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 10.338

10.  Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Lidio Lima de Albuquerque; Milan Pantovic; Mitchell G Clingo; Katherine M Fischer; Sharon Jalene; Merrill R Landers; Zoltan Mari; Brach Poston
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.