Literature DB >> 28064193

Time indices of multiphasic development in genotypes of sweet cherry are similar from dormancy to cessation of pit growth.

David M Gibeaut1, Matthew D Whiting2, Todd Einhorn3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The archetypical double sigmoid-shaped growth curve of the sweet cherry drupe (Prunus avium) does not address critical development from eco-dormancy to anthesis and has not been correlated to reproductive bud development. Accurate representation of the growth and development of post-anthesis ovaries is confounded by anthesis timing, fruiting-density and the presence of unfertilized and defective ovaries whose growth differs from those that persist to maturation. These factors were addressed to assess pre-anthesis and full-season growth and development of three sweet cherry cultivars, 'Chelan', 'Bing' and 'Sweetheart', differing primarily in seasonal duration and fruit size.
METHODS: Volume was calculated from photographic measurements of reproductive buds, ovaries and pits at all phases of development. A population of unfertilized ovaries was produced using bee-exclusion netting to enable a statistical comparison with an open pollinated population to detect differences in size and shape between successful and failing fruit growth. Anthesis timing and fruiting-density were manipulated by floral extinction at the spur and whole-tree scales. Developmental time indices were analysed using polynomial curve fitting of log-transformed data supported by Richards and logistic functions of asymptotic growth of the pit and maturing fruit, respectively. KEY
RESULTS: Pre-anthesis growth began at the completion of eco-dormancy. A slight decline in relative growth rate (RGR) was observed during bud scale separation approx. -16 d from anthesis (DFA) before resumption of exponential growth to a maximum about 14 DFA. After anthesis, reduced growth of unfertilized or defective ovaries was partly discriminated from successful fruit at 5 DFA and completely at 25 DFA. Time indices of RGR inflections were similar among cultivars when adjusted for anthesis date alone, until the end of pit growth. Asymptotic growth of the pit underpinned the declining growth rate of fruit at the end of the first exponential growth phase. Duration of the subsequent expansive growth phase accounted for genotypic differences in seasonal duration and final size. Pit size and final fruit size were inversely related to fruiting-density.
CONCLUSIONS: Developmental differences among early, mid and late maturing cultivars were not detected until the final growth period.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prunus avium; anthesis; bud; development; dormancy; flower; fruit; growth; growth rate; maturation; phenology; pit

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28064193      PMCID: PMC5314649          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  6 in total

1.  Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rate.

Authors:  William A Hoffmann; Hendrik Poorter
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Maturity stage at harvest determines the fruit quality and antioxidant potential after storage of sweet cherry cultivars.

Authors:  María Serrano; Huertas M Díaz-Mula; Pedro Javier Zapata; Salvador Castillo; Fabián Guillén; Domingo Martínez-Romero; Juan M Valverde; Daniel Valero
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages.

Authors:  María Serrano; Fabián Guillén; Domingo Martínez-Romero; Salvador Castillo; Daniel Valero
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Identification of putative candidate genes involved in cuticle formation in Prunus avium (sweet cherry) fruit.

Authors:  Merianne Alkio; Uwe Jonas; Thorben Sprink; Steven van Nocker; Moritz Knoche
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Compositional changes in cell wall polysaccharides from five sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars during on-tree ripening.

Authors:  María F Basanta; Nora M A Ponce; María L Salum; María D Raffo; Ariel R Vicente; Rosa Erra-Balsells; Carlos A Stortz
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 5.279

6.  PacCYP707A2 negatively regulates cherry fruit ripening while PacCYP707A1 mediates drought tolerance.

Authors:  Qian Li; Pei Chen; Shengjie Dai; Yufei Sun; Bing Yuan; Wenbin Kai; Yuelin Pei; Suihuan He; Bin Liang; Yushu Zhang; Ping Leng
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 6.992

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Preanthesis changes in freeze resistance, relative water content, and ovary growth preempt bud phenology and signify dormancy release of sour cherry floral buds.

Authors:  Laura Hillmann; Mokhles Elsysy; Charity Goeckeritz; Courtney Hollender; Nikki Rothwell; Michael Blanke; Todd Einhorn
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 2.  Fruit Development in Sweet Cherry.

Authors:  Edoardo Vignati; Marzena Lipska; Jim M Dunwell; Mario Caccamo; Andrew J Simkin
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07

3.  Biomass composition explains fruit relative growth rate and discriminates climacteric from non-climacteric species.

Authors:  Léa Roch; Sylvain Prigent; Holger Klose; Coffi-Belmys Cakpo; Bertrand Beauvoit; Catherine Deborde; Laetitia Fouillen; Pierre van Delft; Daniel Jacob; Björn Usadel; Zhanwu Dai; Michel Génard; Gilles Vercambre; Sophie Colombié; Annick Moing; Yves Gibon
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.992

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.