Dio Kavalieratos1, Daniel E Siconolfi2, Karen E Steinhauser3, Janet Bull4, Robert M Arnold5, Keith M Swetz6, Arif H Kamal7. 1. Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: diok@pitt.edu. 2. Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Durham Veterans Administration and Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 4. Four Seasons, Hendersonville, North Carolina, USA. 5. Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 6. Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 7. Duke Cancer Institute and Division of Medical Oncology, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although prior surveys have identified rates of self-reported burnout among palliative care clinicians as high as 62%, limited data exist to elucidate the causes, ameliorators, and effects of this phenomenon. OBJECTIVES: We explored burnout among palliative care clinicians, specifically their experiences with burnout, their perceived sources of burnout, and potential individual, interpersonal, organizational, and policy-level solutions to address burnout. METHODS: During the 2014 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine/Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Annual Assembly, we conducted three focus groups to examine personal narratives of burnout, how burnout differs within hospice and palliative care, and strategies to mitigate burnout. Two investigators independently analyzed data using template analysis, an inductive/deductive qualitative analytic technique. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 palliative care clinicians (14 physicians, four advanced practice providers, and two social workers). Common sources of burnout included increasing workload, tensions between nonspecialists and palliative care specialists, and regulatory issues. We heard grave concerns about the stability of the palliative care workforce and concerns about providing high-quality palliative care in light of a distressed and overburdened discipline. Participants proposed antiburnout solutions, including promoting the provision of generalist palliative care, frequent rotations on-and-off service, and organizational support for self-care. We observed variability in sources of burnout between clinician type and by practice setting, such as role monotony among full-time clinicians. CONCLUSION: Our results reinforce and expand on the severity and potential ramifications of burnout on the palliative care workforce. Future research is needed to confirm our findings and investigate interventions to address or prevent burnout.
CONTEXT: Although prior surveys have identified rates of self-reported burnout among palliative care clinicians as high as 62%, limited data exist to elucidate the causes, ameliorators, and effects of this phenomenon. OBJECTIVES: We explored burnout among palliative care clinicians, specifically their experiences with burnout, their perceived sources of burnout, and potential individual, interpersonal, organizational, and policy-level solutions to address burnout. METHODS: During the 2014 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine/Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Annual Assembly, we conducted three focus groups to examine personal narratives of burnout, how burnout differs within hospice and palliative care, and strategies to mitigate burnout. Two investigators independently analyzed data using template analysis, an inductive/deductive qualitative analytic technique. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 palliative care clinicians (14 physicians, four advanced practice providers, and two social workers). Common sources of burnout included increasing workload, tensions between nonspecialists and palliative care specialists, and regulatory issues. We heard grave concerns about the stability of the palliative care workforce and concerns about providing high-quality palliative care in light of a distressed and overburdened discipline. Participants proposed antiburnout solutions, including promoting the provision of generalist palliative care, frequent rotations on-and-off service, and organizational support for self-care. We observed variability in sources of burnout between clinician type and by practice setting, such as role monotony among full-time clinicians. CONCLUSION: Our results reinforce and expand on the severity and potential ramifications of burnout on the palliative care workforce. Future research is needed to confirm our findings and investigate interventions to address or prevent burnout.
Authors: Keith M Swetz; Sarah E Harrington; Robin K Matsuyama; Tait D Shanafelt; Laurie J Lyckholm Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald Bechamps; Tom Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie Freischlag Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Sonja Boone; Litjen Tan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-10-08
Authors: Henry M Kuerer; Timothy J Eberlein; Raphael E Pollock; Mashele Huschka; Walter F Baile; Monica Morrow; Fabrizio Michelassi; S Eva Singletary; Paul Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-09-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: John D Yoon; Natalie B Hunt; Krishna C Ravella; Christine S Jun; Farr A Curlin Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; William J Gradishar; Michael Kosty; Daniel Satele; Helen Chew; Leora Horn; Ben Clark; Amy E Hanley; Quyen Chu; John Pippen; Jeff Sloan; Marilyn Raymond Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Stephanie A Kelly; Janna Stephens; Kerry Dhakal; Colleen McGovern; Sharon Tucker; Jacqueline Hoying; Kenya McRae; Samantha Ault; Elizabeth Spurlock; Steven B Bird Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2020-04-27
Authors: Danny T Y Wu; Catherine Xu; Abraham Kim; Shwetha Bindhu; Kenneth E Mah; Mark H Eckman Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Ksenia Gorbenko; Emily Franzosa; Sybil Masse; Abraham A Brody; Orla Sheehan; Bruce Kinosian; Christine S Ritchie; Bruce Leff; Jonathan Ripp; Katherine A Ornstein; Alex D Federman Journal: Home Health Care Serv Q Date: 2021-07-23
Authors: Stephanie P Schwartz; Kathryn C Adair; Jonathan Bae; Kyle J Rehder; Tait D Shanafelt; Jochen Profit; J Bryan Sexton Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 7.035