Literature DB >> 28063801

Effect of mid-follicular phase recombinant LH versus urinary HCG supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF - a prospective double-blinded randomized study.

Sze Man Jennifer Mak1, Wai Yee Wong1, Hoi Sze Chung1, Pui Wah Chung1, Grace Wing Shan Kong2, Tin Chiu Li1, Lai Ping Cheung1.   

Abstract

Luteinizing hormone (LH) is crucial for the development of follicular growth and oocyte maturation, especially in the management of poor ovarian responders (PORs). This study presents the results of a prospective double-blinded randomized study to compare the effect of mid-follicular phase recombinant LH (rLH) supplementation with urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (uHCG) supplementation when using a fixed gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in IVF cycles. A total of 49 women with poor ovarian response (POR) according to the Bologna criteria were recruited. This study showed no statistically significant difference in cycle cancellation rates, numbers of oocytes retrieved per cycle initiated, fertilization rates, the numbers of embryos obtained per cycle initiated, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, although the live birth rate per cycle initiated in the uHCG group (29.2%) was 3.6 times that of the rLH group (8.0%). Further studies are required to verify if uHCG supplementation produces better clinical outcomes compared with rLH in women with POR. Copyright Â
© 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; Live birth rate; Luteinizing hormone supplementation; Poor ovarian responder; Recombinant luteinizing hormone; Urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28063801     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  5 in total

1.  Delayed Start Protocol with Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist in Poor Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Afsoon Zarei; Mohammad Ebrahim Parsanezhad; Maryam Azizi Kutenaei; Bahia Namavar Jahromi; Parastoo Soheil Esfahani; Pardis Bakhshaei
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2018-11

2.  Minimal ovarian stimulation is an alternative to conventional protocols for older women according to Poseidon's stratification: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzolino; Gustavo Nardini Cecchino; Ernesto Bosch; Juan Antonio Garcia-Velasco; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 3.  Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective.

Authors:  Padma Rekha Jirge; Madhuri Milind Patil; Rohit Gutgutia; Jatin Shah; Mridubhashini Govindarajan; Varsha Samson Roy; Nalini Kaul-Mahajan; Faddy I Sharara
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Ming-Jer Chen; Yu-Chiao Yi; Hwa-Fen Guu; Ya-Fang Chen; Hsiao-Fan Kung; Jui-Chun Chang; Shih-Ting Chuan; Li-Yu Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 5.  hCG Triggering in ART: An Evolutionary Concept.

Authors:  Anat Hershko Klement; Adrian Shulman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.