Literature DB >> 28063727

Bloodborne pathogen exposures: Difference in reporting rates and individual predictors among health care personnel.

Cynthia Bush1, Kendra Schmid2, Mark E Rupp3, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway1, Barbara Wolford4, Uriel Sandkovsky5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Employees in health care settings are at varying risk for bloodborne pathogen (BBP) exposures. We compared differences in reporting rates of BBP exposures among health care personnel during 2 different time periods, assessing job category, years of experience, and sex as potential predictors for exposure.
METHODS: A retrospective review of the employee health department BBP database at 2 time periods (September 1, 2012-April 30, 2013, and September 1, 2013-April 30, 2014) in which 2 different reporting protocols (call center vs pager) was used. A survey was administered to assess reported and unreported exposures within a 12-month period.
RESULTS: BBP exposures were highest among residents and lowest among students. Physicians' reporting rate doubled when the call center was no longer used (relative risk, 2.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-5.52). Percutaneous injuries were the most common (78.3%), and most occurred in the operating room or postanesthesia unit (30.8%) and patient rooms (28.9%). Of 1,105 survey respondents, 103 (9.3%) recalled some type of exposure, but only 80 (77.7%) reported these exposures. When accounting for years of experience and sex, job category was significantly associated with injury or exposure within the previous 12 months (P < .001). Risk of exposure among residents was 3 times higher (odds ratio, 3.10; 95 CI, 1.60-6.00) than nurses.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk and reporting behaviors of BBP exposures vary widely across different providers. Training and education to prevent BBP exposures may need to be tailored toward different provider types.
Copyright © 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bloodborne pathogen; Occupational exposures; Percutaneous exposures

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28063727     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  4 in total

1.  Describing nurses' awareness of biological risk in delivering care for renal-dialysis patients: an Italian pilot survey.

Authors:  Cristiano Magnaghi; Rosario Caruso; Elena Brioni; Luigi Apuzzo; Marilena Galli; Cristiano Massari; Marco Del Pin; Arianna Magon; Giuseppe Vezzoli; Giulia Villa; Duilio Manara
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-03-25

2.  Occupation-Related Injuries Among Healthcare Workers: Incidence, Risk Groups, and the Effect of Training.

Authors:  Buket Erturk Sengel; Elif Tukenmez Tigen; Huseyin Bilgin; Arzu Dogru; Volkan Korten
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-06

3.  Post-vaccination anti-HBs testing among healthcare workers: More economical than post-exposure management for Hepatitis B.

Authors:  Camila Lucas de Souza; Thaís de Arvelos Salgado; Tatiana Luciano Sardeiro; Hélio Galdino Junior; Alexander Itria; Anaclara Ferreira Veiga Tipple
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2020-06-19

4.  Circumstances and Structure of Occupational Sharp Injuries among Healthcare Workers of a Selected Hospital in Central Poland.

Authors:  Anna Garus-Pakowska; Magdalena Ulrichs; Ewelina Gaszyńska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.