Dylan Wanaguru1, Catherine Langusch2, Usha Krishnan3, Vincent Varjavandi2, Ashish Jiwane2, Susan Adams2, Guy Henry2. 1. The Toby Bowring Department of Paediatric Surgery, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: d.wanaguru@yahoo.com.au. 2. The Toby Bowring Department of Paediatric Surgery, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 3. Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fundoplication has been performed almost universally in children treated with the Foker procedure (FP) for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). We report our experience with pharmacological management and endoscopic surveillance rather than early routine fundoplication in infants treated with the FP. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all children treated with the Foker procedure at our institution. RESULTS: Nine children have undergone the FP since 2007. Median time between FP and definitive anastomoses was 22days. All nine children kept their native esophagus. There were three minor anastomotic leaks, all treated nonoperatively. All children required dilatation of anastomotic strictures (range 2-15). All have been treated with proton pump inhibitors. Three children had eosinophilic esophagitis and one had Barrett's esophagus. Only two children in this series have undergone fundoplication, which was performed for symptomatic and persistent erosive esophagitis. CONCLUSION: The question of early versus delayed fundoplication in LGEA patients managed with the FP remains unanswered. Our series demonstrates that it is possible to achieve good long-term outcomes when the operation is reserved for children with gastroesophageal reflux disease resistant to maximal medical therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
BACKGROUND: Fundoplication has been performed almost universally in children treated with the Foker procedure (FP) for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). We report our experience with pharmacological management and endoscopic surveillance rather than early routine fundoplication in infants treated with the FP. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all children treated with the Foker procedure at our institution. RESULTS: Nine children have undergone the FP since 2007. Median time between FP and definitive anastomoses was 22days. All nine children kept their native esophagus. There were three minor anastomotic leaks, all treated nonoperatively. All children required dilatation of anastomotic strictures (range 2-15). All have been treated with proton pump inhibitors. Three children had eosinophilic esophagitis and one had Barrett's esophagus. Only two children in this series have undergone fundoplication, which was performed for symptomatic and persistent erosive esophagitis. CONCLUSION: The question of early versus delayed fundoplication in LGEA patients managed with the FP remains unanswered. Our series demonstrates that it is possible to achieve good long-term outcomes when the operation is reserved for children with gastroesophageal reflux disease resistant to maximal medical therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Authors: Isabelle Chumfong; Hanmin Lee; Benjamin E Padilla; Tippi C MacKenzie; Lan T Vu Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 1.827