Christopher P Salas-Wright1, Michael G Vaughn2, Lenise A Cummings-Vaughn3, Katherine J Holzer2, Erik J Nelson4, Millan AbiNader5, Sehun Oh6. 1. School of Social Work, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: cpsw@bu.edu. 2. School of Social Work, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States. 3. School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States. 4. School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States. 5. School of Social Work, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States. 6. School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent trend studies suggest that marijuana use is on the rise among the general population of adults ages 18 and older in the United States. However, little is known about the trends in marijuana use and marijuana-specific risk/protective factors among American adults during the latter part of adulthood. METHOD: Findings are based on repeated, cross-sectional data collected from late middle-aged (ages 50-64) and older adults (ages 65 and older) surveyed as part of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health between 2002 and 2014. RESULTS: The prevalence of past-year marijuana use among late middle-aged adults increased significantly from a low of 2.95% in 2003 to a high of 9.08% in 2014. Similarly, the prevalence of marijuana use increased significantly among older adults from a low of 0.15% in 2003 to a high of 2.04% in 2014. Notably, the upward trends in marijuana use remained significant even when accounting for sociodemographic, substance use, behavioral, and health-related factors. We also found that decreases in marijuana-specific protective factors were associated with the observed trend changes in marijuana use among late middle-aged and older adults, and observed a weakening of the association between late-middle aged marijuana use and risk propensity, other illicit drug use, and criminal justice system involvement over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the present study provide robust evidence indicating that marijuana use among older Americans has increased markedly in recent years, with the most evident changes observed between 2008 and 2014.
BACKGROUND: Recent trend studies suggest that marijuana use is on the rise among the general population of adults ages 18 and older in the United States. However, little is known about the trends in marijuana use and marijuana-specific risk/protective factors among American adults during the latter part of adulthood. METHOD: Findings are based on repeated, cross-sectional data collected from late middle-aged (ages 50-64) and older adults (ages 65 and older) surveyed as part of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health between 2002 and 2014. RESULTS: The prevalence of past-year marijuana use among late middle-aged adults increased significantly from a low of 2.95% in 2003 to a high of 9.08% in 2014. Similarly, the prevalence of marijuana use increased significantly among older adults from a low of 0.15% in 2003 to a high of 2.04% in 2014. Notably, the upward trends in marijuana use remained significant even when accounting for sociodemographic, substance use, behavioral, and health-related factors. We also found that decreases in marijuana-specific protective factors were associated with the observed trend changes in marijuana use among late middle-aged and older adults, and observed a weakening of the association between late-middle aged marijuana use and risk propensity, other illicit drug use, and criminal justice system involvement over the course of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from the present study provide robust evidence indicating that marijuana use among older Americans has increased markedly in recent years, with the most evident changes observed between 2008 and 2014.
Authors: Michael G Vaughn; Erik J Nelson; Christopher P Salas-Wright; Zhengmin Qian; Mario Schootman Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Christopher P Salas-Wright; Michael G Vaughn; Brian E Perron; Jennifer M Reingle Gonzalez; Trenette Clark Goings Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Wilson M Compton; Beth Han; Christopher M Jones; Carlos Blanco; Arthur Hughes Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Benjamin H Han; Scott Sherman; Pia M Mauro; Silvia S Martins; James Rotenberg; Joseph J Palamar Journal: Addiction Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Christopher P Salas-Wright; Michael G Vaughn; Jelena Todic; David Córdova; Brian E Perron Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Renee M Johnson; Brian Fairman; Tamika Gilreath; Ziming Xuan; Emily F Rothman; Taylor Parnham; C Debra M Furr-Holden Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Deborah S Hasin; Tulshi D Saha; Bradley T Kerridge; Risë B Goldstein; S Patricia Chou; Haitao Zhang; Jeesun Jung; Roger P Pickering; W June Ruan; Sharon M Smith; Boji Huang; Bridget F Grant Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Pia M Mauro; Hannah Carliner; Qiana L Brown; Deborah S Hasin; Dvora Shmulewitz; Reanne Rahim-Juwel; Aaron L Sarvet; Melanie M Wall; Silvia S Martins Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Julie Bobitt; Sara H Qualls; Melissa Schuchman; Robert Wickersham; Hillary D Lum; Kanika Arora; Gary Milavetz; Brian Kaskie Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Christopher P Salas-Wright; Jason T Carbone; Katherine J Holzer; Michael G Vaughn Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-09-18 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Christopher P Salas-Wright; Rachel John; Michael G Vaughn; Rob Eschmann; Mariana Cohen; Millan AbiNader; Jorge Delva Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Ian R Reynolds; Danielle R Fixen; Bennett L Parnes; Hillary D Lum; Prajakta Shanbhag; Skotti Church; Sunny A Linnebur; Gretchen Orosz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 5.562