Karen L Cropsey1, Peter S Hendricks2, Samantha Schiavon3, Aaron Sellers4, Morgan Froelich5, Richard C Shelton6, Matthew J Carpenter7. 1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, Sparks Center 1016, 1720 2nd Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: kcropsey@uabmc.edu. 2. University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, 227L Ryals Public Health Building, 1665 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: phendricks@uab.edu. 3. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, Sparks Center 1016, 1720 2nd Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: schiavon@uab.edu. 4. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, Sparks Center 1016, 1720 2nd Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: aaronsellers@uabmc.edu. 5. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, Sparks Center 1016, 1720 2nd Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: morganf@uab.edu. 6. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, Sparks Center 1016, 1720 2nd Ave. South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. Electronic address: rshelton@uab.mc.edu. 7. Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 67 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. Electronic address: carpente@musc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals in the criminal justice system demonstrate high rates of cigarette use (70-80%) and low adherence to smoking cessation medication. Educational approaches have not been shown to promote adherence or cessation, though medication sampling has boosted both use and cessation. The objective of the present study was to determine whether In vivo nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sampling approach increases NRT adherence among criminal justice smokers during a subsequent quit attempt. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study with 43 community corrections smokers randomized to a 4-session (one 30-min session per week) precessation intervention of either In vivo NRT sampling (Session 1: patch; Session 2: gum; Session 3: combination NRT (cNRT); Session 4: review) vs. 4 time-matched sessions of standard smoking cessation with cNRT started after Session 1. Both groups received an additional 8weeks of cNRT following the four intervention sessions. RESULTS: During the in vivo administration of NRT, total withdrawal and craving severity significantly decreased from pre- to post-session compared to Control participants. In vivo participants evinced greater patch use at Session 4 and greater gum use through Week 8 relative to Controls. DISCUSSION: In vivo NRT sampling may increase NRT adherence relative to standard counseling sessions among criminal justice smokers. A larger trial of this novel intervention appears to be warranted.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Individuals in the criminal justice system demonstrate high rates of cigarette use (70-80%) and low adherence to smoking cessation medication. Educational approaches have not been shown to promote adherence or cessation, though medication sampling has boosted both use and cessation. The objective of the present study was to determine whether In vivo nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sampling approach increases NRT adherence among criminal justice smokers during a subsequent quit attempt. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study with 43 community corrections smokers randomized to a 4-session (one 30-min session per week) precessation intervention of either In vivo NRT sampling (Session 1: patch; Session 2: gum; Session 3: combination NRT (cNRT); Session 4: review) vs. 4 time-matched sessions of standard smoking cessation with cNRT started after Session 1. Both groups received an additional 8weeks of cNRT following the four intervention sessions. RESULTS: During the in vivo administration of NRT, total withdrawal and craving severity significantly decreased from pre- to post-session compared to Control participants. In vivo participants evinced greater patch use at Session 4 and greater gum use through Week 8 relative to Controls. DISCUSSION: In vivo NRT sampling may increase NRT adherence relative to standard counseling sessions among criminal justice smokers. A larger trial of this novel intervention appears to be warranted.
Authors: Tanya R Schlam; Jessica W Cook; Timothy B Baker; Todd Hayes-Birchler; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Michael C Fiore; Megan E Piper Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Elizabeth S Hawes; Sofía Mildrum Chana; Alexandra Faust; Julianne C Baker; Peter S Hendricks; Andres Azuero; Adrienne C Lahti; Matthew J Carpenter; Karen L Cropsey Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Chelsea M Cox; Jennifer C Westrick; Danielle E McCarthy; Matthew J Carpenter; Amanda R Mathew Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2022-01 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Matthew J Carpenter; Kevin M Gray; Amy E Wahlquist; Karen Cropsey; Michael E Saladin; Brett Froeliger; Tracy T Smith; Benjamin A Toll; Jennifer Dahne Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 4.244