Literature DB >> 28063063

Identifying Candidate Reprogramming Genes in Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Fang Gao1,2, Jingyu Li2,3, Heng Zhang2, Xu Yang2, Tiezhu An4.   

Abstract

Factor-based induced reprogramming approaches have tremendous potential for human regenerative medicine, but the efficiencies of these approaches are still low. In this study, we analyzed the global transcriptional profiles of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSCs) and mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) from seven different labs and present here the first successful clustering according to cell type, not by lab of origin. We identified 2131 different expression genes (DEs) as candidate pluripotency-associated genes by comparing mESCs/miPSCs with somatic cells and 720 DEs between miPSCs and mESCs. Interestingly, there was a significant overlap between the two DE sets. Therefore, we defined the overlap DEs as "consensus DEs" including 313 miPSC-specific genes expressed at a higher level in miPSCs versus mESCs and 184 mESC-specific genes in total and reasoned that these may contribute to the differences in pluripotency between mESCs and miPSCs. A classification of "consensus DEs" according to their different expression levels between somatic cells and mESCs/miPSCs shows that 86% of the miPSC-specific genes are more highly expressed in somatic cells, while 73% of mESC-specific genes are highly expressed in mESCs/miPSCs, indicating that the miPSCs have not efficiently silenced the expression pattern of the somatic cells from which they are derived and failed to completely induce the genes with high expression levels in mESCs. We further revealed a strong correlation between oocyte-enriched factors and insufficiently induced mESC-specific genes and identified 11 hub genes via network analysis. In light of these findings, we postulated that these key hub genes might not only drive somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) reprogramming but also augment the efficiency and quality of miPSC reprogramming.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mouse embryonic stem cells; Mouse induced pluripotent stem cells; Oocyte-enrich factors; Reprogramming; Transcriptome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28063063     DOI: 10.1007/s12015-016-9704-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep        ISSN: 2629-3277            Impact factor:   5.739


  41 in total

1.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks.

Authors:  Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable.

Authors:  Tobias Brambrink; Konrad Hochedlinger; George Bell; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  rRNA genes are not fully activated in mouse somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Zhong Zheng; Jia-Lin Jia; Gerelchimeg Bou; Li-Li Hu; Zhen-Dong Wang; Xing-Hui Shen; Zhi-Yan Shan; Jing-Ling Shen; Zhong-Hua Liu; Lei Lei
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network.

Authors:  Yen-Sin Ang; Su-Yi Tsai; Dung-Fang Lee; Jonathan Monk; Jie Su; Kajan Ratnakumar; Junjun Ding; Yongchao Ge; Henia Darr; Betty Chang; Jianlong Wang; Michael Rendl; Emily Bernstein; Christoph Schaniel; Ihor R Lemischka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  MicroRNA expression profiling of human-induced pluripotent and embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Amit Sharma; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

6.  Targeted bisulfite sequencing reveals changes in DNA methylation associated with nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Robert Shoemaker; Bin Xie; Athurva Gore; Emily M LeProust; Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget; Dieter Egli; Nimet Maherali; In-Hyun Park; Junying Yu; George Q Daley; Kevin Eggan; Konrad Hochedlinger; James Thomson; Wei Wang; Yuan Gao; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state.

Authors:  Marius Wernig; Alexander Meissner; Ruth Foreman; Tobias Brambrink; Manching Ku; Konrad Hochedlinger; Bradley E Bernstein; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The gene expression profiles of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated by a non-integrating method are more similar to embryonic stem cells than those of iPSCs generated by an integrating method.

Authors:  Yajun Liu; De Cheng; Zhenzhen Li; Xing Gao; Huayan Wang
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.771

9.  Microarray analysis after RNA amplification can detect pronounced differences in gene expression using limma.

Authors:  Ilhem Diboun; Lorenz Wernisch; Christine Anne Orengo; Martin Koltzenburg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Ezh2 mediated H3K27me3 activity facilitates somatic transition during human pluripotent reprogramming.

Authors:  Radhika Arasala Rao; Narendra Dhele; Sabna Cheemadan; Alhad Ketkar; Giridhara R Jayandharan; Dasaradhi Palakodeti; Shravanti Rampalli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Meta-analysis identifies candidate key genes in endometrium as predictive biomarkers for clinical pregnancy in IVF.

Authors:  Jingyu Li; Dongyun Liu; Jiang Wang; Huali Deng; Xiu Luo; Xiaoli Shen; Yanjun Huan; Guoning Huang; Hong Ye
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.