Keith T Palmer1,2, Stefania D'Angelo1,2, E Clare Harris1,2, Cathy Linaker1,2, Catharine R Gale1,3, Maria Evandrou4, Holly Syddall1, Tjeerd van Staa5,6, Cyrus Cooper1,2, Avan Aihie Sayer1,7,8,9,10, David Coggon1,2, Karen Walker-Bone1,2. 1. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 2. Arthritis Research UK/MRC Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 3. Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 4. Centre for Research on Ageing, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 5. Farr Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 6. Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 7. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 8. Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK. 9. NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK. 10. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Demographic changes are requiring people to work longer. No previous studies, however, have focused on whether the 'frailty' phenotype (which predicts adverse events in the elderly) is associated with employment difficulties. To provide information, we assessed associations in the Health and Employment After Fifty Study, a population-based cohort of 50-65-year olds. METHODS: Subjects, who were recruited from 24 English general practices, completed a baseline questionnaire on 'prefrailty' and 'frailty' (adapted Fried criteria) and several work outcomes, including health-related job loss (HRJL), prolonged sickness absence (>20 days vs less, past 12 months), having to cut down substantially at work and difficulty coping with work's demands. Associations were assessed using logistic regression and population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated. RESULTS: In all, 3.9% of 8095 respondents were classed as 'frail' and 31.6% as 'prefrail'. Three-quarters of the former were not in work, while 60% had left their last job on health grounds (OR for HRJL vs non-frail subjects, 30.0 (95% CI 23.0 to 39.2)). Among those in work, ORs for prolonged sickness absence, cutting down substantially at work and struggling with work's physical demands ranged from 10.7 to 17.2. The PAF for HRJL when any frailty marker was present was 51.8% and that for prolonged sickness absence was 32.5%. Associations were strongest with slow reported walking speed. Several associations were stronger in manual workers than in managers. CONCLUSIONS: Fried frailty symptoms are not uncommon in mid-life and are strongly linked with economically important adverse employment outcomes. Frailty could represent an important target for prevention. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVES: Demographic changes are requiring people to work longer. No previous studies, however, have focused on whether the 'frailty' phenotype (which predicts adverse events in the elderly) is associated with employment difficulties. To provide information, we assessed associations in the Health and Employment After Fifty Study, a population-based cohort of 50-65-year olds. METHODS: Subjects, who were recruited from 24 English general practices, completed a baseline questionnaire on 'prefrailty' and 'frailty' (adapted Fried criteria) and several work outcomes, including health-related job loss (HRJL), prolonged sickness absence (>20 days vs less, past 12 months), having to cut down substantially at work and difficulty coping with work's demands. Associations were assessed using logistic regression and population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated. RESULTS: In all, 3.9% of 8095 respondents were classed as 'frail' and 31.6% as 'prefrail'. Three-quarters of the former were not in work, while 60% had left their last job on health grounds (OR for HRJL vs non-frail subjects, 30.0 (95% CI 23.0 to 39.2)). Among those in work, ORs for prolonged sickness absence, cutting down substantially at work and struggling with work's physical demands ranged from 10.7 to 17.2. The PAF for HRJL when any frailty marker was present was 51.8% and that for prolonged sickness absence was 32.5%. Associations were strongest with slow reported walking speed. Several associations were stronger in manual workers than in managers. CONCLUSIONS: Fried frailty symptoms are not uncommon in mid-life and are strongly linked with economically important adverse employment outcomes. Frailty could represent an important target for prevention. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Karen Bandeen-Roche; Qian-Li Xue; Luigi Ferrucci; Jeremy Walston; Jack M Guralnik; Paulo Chaves; Scott L Zeger; Linda P Fried Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kenneth Rockwood; Susan E Howlett; Chris MacKnight; B Lynn Beattie; Howard Bergman; Réjean Hébert; David B Hogan; Christina Wolfson; Ian McDowell Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kristine E Ensrud; Susan K Ewing; Brent C Taylor; Howard A Fink; Peggy M Cawthon; Katie L Stone; Teresa A Hillier; Jane A Cauley; Marc C Hochberg; Nicolas Rodondi; J Kathleen Tracy; Steven R Cummings Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2008-02-25
Authors: Cynthia M Boyd; Michelle Ricks; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik; Qian-Li Xue; Jin Xia; Karen Bandeen-Roche Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Keith T Palmer; Karen Walker-Bone; E Clare Harris; Cathy Linaker; Stefania D'Angelo; Avan Aihie Sayer; Catharine R Gale; Maria Evandrou; Tjeerd van Staa; Cyrus Cooper; David Coggon Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kim Bouillon; Mika Kivimaki; Mark Hamer; Severine Sabia; Eleonor I Fransson; Archana Singh-Manoux; Catharine R Gale; G David Batty Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Denis Newman-Griffis; Julia Porcino; Ayah Zirikly; Thanh Thieu; Jonathan Camacho Maldonado; Pei-Shu Ho; Min Ding; Leighton Chan; Elizabeth Rasch Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ranu Sewdas; Allard J van der Beek; Cecile R L Boot; Stefania D'Angelo; Holly E Syddall; Keith T Palmer; Karen Walker-Bone Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rozalyn L Rodwin; Yan Chen; Yutaka Yasui; Wendy M Leisenring; Todd M Gibson; Paul C Nathan; Rebecca M Howell; Kevin R Krull; Caroline Mohrmann; Robert J Hayashi; Eric J Chow; Kevin C Oeffinger; Gregory T Armstrong; Kirsten K Ness; Nina S Kadan-Lottick Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 4.090