Literature DB >> 2806234

Work tolerance and subjective responses to wearing protective clothing and respirators during physical work.

M K White, M Vercruyssen, T K Hodous.   

Abstract

This study examined work tolerance and subjective responses while performing two levels of work and wearing four types of protective ensembles. Nine males (mean age = 24.8 years, weight = 75.3 kg, VO2 max = 44.6 ml/kg min) each performed a series of eight experimental tests in random order, each lasting up to 180 min in duration. Work was performed on a motor-driven treadmill at a set walking speed and elevation which produced work intensities of either 30% or 60% of each subject's maximum aerobic capacity. Work/rest intervals were established based on anticipated SCBA refill requirements. Environmental temperature averaged 22.6 degrees C and average relative humidity was 55%. The four protective ensembles were: a control ensemble consisting of light work clothing (CONTROL); light work clothing with an open circuit self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA); firefighter's turnout gear with SCBA (FF); and chemical protective clothing with SCBA (CHEM). Test duration (tolerance time) was determined by physiological responses reaching a predetermined indicator of high stress or by a 180-min limit. Physiological and subjective measurements obtained every 2.5 min included: heart rate, skin temperature, rectal temperature, and subjective ratings of perceived exertion, thermal sensation, and perspiration. The mean tolerance times were 155, 130, 26, and 73 min, respectively, for the CONTROL, SCBA, FF, and CHEM conditions during low intensity work; and 91, 23, 4, and 13 min, respectively, during high intensity work. Differences between ensemble and work intensity were significant. FF and CHEM heart rate responses did not reach a steady state, and rose rapidly compared to CONTROL and SCBA values. SCBA heart rates remained approximately 15 beats higher than the CONTROL ensemble during the tests. At the low work intensity, mean skin temperatures at the end of the test were 32.7, 33.1, 36.7, and 36.3 degrees C, while mean core temperatures were 37.6, 37.9, 37.9, and 38.5 degrees C, respectively. The subjective data indicated that, in general, subjects were able to perceive relative degrees of physiologic strain under laboratory conditions. Wearing protective clothing and respirators results in significant and potentially dangerous thermoregulatory and cardiovascular stress to the wearer even at low work intensities in a neutral environment. Physiologically and subjectively, firefighter's turnout gear (the heaviest ensemble) produced the most stress, followed by the CHEM, SCBA, and CONTROL protective ensembles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2806234     DOI: 10.1080/00140138908966878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  The thermophysiology of uncompensable heat stress. Physiological manipulations and individual characteristics.

Authors:  S S Cheung; T M McLellan; S Tenaglia
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The effects of two kinds of mask (with or without exhaust valve) on clothing microclimates inside the mask in participants wearing protective clothing for spraying pesticides.

Authors:  C Hayashi; H Tokura
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  A fractionation of the physiological burden of the personal protective equipment worn by firefighters.

Authors:  Nigel A S Taylor; Michael C Lewis; Sean R Notley; Gregory E Peoples
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Work load and physiological responses during asbestos removal with protective clothing.

Authors:  S Rissanen; J Smolander; V Louhevaara
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Effects of training and acclimation on heat tolerance in exercising men wearing protective clothing.

Authors:  Y Aoyagi; T M McLellan; R J Shephard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

6.  Cooling vests alleviate perceptual heat strain perceived by COVID-19 nurses.

Authors:  Johannus Q de Korte; Coen C W G Bongers; Milène Catoire; Boris R M Kingma; Thijs M H Eijsvogels
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2021-01-20

7.  Acute Chemical Incidents With Injured First Responders, 2002-2012.

Authors:  Natalia Melnikova; Jennifer Wu; Alice Yang; Maureen Orr
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.385

8.  Emergency department impaired adherence to personal protective equipment donning and doffing protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Tomer Lamhoot; Noa Ben Shoshan; Hagit Eisenberg; Gilad Fainberg; Mansour Mhiliya; Neta Cohen; Orly Bisker-Kassif; Orly Barak; Carolyn Weiniger; Tali Capua
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2021-07-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.