Kristin A Harkins1, Jeffrey T Kullgren2, Scarlett L Bellamy3, Jason Karlawish1, Karen Glanz4. 1. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. VA Center for Clinical Management Research and University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: kglanz@upenn.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence that regular physical activity confers health benefits, physical activity rates among older adults remain low. Both personal and social goals may enhance older adults' motivation to become active. This study tested the effects of financial incentives, donations to charity, and the combined effects of both interventions on older adults' uptake and retention of increased levels of walking. STUDY DESIGN:RCT comparing three interventions to control. Data collection occurred from 2012 to 2013. Analyses were conducted in 2013-2016. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four adults aged ≥65 years from Philadelphia-area retirement communities. INTERVENTION: All participants received digital pedometers, walking goals of a 50% increase in daily steps, and weekly feedback on goal attainment. Participants were randomized to one of four groups: (1) Control: received weekly feedback only; (2) Financial Incentives: received payment of $20 each week walking goals were met; (3) Social Goals: received donation of $20 to a charity of choice each week walking goals were met; and (4) Combined: received $20 each week walking goals were met that could be received by participant, donated to a charity of choice, or divided between the participant and charity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean proportion of days walking goals were met during the 16-week intervention and 4-week follow-up period. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline walking, the proportion of days step goals were met during the 16-week intervention period was higher in all intervention groups versus controls (relative risk, 3.71; 95% CI=1.37, 10.01). During the 4-week follow up period, the proportion of days step goals were met did not differ in intervention groups compared to control (relative risk, 2.91; 95% CI=0.62, 13.64). CONCLUSIONS: Incentive schemes that use donations to a charity of choice, personal financial incentives, or a combination of the two can each increase older adults' initial uptake of increased levels of walking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01643538.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Despite evidence that regular physical activity confers health benefits, physical activity rates among older adults remain low. Both personal and social goals may enhance older adults' motivation to become active. This study tested the effects of financial incentives, donations to charity, and the combined effects of both interventions on older adults' uptake and retention of increased levels of walking. STUDY DESIGN: RCT comparing three interventions to control. Data collection occurred from 2012 to 2013. Analyses were conducted in 2013-2016. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four adults aged ≥65 years from Philadelphia-area retirement communities. INTERVENTION: All participants received digital pedometers, walking goals of a 50% increase in daily steps, and weekly feedback on goal attainment. Participants were randomized to one of four groups: (1) Control: received weekly feedback only; (2) Financial Incentives: received payment of $20 each week walking goals were met; (3) Social Goals: received donation of $20 to a charity of choice each week walking goals were met; and (4) Combined: received $20 each week walking goals were met that could be received by participant, donated to a charity of choice, or divided between the participant and charity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean proportion of days walking goals were met during the 16-week intervention and 4-week follow-up period. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline walking, the proportion of days step goals were met during the 16-week intervention period was higher in all intervention groups versus controls (relative risk, 3.71; 95% CI=1.37, 10.01). During the 4-week follow up period, the proportion of days step goals were met did not differ in intervention groups compared to control (relative risk, 2.91; 95% CI=0.62, 13.64). CONCLUSIONS: Incentive schemes that use donations to a charity of choice, personal financial incentives, or a combination of the two can each increase older adults' initial uptake of increased levels of walking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01643538.
Authors: Jeanne M Ferrante; Katie A Devine; Alicja Bator; Ashley Rodgers; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Elisa V Bandera; Kevin O Hwang Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Shawna L McNally; Stephanie Anzman-Frasca; Kelly Bowman; Mariana Beleche; Sara C Folta; Anjali A Patel Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Omar Galárraga; Lauren Connell Bohlen; Shira I Dunsiger; Harold H Lee; Jessica A Emerson; Holly K Boyle; Kelley Strohacker; David M Williams Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Bronwyn McGill; Blythe J O'Hara; Anne C Grunseit; Adrian Bauman; Dale Osborne; Luke Lawler; Philayrath Phongsavan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Neel P Chokshi; Srinath Adusumalli; Dylan S Small; Alexander Morris; Jordyn Feingold; Yoonhee P Ha; Marta D Lynch; Charles A L Rareshide; Victoria Hilbert; Mitesh S Patel Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 5.501