| Literature DB >> 28062025 |
Kenneth I Lim1, Kimberly Butt2, Kentia Naud3, Mila Smithies4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: OUTCOMES: EVIDENCE: A MEDLINE and KFINDER search was used to identify relevant articles, with review of bibliography identified article including Cochrane reviews and recent review articles. VALUES: The evidence collected was reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. The recommendations were made according to the guidelines developed by The Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care (Table 1). BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Amniotic fluid assessment by ultrasound has become an integral part of fetal assessment in modern obstetrics. Abnormalities of fluid volume result in obstetrical intervention and further investigations. In Canada, there are no standard definitions of fluid volume estimation, nor a standard approach to assessing fluid. Multiple randomized trials have suggested that using a Single Pocket Estimation technique (rather than the multi pocket assessment approach known as the amniotic fluid index), will result in fewer obstetrical interventions without any increase in adverse outcomes. Recent literature suggests that there are detectable, modest changes in amniotic fluid that can occur within an hour or two of normal physiological maneuvers. This may account for the variability and inconsistent results from repeated assessments within a short period of time which can lead to confusion and generate further testing. This article hopes to describe the limitations of amniotic fluid assessment, promote a standard method of amniotic fluid assessment, and propose a common set of definitions to be used to describe amniotic fluid volume. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATION.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28062025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.09.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Can ISSN: 1701-2163