Literature DB >> 28060431

The Social Value of Knowledge and the Responsiveness Requirement for International Research.

Danielle M Wenner.   

Abstract

Ethicists have long recognized that two necessary features of ethical research are scientific validity and social value. Yet despite a significant literature surrounding the validity component of this dictate, until recently there has been little attention paid to unpacking what the social value component might require. This article introduces a framework for assessing the social value of research, and in particular, for determining whether a given research program is likely to have significant social value of the kind necessary to fulfill the social value requirement. The article goes on to illustrate how this framework can provide a clearer account of the responsiveness requirement, an ethical dictum that is oft-repeated but whose content and value as a guideline in international research remains contested. Although I introduce this conception of social value in the context of the responsiveness requirement, the account offered can, and is intended to, stand alone as a tool for the assessment of the social value of research. As such it can be usefully applied to discussions about the value of comparative effectiveness trials, the assessment of the continued proliferation of me-too drugs and the research done to develop them, the demand for public access to study-generated data, and persistent deficits in the publication of negative results.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  developing world bioethics; research ethics; responsiveness; social value of research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28060431     DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  6 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in medicine: Overcoming or recapitulating structural challenges to improving patient care?

Authors:  Alex John London
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 2.  Ethically designing research to inform multidimensional, rapidly evolving policy decisions: Lessons learned from the PROMISE HIV Perinatal Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Seema K Shah; Alex John London; Lynne Mofenson; James V Lavery; Grace John-Stewart; Patricia Flynn; Gerhard Theron; Shrikhant I Bangdiwala; Dhayendre Moodley; Lameck Chinula; Lee Fairlie; Tumalano Sekoto; Tebogo J Kakhu; Avy Violari; Sufia Dadabhai; Katie McCarthy; Mary Glenn Fowler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.599

3.  Good collaborative practice: reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships.

Authors:  Claire Leonie Ward; David Shaw; Dominique Sprumont; Osman Sankoh; Marcel Tanner; Bernice Elger
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 4.  Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy.

Authors:  Euzebiusz Jamrozik; Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The Essential Role of Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs) in Ensuring the Ethics of Global Vaccine Trials to Address Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19O).

Authors:  Lisa Eckstein; Annette Rid; Dorcas Kamuya; Seema K Shah
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Collaborative partnership and the social value of clinical research: a qualitative secondary analysis.

Authors:  Sanna-Maria Nurmi; Arja Halkoaho; Mari Kangasniemi; Anna-Maija Pietilä
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.