Teun Remmers1, Carel Thijs, Anna Timperio, J O Salmon, Jenny Veitch, Stef P J Kremers, Nicola D Ridgers. 1. 1Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University (Medical Center+), Maastricht, THE NETHERLANDS; 2School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, Geelong, AUSTRALIA; and 3Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University (Medical Center+), Maastricht, THE NETHERLANDS.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Understanding how the weather affects physical activity (PA) may help in the design, analysis, and interpretation of future studies, especially when investigating PA across diverse meteorological settings and with long follow-up periods. The present longitudinal study first aims to examine the influence of daily weather elements on intraindividual PA patterns among primary school children across four seasons, reflecting day-to-day variation within each season. Second, we investigate whether the influence of weather elements differs by day of the week (weekdays vs weekends), gender, age, and body mass index. METHOD: PA data were collected by ActiGraph accelerometers for 1 wk in each of four school terms that reflect each season in southeast Australia. PA data from 307 children (age range 8.7-12.8 yr) were matched to daily meteorological variables obtained from the Australian Government's Bureau of Meteorology (maximum temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, day length, and rainfall). Daily PA patterns and their association with weather elements were analyzed using multilevel linear mixed models. RESULTS: Temperature was the strongest predictor of moderate and vigorous PA, followed by solar radiation and humidity. The relation with temperature was curvilinear, showing optimum PA levels at temperatures between 20°C and 22°C. Associations between weather elements on PA did not differ by gender, child's age, or body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: This novel study focused on the influence of weather elements on intraindividual PA patterns in children. As weather influences cannot be controlled, knowledge of its effect on individual PA patterns may help in the design of future studies, interpretation of their results, and translation into PA promotion.
INTRODUCTION: Understanding how the weather affects physical activity (PA) may help in the design, analysis, and interpretation of future studies, especially when investigating PA across diverse meteorological settings and with long follow-up periods. The present longitudinal study first aims to examine the influence of daily weather elements on intraindividual PA patterns among primary school children across four seasons, reflecting day-to-day variation within each season. Second, we investigate whether the influence of weather elements differs by day of the week (weekdays vs weekends), gender, age, and body mass index. METHOD: PA data were collected by ActiGraph accelerometers for 1 wk in each of four school terms that reflect each season in southeast Australia. PA data from 307 children (age range 8.7-12.8 yr) were matched to daily meteorological variables obtained from the Australian Government's Bureau of Meteorology (maximum temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, day length, and rainfall). Daily PA patterns and their association with weather elements were analyzed using multilevel linear mixed models. RESULTS: Temperature was the strongest predictor of moderate and vigorous PA, followed by solar radiation and humidity. The relation with temperature was curvilinear, showing optimum PA levels at temperatures between 20°C and 22°C. Associations between weather elements on PA did not differ by gender, child's age, or body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: This novel study focused on the influence of weather elements on intraindividual PA patterns in children. As weather influences cannot be controlled, knowledge of its effect on individual PA patterns may help in the design of future studies, interpretation of their results, and translation into PA promotion.
Authors: Flo Harrison; Anna Goodman; Esther M F van Sluijs; Lars Bo Andersen; Greet Cardon; Rachel Davey; Kathleen F Janz; Susi Kriemler; Lynn Molloy; Angie S Page; Russ Pate; Jardena J Puder; Luis B Sardinha; Anna Timperio; Niels Wedderkopp; Andy P Jones Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Sacha R B Verjans-Janssen; Sanne M P L Gerards; Stef P J Kremers; Steven B Vos; Maria W J Jansen; Dave H H Van Kann Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Thayse Natacha Gomes; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Sara Pereira; Mabliny Thuany; Martyn Standage; José Maia Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sandy Wong; Alejandra Cantoral; Martha María Téllez-Rojo; Ivan Pantic; Emily Oken; Katherine Svensson; Michael Dorman; Iván Gutiérrez-Avila; Johnathan Rush; Nia McRae; Robert O Wright; Andrea A Baccarelli; Itai Kloog; Allan C Just Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240