J C Junn1, K L Baugnon1, E A Lacayo2, P A Hudgins1, M R Patel3, K R Magliocca4, A S Corey1, M El-Deiry3, J T Wadsworth3, J J Beitler5, N F Saba6, Y Liu7, A H Aiken8. 1. From the Departments of Imaging Sciences (J.C.J., K.L.B., P.A.H., A.S.C., A.H.A.). 2. Department of Radiology (E.A.L.), Georgetown University, Washington, DC. 3. Otolaryngology (M.R.P., M.E.-D., J.T.W.). 4. Pathology (K.R.M.). 5. Radiation Oncology (J.J.B.). 6. Hematology Oncology (N.F.S.). 7. Statistics (Y.L.), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 8. From the Departments of Imaging Sciences (J.C.J., K.L.B., P.A.H., A.S.C., A.H.A.) Ashley.aiken@emoryhealthcare.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Extrinsic tongue muscle invasion in oral cavity cancer upstages the primary tumor to a T4a. Despite this American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criterion, no studies have investigated the accuracy or prognostic importance of radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion, the feasibility of standardizing extrinsic tongue muscle invasion reporting, or the degree of agreement across different disciplines: radiology, surgery, and pathology. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement among radiology, surgery, and pathology for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion and to determine the imaging features most predictive of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion with surgical/pathologic confirmation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with untreated primary oral cavity cancer were included. Two head and neck radiologists, 3 otolaryngologists, and 1 pathologist prospectively evaluated extrinsic tongue muscle invasion. RESULTS: Fourteen of 33 patients had radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion; however, only 8 extrinsic tongue muscle invasions were confirmed intraoperatively. Pathologists were unable to determine extrinsic tongue muscle invasion in post-formalin-fixed samples. Radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion had 100% sensitivity, 76% specificity, 57% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value with concurrent surgical-pathologic evaluation of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion as the criterion standard. On further evaluation, the imaging characteristic most consistent with surgical-pathologic evaluation positive for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion was masslike enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion is a subjective finding for all 3 disciplines. For radiology, masslike enhancement of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion most consistently corresponded to concurrent surgery/pathology evaluation positive for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion. Intraoperative surgical and pathologic evaluation should be encouraged to verify radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion to minimize unnecessary upstaging. Because this process is not routine, imaging can add value by identifying those cases most suspicious for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion, thereby prompting this more detailed evaluation by surgeons and pathologists.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Extrinsic tongue muscle invasion in oral cavity cancer upstages the primary tumor to a T4a. Despite this American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criterion, no studies have investigated the accuracy or prognostic importance of radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion, the feasibility of standardizing extrinsic tongue muscle invasion reporting, or the degree of agreement across different disciplines: radiology, surgery, and pathology. The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement among radiology, surgery, and pathology for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion and to determine the imaging features most predictive of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion with surgical/pathologic confirmation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with untreated primary oral cavity cancer were included. Two head and neck radiologists, 3 otolaryngologists, and 1 pathologist prospectively evaluated extrinsic tongue muscle invasion. RESULTS: Fourteen of 33 patients had radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion; however, only 8 extrinsic tongue muscle invasions were confirmed intraoperatively. Pathologists were unable to determine extrinsic tongue muscle invasion in post-formalin-fixed samples. Radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion had 100% sensitivity, 76% specificity, 57% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value with concurrent surgical-pathologic evaluation of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion as the criterion standard. On further evaluation, the imaging characteristic most consistent with surgical-pathologic evaluation positive for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion was masslike enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion is a subjective finding for all 3 disciplines. For radiology, masslike enhancement of extrinsic tongue muscle invasion most consistently corresponded to concurrent surgery/pathology evaluation positive for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion. Intraoperative surgical and pathologic evaluation should be encouraged to verify radiologic extrinsic tongue muscle invasion to minimize unnecessary upstaging. Because this process is not routine, imaging can add value by identifying those cases most suspicious for extrinsic tongue muscle invasion, thereby prompting this more detailed evaluation by surgeons and pathologists.
Authors: Joseph K Salama; Nabil Saba; Harry Quon; Madhur Kumar Garg; Joshua Lawson; Mark W McDonald; John A Ridge; Richard V Smith; Anamaria Reyna Yeung; Sue S Yom; Jonathan J Beitler Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Paul Lam; Kai Ming Au-Yeung; Pui Wai Cheng; William Ignace Wei; Anthony Po-Wing Yuen; Nigel Trendell-Smith; Jimmy H C Li; Raymond Li Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Michael J Thun; Lynn A G Ries; Holly L Howe; Hannah K Weir; Melissa M Center; Elizabeth Ward; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Christie Eheman; Robert Anderson; Umed A Ajani; Betsy Kohler; Brenda K Edwards Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J Madana; Frederick Laliberté; Grégoire B Morand; Deeke Yolmo; Martin J Black; Alex M Mlynarek; Michael P Hier Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2015-11-16
Authors: Mohssen Ansarin; Roberto Bruschini; Valeria Navach; Gioacchino Giugliano; Luca Calabrese; Fausto Chiesa; Jesus E Medina; Luiz P Kowalski; Jatin P Shah Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 3.147