Literature DB >> 28059516

Influence of BII Backbone Substates on DNA Twist: A Unified View and Comparison of Simulation and Experiment for All 136 Distinct Tetranucleotide Sequences.

Marie Zgarbová1, Petr Jurečka1, Filip Lankaš2, Thomas E Cheatham3, Jiří Šponer1,4, Michal Otyepka1.   

Abstract

Reliable representation of the B-DNA base-pair step twist is one of the crucial requirements for theoretical modeling of DNA supercoiling and other biologically relevant phenomena in B-DNA. It has long been suspected that the twist is inaccurately described by current empirical force fields. Unfortunately, comparison of simulation results with experiments is not straightforward because of the presence of BII backbone substates, whose populations may differ in experimental and simulation ensembles. In this work, we provide a comprehensive view of the effect of BII substates on the overall B-DNA helix twist and show how to reliably compare twist values from experiment and simulation in two scenarios. First, for longer DNA segments freely moving in solution, we show that sequence-averaged twists of different BI/BII ensembles can be compared directly because of approximate cancellation of the opposing BII effects. Second, for sequence-specific data, such as a particular base-pair step or tetranucleotide twist, can be compared only for a clearly defined BI/BII backbone conformation. For the purpose of force field testing, we designed a compact set of fourteen 22-base-pair B-DNA duplexes (Set 14) containing all 136 distinct tetranucleotide sequences and carried out a total of 84 μs of molecular dynamics simulations, primarily with the OL15 force field. Our results show that the ff99bsc0εζOL1χOL4, parmbsc1, and OL15 force fields model the B-DNA helical twist in good agreement with X-ray and minicircle ligation experiments. The comprehensive understanding obtained regarding the effect of BII substates on the base-pair step geometry should aid meaningful comparisons of various conformational ensembles in future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28059516     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  11 in total

1.  The temperature dependence of the helical twist of DNA.

Authors:  Franziska Kriegel; Christian Matek; Tomáš Dršata; Klara Kulenkampff; Sophie Tschirpke; Martin Zacharias; Filip Lankaš; Jan Lipfert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  How methyl-sugar interactions determine DNA structure and flexibility.

Authors:  Korbinian Liebl; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Framework for Conducting and Analyzing Crystal Simulations of Nucleic Acids to Aid in Modern Force Field Evaluation.

Authors:  Şölen Ekesan; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Twisting DNA by salt.

Authors:  Sergio Cruz-León; Willem Vanderlinden; Peter Müller; Tobias Forster; Georgina Staudt; Yi-Yun Lin; Jan Lipfert; Nadine Schwierz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 19.160

Review 5.  Sequence-dependent structural properties of B-DNA: what have we learned in 40 years?

Authors:  Gabriela da Rosa; Leandro Grille; Victoria Calzada; Katya Ahmad; Juan Pablo Arcon; Federica Battistini; Genís Bayarri; Thomas Bishop; Paolo Carloni; Thomas Cheatham Iii; Rosana Collepardo-Guevara; Jacek Czub; Jorge R Espinosa; Rodrigo Galindo-Murillo; Sarah A Harris; Adam Hospital; Charles Laughton; John H Maddocks; Agnes Noy; Modesto Orozco; Marco Pasi; Alberto Pérez; Daiva Petkevičiūtė-Gerlach; Rahul Sharma; Ran Sun; Pablo D Dans
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-11-13

Review 6.  The Interaction of the Metallo-Glycopeptide Anti-Tumour Drug Bleomycin with DNA.

Authors:  Vincent Murray; Jon K Chen; Long H Chung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Modulation of the helical properties of DNA: next-to-nearest neighbour effects and beyond.

Authors:  Alexandra Balaceanu; Diana Buitrago; Jürgen Walther; Adam Hospital; Pablo D Dans; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  How global DNA unwinding causes non-uniform stress distribution and melting of DNA.

Authors:  Korbinian Liebl; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The static and dynamic structural heterogeneities of B-DNA: extending Calladine-Dickerson rules.

Authors:  Pablo D Dans; Alexandra Balaceanu; Marco Pasi; Alessandro S Patelli; Daiva Petkevičiūtė; Jürgen Walther; Adam Hospital; Genís Bayarri; Richard Lavery; John H Maddocks; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Slow motions in A·T rich DNA sequence.

Authors:  A Ben Imeddourene; L Zargarian; M Buckle; B Hartmann; O Mauffret
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.