Kevin J Contrera1, Yoon K Sung2, Joshua Betz3, Lingsheng Li4, Frank R Lin3,5. 1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. 2. Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. 3. Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A. 4. University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, U.S.A. 5. Departments of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Geriatric Medicine, Mental Health and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) use on loneliness in adults. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: One hundred and thirteen adults, aged ≥ 50 years, with postlingual hearing loss and receiving routine clinical care at a tertiary academic medical center, were evaluated with the University of California at Los Angeles Loneliness Scale before and 6 and 12 months after intervention with HAs or CIs. Change in score was assessed using linear mixed effect models adjusted for age; gender; education; and history of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. RESULTS: Significant improvements in loneliness scores were observed in CI users from baseline to 6 months (-3.79 [95% confidence interval): -5.73, -1.85], P <.001) and baseline to 12 months (-3.26 [95% confidence interval: -5.66, -0.87], P =.007). We did not observe a significant improvement in loneliness scores in HA users from baseline to 6 months (-0.83 [95% confidence interval: -2.68, 1.02], P =.381) or baseline to 12 months (-0.34 [95% confidence interval: -2.77, -2.10], P = .007). The most substantial increases were observed in individuals with the lowest baseline scores. CONCLUSION: Treatment of hearing loss with CIs results in a significant reduction in loneliness symptoms. This improvement was not observed with HAs. We observed differential effects of treatment depending on the baseline loneliness score, with the greatest improvements observed in individuals with the most loneliness symptoms at baseline. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 127:1885-1889, 2017.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) use on loneliness in adults. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: One hundred and thirteen adults, aged ≥ 50 years, with postlingual hearing loss and receiving routine clinical care at a tertiary academic medical center, were evaluated with the University of California at Los Angeles Loneliness Scale before and 6 and 12 months after intervention with HAs or CIs. Change in score was assessed using linear mixed effect models adjusted for age; gender; education; and history of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking. RESULTS: Significant improvements in loneliness scores were observed in CI users from baseline to 6 months (-3.79 [95% confidence interval): -5.73, -1.85], P <.001) and baseline to 12 months (-3.26 [95% confidence interval: -5.66, -0.87], P =.007). We did not observe a significant improvement in loneliness scores in HA users from baseline to 6 months (-0.83 [95% confidence interval: -2.68, 1.02], P =.381) or baseline to 12 months (-0.34 [95% confidence interval: -2.77, -2.10], P = .007). The most substantial increases were observed in individuals with the lowest baseline scores. CONCLUSION: Treatment of hearing loss with CIs results in a significant reduction in loneliness symptoms. This improvement was not observed with HAs. We observed differential effects of treatment depending on the baseline loneliness score, with the greatest improvements observed in individuals with the most loneliness symptoms at baseline. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 127:1885-1889, 2017.
Authors: Martin Gevonden; Jan Booij; Wim van den Brink; Dennis Heijtel; Jim van Os; Jean-Paul Selten Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Marieke Pronk; Dorly J H Deeg; Cas Smits; Jos W Twisk; Theo G van Tilburg; Joost M Festen; Sophia E Kramer Journal: J Aging Health Date: 2014-04-30
Authors: Bret R Rutherford; Katharine Brewster; Justin S Golub; Ana H Kim; Steven P Roose Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Justin S Golub; Katharine K Brewster; Adam M Brickman; Adam J Ciarleglio; Ana H Kim; José A Luchsinger; Bret R Rutherford Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Katharine K Brewster; Martina Pavlicova; Alexandra Stein; Mei Chen; Chen Chen; Patrick J Brown; Steven P Roose; Ana H Kim; Justin S Golub; Adam Brickman; Jessica Galatioto; Megan Kuhlmey; Bret R Rutherford Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Justin S Golub; Katharine K Brewster; Adam M Brickman; Adam J Ciarleglio; Ana H Kim; José A Luchsinger; Bret R Rutherford Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Ahreum Lee; Caitlin McArthur; Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Monika Kastner; George Ioannidis; Lauren E Griffith; Lehana Thabane; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 2.692