Literature DB >> 28059433

A 12-week extension study to assess the safety and tolerability of naloxegol in patients with noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation.

Lynn Webster1, Raj Tummala2, Ulysses Diva3, Jaakko Lappalainen4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term safety and tolerability of naloxegol with placebo in patients with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and noncancer pain.
DESIGN: Twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase 3 extension study (KODIAC-07, NCT01395524).
SETTING: Clinical investigation centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Adult outpatients (N = 302) with confirmed OIC who had completed a 12-week pivotal phase 3 study (KODIAC-04, NCT01309841).
INTERVENTIONS: Daily oral administration of naloxegol (12.5 and 25 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events (AEs), including treatment-related AEs, serious AEs, and AEs of special interest; changes from baseline to week 12 in pain scores, daily opioid dose, and symptoms and quality-of-life measurements.
RESULTS: No important new AEs occurred during this extension study compared with KODIAC-04. AEs occurred more frequently with naloxegol 25 mg (41.2 percent) versus naloxegol 12.5 mg (34.0 percent) and placebo (33.0 percent). Treatment-emergent AEs occurring in >5 percent of patients in either naloxegol group during the treatment period were arthralgia (25 mg; 5.2 percent) and diarrhea (12.5 mg; 5.3 percent); two reported AEs attributable to opioid withdrawal syndrome in naloxegol groups were deemed unrelated to study medication. None of the gastrointestinal serious AEs was adjudicated as bowel perforation; one patient (naloxegol 12.5 mg) had an event adjudicated as a major cardiovascular event and was unrelated to study medication. Pain scores and daily opioid dose were unchanged, and improvements in symptoms and quality-of-life observed in KODIAC-04 were maintained throughout the extension study.
CONCLUSION: Naloxegol was generally safe and well tolerated in this 12-week extension study in patients with noncancer pain and OIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28059433     DOI: 10.5055/jom.2016.0360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opioid Manag        ISSN: 1551-7489


  9 in total

1.  Effects of naloxegol on whole gut transit in opioid-naïve healthy subjects receiving codeine: A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  H Halawi; P Vijayvargiya; I Busciglio; I Oduyebo; D Khemani; M Ryks; D Rhoten; D Burton; L A Szarka; A Acosta; M Camilleri
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Insights into the Use of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonists (PAMORAs) in Oncologic Patients: from Scientific Evidence to Real Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ana Fernández-Montes; Guillermo de Velasco; Santiago Aguín; Cristina Farriols; María Guirado-Risueño; Vanessa G Jerviz-Guía; María Victoria Baeza-Nadal; Rodolfo Chicas-Sett; José Luis Fírvida; Francisco García-Navalón; Patricia Martín; Carmen Perezagua-Marín; Dulce Rodríguez; Joan Santamaría; Tamara Saurí; Manuel Cobo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-02-26

3.  Blood-brain barrier: mechanisms governing permeability and interaction with peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Eugene R Viscusi; Andrew R Viscusi
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 4.  Targeting mu opioid receptors to modulate gastrointestinal function: what have we learnt so far from the studies in functional bowel disorders?

Authors:  Maura Corsetti; Jasper Pannemans; Peter Whorwell
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-05

Review 5.  The Use of Peripheral μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonists (PAMORA) in the Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation: An Update on Their Efficacy and Safety.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Paul J Christo; Jo Ann LeQuang; Peter Magnusson
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  A Prospective, Real-World, Multinational Study of Naloxegol for Patients with Cancer Pain Diagnosed with Opioid-Induced Constipation-The NACASY Study.

Authors:  Andrew Davies; Saverio Cinieri; Denis Dupoiron; Sofia España Fernandez; Johan Leclerc; Vincenzo Montesarchio; Kyriaki Mystakidou; Judith Serna; Jan Tack
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Long-term use of naldemedine in the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study.

Authors:  Lynn R Webster; Srinivas Nalamachu; Bart Morlion; Jyotsna Reddy; Yuko Baba; Tadaaki Yamada; Juan C Arjona Ferreira
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 7.926

8.  A Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective, Crossover, Open-Label Study of Factors Associated With Patient Preferences for Naloxegol or PEG 3350 for Opioid-Induced Constipation.

Authors:  Darren M Brenner; Yiqun Hu; Catherine Datto; Dana Creanga; Michael Camilleri
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 9.  Opioid-induced Constipation: A Review of Health-related Quality of Life, Patient Burden, Practical Clinical Considerations, and the Impact of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonists.

Authors:  Charles E Argoff
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.423

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.