Literature DB >> 28058773

Surgical histopathology for suspected oncocytoma on renal mass biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hiten D Patel1, Sasha C Druskin1, Steven P Rowe2, Phillip M Pierorazio1, Michael A Gorin1, Mohamad E Allaf1.   

Abstract

To estimate the proportion of oncocytic renal neoplasms diagnosed on renal mass biopsy (RMB) confirmed on surgical pathology, a systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane databases (1997 to 1 July 2016) was conducted quantifying all cases of reported oncocytic renal neoplasms on RMB suggestive of an oncocytoma. In addition, institutional data was assessed to identify additional cases. Concordance with surgical histopathology (positive predictive value [PPV]) was evaluated for patients undergoing surgery by performing a meta-analysis. In all, 10 RMB series, including institutional data, were included in the meta-analysis with 205 RMBs identifying oncocytic renal neoplasms and 46 (22.4%) proceeding to surgery. One additional study identified two neoplasms not captured by the primary RMB series for a total of 48 unique lesions included in the analysis. Surgical pathology showed oncocytoma (64.6%), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 12.5%), other RCC (12.5%), hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumour (6.3%), and other benign lesions (4.2%). PPV of oncocytoma on RMB was 67% (95% confidence interval 34-94%) with significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 71.8%, P < 0.01). Risk of bias was judged to be low for four of the 10 series. Confidently diagnosing a localised renal mass as a benign lesion, such as an oncocytoma, has implications for the ultimate management strategy a patient will undergo. RMB was found to be unreliable in confidently diagnosing a localised renal mass as an oncocytoma, with one in four found to be RCC on surgical pathology. Patients and physicians should be aware of the uncertainty in diagnosis when considering management strategies.
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biopsy; diagnostic accuracy; oncocytoma; renal cell carcinoma; renal mass

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28058773     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  21 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the differentiation of renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Yan Zhong; Haiyi Wang; Yanguang Shen; Aitao Guo; Jia Wang; Suhai Kang; Lu Ma; Jingjing Pan; Huiyi Ye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Predicting aggressive behavior in small renal tumors prior to treatment.

Authors:  Daniel D Shapiro; E Jason Abel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  [Innovative ultrasound-based diagnosis of renal tumors].

Authors:  K F Stock; J Slotta-Huspenina; H Kübler; M Autenrieth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Validation of aorta-lesion-attenuation difference on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan to differentiate between malignant and benign oncocytic renal tumors.

Authors:  Joseph R Grajo; Nikhil V Batra; Shahab Bozorgmehri; Laura L Magnelli; Jonathan Pavlinec; Padraic O'Malley; Li-Ming Su; Paul L Crispen
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-04

5.  Role of Virtual Biopsy in the Management of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Matthew S Davenport; Stuart G Silverman; Nicola Schieda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Association between nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma and the aorta-lesion-attenuation-difference.

Authors:  Joseph R Grajo; Nikhil V Batra; Shahab Bozorgmehri; Laura L Magnelli; Padraic O'Malley; Russell Terry; Li-Ming Su; Paul L Crispen
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-31

7.  Quantitative image features from radiomic biopsy differentiate oncocytoma from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Akshay Jaggi; Domenico Mastrodicasa; Gregory W Charville; R Brooke Jeffrey; Sandy Napel; Bhavik Patel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-09-07

Review 8.  Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Michael Baboudjian; Daniel Moser; Takafumi Yanagisawa; Bastien Gondran-Tellier; Eva M Compérat; Damien Ambrosetti; Laurent Daniel; Cyrille Bastide; Shahrokh F Shariat; Eric Lechevallier; Pietro Diana; Alberto Breda; Benjamin Pradere; Romain Boissier
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-19

9.  Diagnostic test accuracy of ADC values for identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mickael Tordjman; Rahul Mali; Guillaume Madelin; Vinay Prabhu; Stella K Kang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparative effectiveness of management options for patients with small renal masses: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ridwan Alam; Hiten D Patel; Tijani Osumah; Arnav Srivastava; Michael A Gorin; Michael H Johnson; Bruce J Trock; Peter Chang; Andrew A Wagner; James M McKiernan; Mohamad E Allaf; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.