Literature DB >> 28058537

In vivo efficacy of a biotherapic and eugenol formulation against Rhipicephalus microplus.

Paula Pimentel Valente1, Gustavo Henrique Ferreira Abreu Moreira2, Matheus Ferreira Serafini2, Elias Jorge Facury-Filho2, Antônio Último Carvalho2, André Augusto Gomes Faraco3, Rachel Oliveira Castilho3, Múcio Flávio Barbosa Ribeiro4.   

Abstract

The control of Rhipicephalus microplus is essential to prevent cattle discomfort and economic losses. However, increased resistance and acaricides inefficiency lead producers to adopt strategies that could result in the accumulation of chemical residues in meat and milk with possibilities of poisoning in animals and people. This scenario demonstrates the necessity of research into the identification of novel, effective and environmentally safe therapeutic options for cattle tick control. The objectives of this study were to develop and assess the efficacy of R. microplus biotherapic and of 5% eugenol for the control of R. microplus in artificially infested calves. Eighteen male 6-month-old Holstein calves were divided into three groups of six animals. In Group 1, the animals did not receive medication (control group); in Group 2, the animals received 1 mL of R. microplus biotherapic at dilution 6CH (centesimal Hahnemannian), orally administered twice daily. And in Group 3, they received a single application of eugenol 5% in the pour-on formulation. The median efficacy for biotherapy and eugenol 5% was respectively 10.13 and 13.97%; however, upon analyzing reproductive efficiency, it is noteworthy that the biotherapic had 45.86% efficiency and was superior to the action of eugenol (12.03%) after 37 days of treatment. The ultrastructural study provided information about the effects of R. microplus biotherapic on the ovaries of engorged females and showed disorganization in the deposition of the oocyte exochorion. The results suggest hatchability inhibition of larvae, interference in R. microplus reproduction and future possibilities for eco-friendly control of R. microplus with biotherapic 6CH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cattle tick; Eco-friendly control; Homeopathy; Pour on; Ultrastructure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28058537     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-016-5366-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  29 in total

1.  Morphological, histological, and ultrastructural studies of the ovary of the cattle-tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (Acari: Ixodidae).

Authors:  Kelly Cristina Saito; Gervásio Henrique Bechara; Erika Takagi Nunes; Patricia Rosa de Oliveira; Sandra Eloisi Denardi; Maria Izabel Camargo Mathias
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 2.738

2.  Evaluation of isopathic treatment of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry.

Authors:  A Berchieri; W C P Turco; J B Paiva; G H Oliveira; E V Sterzo
Journal:  Homeopathy       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 3.  Perspectives for the use of plant extracts to control the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.

Authors:  Lígia Miranda Ferreira Borges; Lorena Alessandra Dias de Sousa; Carolina da Silva Barbosa
Journal:  Rev Bras Parasitol Vet       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun

4.  In vitro acaricidal activity of Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng (Rutaceae) extracts against synthetic pyrethroid-resistant Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.

Authors:  Nirbhay Kumar Singh; Bhaskar Vemu; Harkirat Singh; Mranalini Prerna; Prashant S Daundkar; S K Sharma; V K Dumka
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Activity and chronopharmacology of very low doses of physiological immune inducers.

Authors:  M Bastide; M Doucet-Jaboeuf; V Daurat
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1985-08

Review 6.  Activity and biological effects of neem products against arthropods of medical and veterinary importance.

Authors:  M S Mulla; T Su
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.917

7.  Do homeopathic nosodes protect against infection? An experimental test.

Authors:  W B Jonas
Journal:  Altern Ther Health Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.305

8.  In vitro efficacy of extracts of Melia azedarach against the tick Boophilus microplus.

Authors:  L M F Borges; P H Ferri; W J Silva; W C Silva; J G Silva
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.739

9.  Repellent activity of eugenol on larvae of Rhipicephalus microplus and Dermacentor nitens (Acari: Ixodidae).

Authors:  Viviane Zeringóta; Tatiane Oliveira Souza Senra; Fernanda Calmon; Ralph Maturano; Aline Pasqualini Faza; Francisco Eduardo Aragão Catunda-Junior; Caio Márcio Oliveira Monteiro; Mario Geraldo de Carvalho; Erik Daemon
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Immunology and homeopathy. 3. Experimental studies on animal models.

Authors:  Paolo Bellavite; Riccardo Ortolani; Anita Conforti
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 2.629

View more
  1 in total

1.  Acaricide resistance of Rhipicephalus decoloratus ticks collected from communal grazing cattle in South Africa.

Authors:  Mandla Yawa; Nkululeko Nyangiwe; Ishmael Festus Jaja; Munyaradzi Christopher Marufu; Charles T Kadzere
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2022-01-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.