Literature DB >> 28058382

Stent versus bypass: The reasons and risk factors for early readmission to hospital after myocardial revascularization.

Murat Sargin1, Mustafa Adem Tatlisu2, Muge Tasdemir Mete1, Nehir Selcuk1, Sevinc Bayer1, Serdar Akansel1, Serap Aykut Aka1, Mehmet Eren2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Though 30-day rates of readmission for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain high, readmission rates and associated risk factors have not been well examined. The purpose of the present study was to determine the risk factors for and rates of readmission and to compare two revascularization methods on that basis.
METHODS: The study included 2664 consecutive patients who underwent coronary revascularization either with CABG surgery or PCI. The study was performed retrospectively and a wide variety of risk factors related to readmission were selected for analysis, including demographic data, preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: From the CABG group (Group 1, n=1103), 18.3% were readmitted, as were 15.2% of the PCI group (Group 2, n=1561). In multivariate analysis, age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), length of stay (>10 days), body mass index (BMI), and creatinine level on admission were associated with early readmission for group 1 (Table 3). In group 2, age, gender, LVEF, DM, length of stay (>10 days), and creatinine level on admission were associated with early readmission.
CONCLUSION: When two methods of revascularization were compared, rates of readmission were found to be similar. Patients with cited risk factors are prone to readmission in the first 30 days, so extra precautions should be taken at discharge. Neither method can be concluded to be superior with regard to readmission rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aorta-coronary bypass; percutaneous coronary intervention; readmission

Year:  2016        PMID: 28058382      PMCID: PMC5175074          DOI: 10.14744/nci.2016.43434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  North Clin Istanb        ISSN: 2536-4553


The incidence of coronary artery disease has increased, yet despite new effective medical therapies, new drug-eluted stents, and novel surgical techniques developed, the early period following revascularization after discharge is prone to many problems. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality related to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been extensively studied. The 30-day rate of readmission for both revascularization methods remains high, despite decreases in mortality [1, 2, 3]. However, readmission rates and associated risk factors have not been well examined. In particular, the two methods have not been compared with respect to early readmission. The primary objective of the present study was to determine the risk factors for and rates of readmission in the first 30 days after surgical or percutaneous revascularization. The secondary goal was to use the data to compare the two surgical methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 2664 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who underwent revascularization at the hospital either with CABG surgery or PCI between January 1 and September 1, 2013. The study was performed retrospectively and approved by the scientific board of the hospital. Of these patients, 1561 had PCI, and 1103 had CABG surgery. The patients included underwent only either CABG or PCI. Patients who died while in hospital and surviving patients who had not been discharged by postoperative day 30 were excluded. Patients who received concomitant surgeries or procedures were also excluded. In this study cohort, the goal was to identify patients who were readmitted within 30 days after discharge for a variety of complications of CABG surgery or PCI and to compare them to patients who were not readmitted within 30 days of discharge. A wide variety of potential risk factors related to readmission within 30 days, such as demographic data, preoperative risk factors and postoperative complications were selected for analysis, in addition to other variables. These included demographic data such as age and gender, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus [DM], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]), previous revascularization (PCI or CABG), length of hospital stay (1-10 days, more than 10 days) postoperative complications such as bleeding revision, intra-aortic balloon pump requirement, major complications such as sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal failure, or respiratory failure. The rates of readmission, hospitalization and risk factors were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and p value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Categorical variables are expressed as n (%), and continuous variables are expressed as mean+SD. Forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression models were created to identify the independent predictors of 30-day readmission to emergency room (ER) after myocardial revascularization. Variables with p value<0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. To estimate the impact of demographic, clinical and angiographic variables on occurrence of any cause for ER services, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis, including all variables with a univariate relationship (p<0.10).

RESULTS

The study included 2664 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease undergoing coronary revascularization, and these patients were divided into two groups: CABG group (Group 1, n=1103) and PCI group (Group 2, n=1561). A total of 440 (16.5%) of 2664 patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge following revascularization. Of the CABG group, 18.3% (n=202) were readmitted, as were 15.2% (n=238) of the PCI group. The number of patients and their baseline demographic and clinical data are presented in Figure 1 and Table 1.
FIGURE 1

Number of patients retrospectively studied in the analysis. CABG: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention.

TABLE 1

Comparison of demographic and clinical features of patients in Group 1 and in Group 2 at presentation (n=2664)

VariablesGroup 1 (n=1103)Group 2 (n=1561)p
Age (years)65.1±10.656.5±10.60.03
Male609 (55.3%)914 (58.6%)0.21
Hypertension756 (68.5%)566 (36.2%)0.02
DM286 (25.9%)276 (17.7%)0.18
COPD203 (18.4%)217 (13.9%)0.22
Hyperlipidemia330 (29.9%)374 (23.9%)0.35
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)111.2±32.2120.1±33.10.06
History of smoking551 (49.9%)858 (54.9%)0.23
Previous revascularization117 (10.6 %)219 (14.02%)0.04
EF (%) (on readmission)37.5±10.547.6±8.60.01
Creatinine (mg/dL) (on readmission)1.34±1.020.88±0.250.01
BMI>3091 (8.3%)
Length of stay>10 days103 (9.3%)96 (6.14%)0.07

BMI: Body mass index; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction.

* Parametric variables are reported in mean±SD or median (interquantile range); categorical variables are reported in number (percentage). Hypertension: Patients using medication for hypertension; DM: Patients using oral antidiabetics or insulin; Smoking: Declaration of smoking, regardless of packs/years; COPD: Use of COPD medications before or after revascularization.

Number of patients retrospectively studied in the analysis. CABG: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention. Comparison of demographic and clinical features of patients in Group 1 and in Group 2 at presentation (n=2664) BMI: Body mass index; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction. * Parametric variables are reported in mean±SD or median (interquantile range); categorical variables are reported in number (percentage). Hypertension: Patients using medication for hypertension; DM: Patients using oral antidiabetics or insulin; Smoking: Declaration of smoking, regardless of packs/years; COPD: Use of COPD medications before or after revascularization. Cardiac care prompted the readmission of 33.6% (n=148), while 66.4% (n=292) of patients were admitted for non-cardiac reasons (diabetes-associated problems, respiratory infections, non-specific). The most frequent 6 reasons for readmission for whole patient group were dysrhythmia (15.7%), nonspecific causes (15.1%), heart failure (10.2%), respiratory problems (9.8%), infection (7.2%), and vascular access site complications (6.8%). Principal reasons for readmission for Group 1 and Group 2 are presented in Table 2.
TABLE 2

Principal causes of readmission for both Group 1 and Group 2

Principal DiagnosisGroup 1 (%)Group 2 (%)
 Cardiac33.134.3
Myocardial infarction/Ischemia2.93.3
Angina pain/Chest pain3.84.2
Heart failure8.99.4
Dysrhythmia13.217.4
Postcardiotomy syndrome4.3-
 Non-Cardiac66.965.7
Incisional infections16.9-
Respiratory14.510.2
Renal2.33.4
Vascular access site complication-12.3
Other19.823.1
Nonspecific13.416.7
%100%100

BMI: Body mass index; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction.

Principal causes of readmission for both Group 1 and Group 2 BMI: Body mass index; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction. Of the readmissions, 15.38% of CABG group (n=32) and 17.2% of PCI group (n=41) were rehospitalized. The rehospitalization rate for the whole cohort was 2.7%; that is, 2.9% of all CABG patients and 2.6% of all PCI patients. The approach to treatment of complications was standard hospital policy for surgical and cardiology teams. Reasons for rehospitalization in the CABG group were primarily deep sternal infection, myocardial ischemia/infarction, and pleural effusion. For the PCI group, rehospitalization was mainly the result of myocardial ischemia/infarction, arrhythmia, and vascular access site complications. Eight (1.8% of readmissions) of the readmitted patients underwent coronary angiography. Three of the readmitted patients had another PCI, and 4 patients died (2 CABG, 2 PCI). The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of early readmission in both Group 1 and Group 2 are presented in Table 3 and 4, respectively. Variables with p value<0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model.
TABLE 3

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the predictors for early readmission in Group 1 population

Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis *


OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)p
Age1.5 (1.33-1.65)0.011.18 (1.0-1.32)0.02
Female gender1.3 (1.26-1.45)0.011.22 (1.12-1.32)0.01
Smoking1.56 (0.6-4.7)0.34--
Left ventricular EF0.7 (0.58-1.02)0.010.82 (0.61-0.99)0.03
Hypertension1.8 (0.9-4.1)0.22--
DM1.9 (1.53-2.2)0.011.4 (1.3-1.66)0.02
COPD1.3 (1.08-1.54)0.011.09 (0.96-1.28)0.04
Creatinine1.42 (1.3-1.68)0.011.16 (0.92.-1.32)0.03
BMI1.5 (1.1-1.78)0.011.18 (0.92-1.34)0.03
Previous revascularization1.8 (1.2-3.4)0.031.22 (0.9-2.34)0.12
Length of stay (>10 days)1.9 (1.43-2.7)0.011.3 (0.96-1.41)0.02

BMI: Body mass index; CI: Confidence interval; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction; OR: Odds ratio.

Variables with a p value<0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model.

†Each parameter was studied separately using multiple regression analysis. BMI: Body mass index; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction.

TABLE 4

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the predictors for early readmission in Group 2 population

Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis *


OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)p
Age1.1 (1.03-1.15)0.011.085 (1.042-1.132)0.01
Female gender1.6 (1.3-1.7)0.011.2 (1.08-1.34)0.04
Smoking1.6 (0.82-4.94)0.19
Left ventricular EF0.91 (0.88-0.94)0.010.95 (0.91-0.99)0.01
Hypertension1.64 (0.81-3.32)0.16
DM1.64 (1.43-1.72)0.011.34 (1.24-1.46)0.01
COPD1.1 (0.9-1.58)0.021.01 (0.6-1.36)0.12
Creatinine1.59 (1.32-1.74)0.011.26 (1.13-1.42)0.01
Hemoglobin0.7 (0.32-2.92)0.21
Previous revascularization1.6 (1.1-4.62)0.041.1 (0.92-2.6)0.16
Length of stay (>10 days)1.8 (1.62-2.3)0.011.2 (0.9-1.43)0.03

CI: Confidence interval COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction; OR: Odds ratio.

Variables with a p value <0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model.

†Each parameter was studied separately using multiple regression analysis.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of the predictors for early readmission in Group 1 population BMI: Body mass index; CI: Confidence interval; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction; OR: Odds ratio. Variables with a p value<0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. †Each parameter was studied separately using multiple regression analysis. BMI: Body mass index; COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the predictors for early readmission in Group 2 population CI: Confidence interval COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM: Diabetes mellitus; EF: Ejection fraction; OR: Odds ratio. Variables with a p value <0.05 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. †Each parameter was studied separately using multiple regression analysis. In multivariate analysis, age, gender, LVEF, COPD, DM, length of stay (>10 days), BMI, and creatinine level on admission (p<0.05 for each parameter) were associated with early readmission for Group 1 (Table 3). In Group 2, age, gender, LVEF, DM, length of stay (>10 days), and creatinine level on admission (p<0.05 for each parameter) were associated with early readmission (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

Although long-term results of revascularization methods have been extensively studied, knowledge of early readmission rates and causes is still limited [1-4]. The main objectives of the present study were to document the extent of 30-day readmissions after CABG surgery and PCI, to identify reasons for those readmissions, and to determine independent predictors of readmission for patients who underwent PCI and CABG surgery. The study results indicated that 16.5% of all patients, 18.3% of CABG group, and 15.2% of PCI group were readmitted within 30 days. The need for cardiac care led to readmission within 30 days of 6.1% of CABG patients and 5.3% of PCI patients. The findings were fairly similar to those of other studies. Hannan et al. studied 33936 patients who underwent CABG surgery and found that the most common reasons for readmission were post-operative infection (16.9%), heart failure (12.8%), and “other complications of surgical and medical care” (9.8%). Increased age, female sex, higher BMI, presence of more than 1 comorbidity, use of saphenous vein grafts, and longer lengths of stay were all associated with higher rates of readmission. The correlation between risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rate of hospitals and risk-adjusted in-hospital/30-day mortality rate was 0.32 (p=0.047). The range in the readmission rate across hospitals was 8.3% to 21.1% [5,6]. In another study, Hannan et al. retrospectively analyzed 30-day readmissions after PCI using statewide PCI registry to identify 40093 New York State patients who underwent PCI. A total of 15.6% of all PCI patients were readmitted within 30 days, and most common reasons for readmission were chronic ischemic heart disease (22.5%), chest pain (10.8%), and heart failure (8.2%). A total of 2015 patients (32.2% of readmissions) underwent a repeat PCI. Age over 65, female gender, low ejection fraction (EF), COPD, DM, renal failure, and longer stay in hospital after PCI were found to be risk factors [7]. Khawaja et al. reported in a study of 30-day readmission rates after PCI (15498) that overall, 9.4% of PCI patients (n=1459) were readmitted, and 0.68% (n= 106) died within 30 days after discharge. After multivariate analysis, female sex, education level below high school, unstable angina, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, moderate to severe renal disease, COPD, peptic ulcer disease, metastatic cancer, and a length of stay of more than 3 days were associated with an increased risk of 30-day readmission after PCI. Thirty-day readmission after PCI was associated with a higher risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.75; p=.009) [8]. In the present study, BMI data for the CABG group were determined to be a risk factor for readmission, usually related to incisional infection. For the PCI group, BMI data were not available for all patients; therefore, it was not included in the analysis. DM, female gender, increased age, congestive heart failure, increased creatinine level on admission, and longer lengths of stay were defined as risk factors for readmission after PCI. Gender has become an important consideration in revascularization. Female patients are known to have greater rates of morbidity and mortality [1-4]. Some studies have shown that women were readmitted more than twice as often as men within 30 days of CABG surgery [4-7,9,10]. The results of the present study also indicate that significantly more women were readmitted to hospital than men. DM is a comorbidity that almost all studies define as a risk factor for any cardiac event [4-8,11]. Similarly, we found diabetes to be a risk factor for readmission. Diabetic female patients, regardless of which procedure was performed, were readmitted to the hospital more than any other patient group. The secondary outcome of the study was a comparison of the two groups of revascularization patients in terms of readmission. Diabetes, female gender, obesity and older age were found to be risk factors for readmission for patients of both procedures. In the CABG group, females, diabetics and obese patients were readmitted to ER primarily due to infections; however, in the PCI group, the reasons were mostly non-cardiac. Multiple comorbidities, low EF, and emergency revascularization were other common risk factors for cardiac readmissions. Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass, general anesthesia and sternotomy may be primary causes of problems that lead to readmission. Similarity of risk factors for readmission in PCI and CABG groups is evidence that the surgery itself is not the only cause. Subgroups according to age (30-50 years, 50-70 years, over 70 years) were analyzed. In the PCI group, readmission was more frequent in 30-50 age group. Multivariate analysis did not reveal younger age as a risk factor for readmission. Identification of younger age as a risk factor for the PCI group needs further analysis. In our young PCI patient cohort, the most frequent reason for readmission was chest pain without electrocardiography findings. These patients were mostly diabetic. History of smoking and dyslipidemia were higher in these patients and they were often multivessel atherosclerotic patients. We believe these patients had widespread atherosclerosis aside from target vessel PCI, and these patients were more prone to be readmitted to ER for cardiac reasons. The distrıbution of number of patients who were readmitted in first 30 days is shown in Figure 2. Readmission rates were higher in the first 10 days than for the remainder of the 30-day period. This finding was similar to those in literature [4-8,11].
FIGURE 2

Days/number of readmissions.

Days/number of readmissions.

CONCLUSION

Readmission to hospital in the first 30 days after discharge is a common problem. Although we identified a number of important predictors for readmission, many variables associated with readmission remain unexplained. Future research will be needed to better understand why many patients require readmission after revascularization. When two methods of revascularization were compared, rates of readmission were found to be similar between groups. Neither method can be concluded to be superior with regard to readmission rates.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Predicting rehospitalization after bypass surgery: can we do it? Should we care?

Authors:  C Kiefe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  30-day readmission for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in New York state.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Ye Zhong; Harlan Krumholz; Gary Walford; David R Holmes; Nicholas J Stamato; Alice K Jacobs; Ferdinand J Venditti; Samin Sharma; Spencer B King
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Predictors of rehospitalization after acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Douglas L Jennings; Jill C Petricca; Leah A Yageman; Kate O'Dell; James S Kalus
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  Hospital readmissions among survivors six months after myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  B A Stanton; C D Jenkins; R L Goldstein; T J Vander Salm; M D Klein; R A Aucoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Factors associated with 30-day readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Farhan J Khawaja; Nilay D Shah; Ryan J Lennon; Joshua P Slusser; Aziz A Alkatib; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh; Victor M Montori; David R Holmes; Malcolm R Bell; Jeptha P Curtis; Harlan M Krumholz; Henry H Ting
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-28

6.  Predictors of 30-day hospital readmission after coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  R D Stewart; C T Campos; B Jennings; S S Lollis; S Levitsky; S J Lahey
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Ye Zhong; Stephen J Lahey; Alfred T Culliford; Jeffrey P Gold; Craig R Smith; Robert S D Higgins; Desmond Jordan; Andrew Wechsler
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  Hospital readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting: are women doing worse?

Authors:  Johnny Steuer; Paul Blomqvist; Fredrik Granath; Bo Rydh; Anders Ekbom; Ulf de Faire; Elisabeth Ståhle
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Predictors of readmission for complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Michael J Racz; Gary Walford; Thomas J Ryan; O Wayne Isom; Edward Bennett; Robert H Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Early readmissions after percutaneous coronary intervention in a rural tertiary care center (from the Guthrie Health Off-label Stent [GHOST] Registry).

Authors:  Kishore J Harjai; Maninder Singh; Judy Boura
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on prognosis in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Katarzyna Birkner; Bartosz Hudzik; Mariusz Gąsior
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2017-06-30

2.  Patient and hospital factors associated with 30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Md Shajedur Rahman Shawon; Michael Odutola; Michael O Falster; Louisa R Jorm
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 1.637

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.