Sonya A Mollinger1, Alberto Salleo1, Andrew J Spakowitz2. 1. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States. 2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States; Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States; Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States; Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Abstract
While transport in conjugated polymers has many similarities to that in crystalline inorganic materials, several key differences reveal the unique relationship between the morphology of polymer films and the charge mobility. We develop a model that directly incorporates the molecular properties of the polymer film and correctly predicts these unique transport features. At low degree of polymerization, the increase of the mobility with the polymer chain length reveals trapping at chain ends, and saturation of the mobility at high degree of polymerization results from conformational traps within the chains. Similarly, the inverse field dependence of the mobility reveals that transport on single polymer chains is characterized by the ability of the charge to navigate around kinks and loops in the chain. These insights emphasize the connection between the polymer conformations and the transport and thereby offer a route to designing improved device morphologies through molecular design and materials processing.
While transport in conjugated polymers has many similarities to that in crystalline inorganic materials, several key differences reveal the unique relationship between the morphology of polymer films and the charge mobility. We develop a model that directly incorporates the molecular properties of the polymer film and correctly predicts these unique transport features. At low degree of polymerization, the increase of the mobility with the polymer chain length reveals trapping at chain ends, and saturation of the mobility at high degree of polymerization results from conformational traps within the chains. Similarly, the inverse field dependence of the mobility reveals that transport on single polymer chains is characterized by the ability of the charge to navigate around kinks and loops in the chain. These insights emphasize the connection between the polymer conformations and the transport and thereby offer a route to designing improved device morphologies through molecular design and materials processing.
Conjugated polymers are a widely
researched material in the field of flexible and low-cost electronic
devices. These polymers are currently used in organic solar cells[1,2] and as the active material in thin-film organic transistors.[3,4] Transistors based on semiconducting polymers have reached mobility
values exceeding that of amorphous silicon and comparable to that
of single crystals of organic small molecules.[5,6] Unlike
inorganic or ordered organic materials, typical polymer devices are
made of semicrystalline films, which contain both significant regions
of amorphous material as well as paracrystalline regions of ordered
aggregated polymers.Several features of transport in conjugated
polymers recall properties
of inorganic amorphous semiconductors. For example, the widely observed
Poole–Frenkel effect[7,8] dictates that the mobility
μ increases exponentially with the square root of the field
strength F, i.e., μ ∼ exp(β√F), where β is a positive constant. Transport is also
temperature-activated where the mobility follows an exponential trend
in the inverse of temperature. These similarities have encouraged
researchers to leverage experimental insights and theoretical models
for inorganic amorphous semiconductors in establishing the fundamental
design principles for charge transport in conjugated polymer materials.Their macromolecular nature however makes conjugated polymers fundamentally
different from amorphous inorganic semiconductors. The ubiquitous
presence of polymers in a broad spectrum of materials applications
is driven by desirable properties that directly arise from macromolecular
structural features. Polymer entanglement at large molecular weight
is well-exploited when controlling the mechanical properties of plastics[9] and the flow properties of polymeric fluids.
Block copolymers self-assemble into ordered microphase structures
with feature size that is controlled by molecular weight. Such self-assembled
morphologies are exploited for nanoscale lithography for electronic
and optical devices and for nanoparticle synthesis. All living things
are composed of polymeric materials with exquisite molecular organization
and functional capabilities that are dictated by the linkage of chemically
diverse amino acids into chains. There exist many approaches to controlling
molecular organization within such polymeric materials for desirable
properties.It is not surprising that some features of charge
transport in
conjugated polymers are unique to this family of materials. The mobility
in general increases nonlinearly with the degree of polymerization
of the polymer. Furthermore, a number of experimental data sets demonstrate
that at low fields the Poole–Frenkel effect disappears or even
inverts.[10−13]We posit that these phenomena reflect the nature of charge
transport
along a polymer chain and are therefore an expression of the macromolecular
nature of the material. We demonstrate that the key physical process
controlling mobility is the capacity for a charge to navigate around
traps. We simulate the mobility using polymer conformations to describe
the intercrystallite amorphous regions and offer explanations of observed
trends. Our work shows how the interplay between polymer conformations
and charge transport gives rise to unique behaviors. Polymer science
has established a wealth of approaches to controlling conformational
properties in polymeric materials using thermodynamic and processing
techniques. Thus, insights from our model can be exploited for the
design and processing of new materials with improved transport by
providing a direct connection between the polymer conformational properties
and the device-scale performance.The π-conjugation within
conjugated polymers results in chains
with considerable structural rigidity. Thus, the conformational properties
of conjugated polymers can be modeled using the wormlike chain model.[14,15] The chains are discretized into beads that represent monomers with
length l0, and the bending rigidity is
dictated by the persistence length lp.
The bending angles are determined from the wormlike chain model probability
distribution.[16] The resulting conformation
is defined by the bead positions r⃗, where i runs from 1 to the number
of beads N.We assume that a charge is localized
on a single bead and is capable
of hopping to either of the neighboring beads or off to a neighboring
chain.[16] The hopping rates are determined
by Marcus theory.[17] A charge q within a field of magnitude F in the z-direction
experiences an energy difference ΔG between sites i and j, given bywhere z = r⃗ ·ẑ. The hopping rate from site i to
site i + 1 along a single chain iswhere J0 is the electronic coupling between
beads, λ0 is the reorganization energy, and ℏ
is the reduced Planck’s
constant. Each site can also couple to a site on a different chain,
with a rate khop determined by the interchain
electronic coupling Jhop and reorganization
energy λhop. We assume a constant energy difference
Δhop = Fqγl0 for interchain transfer, where γ
is the ratio between the interchain hop distance and the segment length l0.Our dynamic Monte Carlo algorithm for
amorphous charge transport
bridges the single-chain behavior to charge transport within an amorphous
region within a semicrystalline material (see Supporting Information for details). The charge takes a series
of steps along a chain and between chains with the respective hopping
rates. If the charge hops off the chain in the amorphous region, a
new chain is generated. This procedure continues until the charge
reaches a crystal. The goal in our model is to capture chain conformations
as the pathways for charge transport, and other contributions, such
as energetic disorder and conjugation-length heterogeneity, can be
introduced later as refinements.Our amorphous model acts as
input to a semicrystalline model that
captures a heterogeneous material with crystalline and amorphous domains
(see Supporting Information for details).
The crystalline domains have a charge mobility μagg. The two-dimensional nature of the grid of crystals aims to approximate
the two-dimensional transport within the accumulation layer of a transistor.
If the charge enters a crystal from the amorphous region of the film,
the distance it travels in the crystal is determined by μagg and the field direction, after which it exits again to
the amorphous region at the appropriate position. We leverage both
the amorphous and the semicrystalline versions of our model.We define a morphological trap as the position where the bead-to-bead
orientation is perpendicular to the field.[18] It is instructive to visualize morphological traps for chains of
varying length (Figure ). When the length Nl0 is comparable
to the persistence length lp, there are
few instances where the polymer bends backward with respect to the
field. When Nl0 ≫ lp, there are numerous locations that have traps.
Figure 1
Snapshots of
the wormlike chain conformations for the two different
molecular weights of 50 beads (a) and 350 beads (b). The color scale
represents the z-coordinate (i.e., distance in the
field direction). (c, d) Probability of exiting the chain at each
bead at low (c) and high (d) molecular weights. The charge was initialized
at bead index i = 35 for the 50-bead chain and i = 196 for the 350-bead chain, as marked by the arrows
in panels a and b and dashed lines in panels c and d.
Snapshots of
the wormlike chain conformations for the two different
molecular weights of 50 beads (a) and 350 beads (b). The color scale
represents the z-coordinate (i.e., distance in the
field direction). (c, d) Probability of exiting the chain at each
bead at low (c) and high (d) molecular weights. The charge was initialized
at bead index i = 35 for the 50-bead chain and i = 196 for the 350-bead chain, as marked by the arrows
in panels a and b and dashed lines in panels c and d.We visualize the traps by examining the exit distribution
for three
different field strengths (upper panels of Figures c and 1d). For the
50-bead chain, the high probability at a high z-position
indicates that the charge is swept toward the end and remains there
before exiting. The exit distribution is more balanced at lower fields
(F = 0.01 V/nm) and skewed at large fields (F = 0.1 V/nm). For the 350-bead chain, the probability distribution
shows peaks and valleys within the chain that correspond to the traps.
The high-field distribution peaks at the trap near the initial position,
and the charge is unlikely to make its way around the winding turns
to traverse further along the chain. At lower fields, the charge can
exit the morphological trap and reaches the upper chain end.It is commonly observed that mobility is strongly dependent on
the molecular weight.[19,20] Thin-film transistor measurements
demonstrate that mobility initially increases with length before leveling
off. However, there are few theoretical studies aimed at understanding
the influence of chain length on mobility, and existing studies neglect
the field, which we demonstrate in Figure to impact charge trapping.Previous
work examines conductivity from a scaling perspective.[21,22] If the carrier has time to completely explore the chain, the conductivity
scales with molecular weight, while if it quickly hops between chains
the two are independent. Pearson et al.[22] analyze the conductivity by finding the distance a charge diffuses
along a chain in the absence of field. Similarly, Carbone et al. analyze
several conformation models. In the absence of field, the distance
a charge diffuses along a chain depends only on the chain length and
the interchain hopping time.[23] None of
these studies quantify the effect of field on mobility, limiting their
applicability to address experimental field dependence. Furthermore,
conformation-dependent trapping shown in Figure is strongly influenced by field and cannot
be addressed in the absence of field.P3HT is an ideal model
system to test the theory due to the wealth
of experimental data in the literature. In Figure , we model mobility data from Chang et al.[19] for P3HT of varying molecular weight. This molecular
weight series is synthesized to have consistent regioregularity, and
the transistors are fabricated uniformly and characterized by the
same group. Under similar conditions as in ref (19) and over a range of comparable
molecular weights, the degree of crystallinity of P3HT films is found
to be approximately constant.[24] Therefore,
we fix the degree of crystallinity across all molecular weight values.[19] The fixed parameters used are a fraction crystallinity
of 45%, grid size of 15 nm, channel length of 1 μm, l0 = 0.4 nm, F = 0.025 V/nm,
and T = 295 K. The first two parameters are derived
from X-ray and absorption measurements,[24] while the channel length and field are given parameters of the transistor
experiment. The fitted parameters are lp = 3.01 nm, J0 = 295 meV, λ0 = 368 meV, μagg = 0.2895 cm2/(V
s), and khop = 6 × 109 1/s.
Figure 2
Experimental data and simulated mobility versus chain length. The
increase in the mobility is associated with the reduction in the number
of chain-end traps between crystallites with increasing chain length.
Experimental data and simulated mobility versus chain length. The
increase in the mobility is associated with the reduction in the number
of chain-end traps between crystallites with increasing chain length.Another unique feature of polymer
semiconductors is the field dependence.
In time-of-flight (TOF) measurements, mobility is often measured to
have a Poole–Frenkel dependence.[25] This type of field dependence is commonly attributed to correlated
energetic and positional disorder selected from a Gaussian distribution
of site energies.[10,11] In our conformation-based model,
the properties of the wormlike chain also naturally result in this
Poole–Frenkel behavior[16] as the
chain conformations introduce energetic disorder with position correlations.However, there are a number of experiments where mobility decreases
with increasing field (negative β). Several explanations have
been proposed. Diffusive motion becomes significant at low fields
and high temperatures, but calculations by Fishchuk et al.[26] estimate a critical field ∼4 orders of
magnitude lower than typical fields. Juska et al.[27] suggest that several TOF experiments[28] may not provide an accurate measurement of long-time mobility
and propose using charge extraction by linearly increasing voltage
(CELIV).[29] Mozer et al.[10,11] used both CELIV and TOF for P3HT and confirmed a negative field
dependence with both techniques. Others observe similar behavior in
P3OT,[13] PHPS,[12] and doped polymers.[30,31] Shen et al.[32] observe a negative field dependence in P3HT above 120 °C,
close to the melting point. Finally, some CELIV reports[33] observe negative field dependence for P3HT over
all fields.We use our amorphous charge-transport model to fit
mobility data
obtained by Mozer et al.[11] at different
temperatures and fields (Figure ). Since the details of the field dependence are due
to the fundamental properties of the amorphous conjugated polymers
rather than those of the crystals (see below), we use an entirely
amorphous polymer model. The parameters resulting in the best fit
were l0 = 0.404 nm, lp = 3.19 nm, J = 194 meV, λ0 = 170 meV, Jhop = 2.4 meV, λhop = 378 meV, and γ = 4.85.
Figure 3
Examples of negative-field-dependent
fits to P3HT bulk mobility
data using the three-dimensional model. TOF data from Mozer et al.[11] and corresponding 3D simulation fit. A molecular
weight of n = 200 was used.
Examples of negative-field-dependent
fits to P3HT bulk mobility
data using the three-dimensional model. TOF data from Mozer et al.[11] and corresponding 3D simulation fit. A molecular
weight of n = 200 was used.Charge trapping dictates the impact of molecular weight and
electric
field on charge transport (Figure ). Depending on whether trapping occurs at a morphological
trap or a chain end, increasing field can be either beneficial or
harmful. The field strength controls the overall vertical distance
the charge travels. For optimum mobility, the charge should explore
the entire chain and locate the furthest point in the field direction.
As long as there is somewhere “up” to go, increasing
the field increases the rate of movement toward the local maximum: .
This field-dependent hopping rate yields
a traditional positive Poole–Frenkel coefficient.The
distance traveled per chain varies with chain length. If the
charge is at a local trap on a long chain (i.e., a local maximum),
the rate to navigate around the trap (without hopping to a neighboring
chain) decreases with increasing field: . Thus, the charge is less likely
to escape
the trap at higher fields. In contrast, for a short chain, it is more
likely that the charge encounters a chain end as a trap. In this case,
transport always improves with higher field, since the charge can
more efficiently escape to a new chain: . The molecular weight determines
the number
of morphological traps, which in turn controls the overall transport
behavior with field as a function of the three rates.This concept
of morphological trapping is crucial to understanding
the molecular weight dependence of mobility observed in transport
measurements, where two broad regimes of behavior emerge. In the first
regime, mobility increases sharply with increasing chain length at
low chain lengths. The second regime is the saturation of mobility
at higher molecular weights. At low molecular weight, large but disconnected
crystals are formed, creating traps between grains due to chain ends.
As molecular weight increases, more chains are able to bridge these
increasingly disordered crystals and charges no longer encounter traps
in the intergrain region. Noriega et al.[34] suggest that the amount of disorder in the crystals, as measured
by paracrystallinity, levels off at around the same length at which
the chains become entangled and begin to fold back. Thus, a saturation
point in connectivity is reached where transport is limited by interchain
hopping.Our model indicates that the increased connectivity
between crystallites
is due to persistence-length effects and a reduction of chain ends
in the amorphous region with increasing length. Our simulation predicts
the concentration of these tie molecules with chain length and persistence
length. We track possible routes of a charge exiting a crystal (Figure a). Figure b shows the fraction of chains
that exhibit the routes shown in Figure a for varying ratios of the persistence length lp to the intercrystallite spacing d (ranging from lp = 0.25d in blue to lp = 4d in
red). The number of tie chains saturates with molecular weight (Figure b), mirroring how
mobility saturates with molecular weight. As the persistence length lp increases relative to the intercrystallite
spacing, tie chains contain fewer kinks, and the tie-chain fraction
at large molecular weights increases (Figure b). The role of connectivity can be deduced
by comparing semicrystalline simulations with purely amorphous simulations.
The latter also show an increase of mobility with chain length, as
expected due to polymer conformation and chain-length effects, but
the increase is not as significant in magnitude as in the semicrystalline
microstructure. Indeed, Li et al.[35] observed
that in the PBnDT-FTAZ polymer blended with PCBM, which gives rise
to a nearly amorphous polymer microstructure, hole mobility increases
only about a factor of 2 going from 10 kDa to 60 kDa, in contrast
with the semicrystalline P3HT data set where mobility increased by
a factor of 10 when molecular weight increased by the same factor.
Figure 4
Fraction
of charge-chain instances where the charge exited into
another crystal or into the amorphous material. (a) Schematic of possible
scenarios for single-chain transport resulting in (i) an exit into
a crystal, (ii) a jump into the amorphous region from the middle of
the chain, or (iii) a jump into the amorphous region from the end
of a chain (first and last two beads). In panel b, dashed curves are
exiting to a crystal and solid curves exit to amorphous region, while
in the inset of panel b dashed curves correspond to midchain hops
and solid curves to end-chain hops. The field barrier is slightly
higher than the temperature, and the colors indicate a range of intercrystallite
spacing from d = 4lp in
blue to d = 0.25lp in
red.
Fraction
of charge-chain instances where the charge exited into
another crystal or into the amorphous material. (a) Schematic of possible
scenarios for single-chain transport resulting in (i) an exit into
a crystal, (ii) a jump into the amorphous region from the middle of
the chain, or (iii) a jump into the amorphous region from the end
of a chain (first and last two beads). In panel b, dashed curves are
exiting to a crystal and solid curves exit to amorphous region, while
in the inset of panel b dashed curves correspond to midchain hops
and solid curves to end-chain hops. The field barrier is slightly
higher than the temperature, and the colors indicate a range of intercrystallite
spacing from d = 4lp in
blue to d = 0.25lp in
red.At low molecular weights, the
chain-end effects are the dominant
contribution to the mobility trend (inset of Figure b). The separation into end-chain and midchain
traps is not proportional to the bead distribution. The charge is
equally likely to leave a short chain from an end or from the rest
of the chain, indicating that the ends play a significant role. The
overall likelihood that a charge crosses on a tie molecule also depends
on the field strength, and the dependence of the fraction of tie molecules
on persistence length becomes stronger with field (Figure S1). This trend is due to the morphological trapping
described in Figure , where a charge has a higher chance of being stuck in the middle
of the chain at higher fields. The distance traveled on a single amorphous
chain as a function of field strength initially increases and then
decreases due to the prevalence of the morphological trapping effect
(Figure S4a).We expect that the
field dependence of mobility should also be
influenced by the molecular weight. At shorter chain lengths, the
mobility has the traditional Poole–Frenkel dependence and a
positive value for β (Figure S4b)
because there are no morphological traps to traverse. For the longer
chains, the mobility is much less field-dependent overall, and the
mobility increases for decreasing field strength at lower field values.
Experimentally, several groups observe that lower molecular weight
chains have a stronger field dependence, in both field-effect transport
measurements (2D transport) and space-charge-limited current measurements
(3D transport).[19,36]Prior works suggest that
the field dependence can be explained
within the Gaussian framework by introducing positional disorder into
the site energies. Fishchuk et al.[26,37] explain the
negative field dependence within the Gaussian framework by hypothesizing
that increased positional disorder creates field-induced “dead
ends” in an analogy with directed percolation theories.[38,39] The increasing field may eliminate the faster percolation routes,
in which portions of the critical path require current to run backward
against the field. However, the positional disorder introduced in
these works[26,37] is not associated with molecular
or microstructural features of the material. The merit of interpreting
transport through the lens of our framework is that dead ends are
naturally based in the morphology of the chains as either midchain
traps or chain ends. Thus, the model identifies the faster transport
path as the route along one connected chain. By demonstrating the
molecular origins of traps, it becomes possible to systematically
design films that avoid high concentrations of these dead ends. Controlling
the mesostructure of semiconducting polymers has offered major performance
improvements, and our model physically rationalizes such improvements
and suggests a theoretical route for further optimization.We
are currently exploring the impact of on-site energetic disorder
in our model. Energetic disorder along the chain leads to a model
that varies from our current description (at low variance in the energy)
to an effective Gaussian disorder model (at high variance in the energy).
The basic trend is that both models capture the Poole–Frenkel
effect over a range of fields. However, the inverse Poole–Frenkel
is not observed when the spread (or variance) in the site energies
is sufficiently large. We will fully explore these effects in our
future work.In conclusion, the dramatic increase of mobility
with chain length
and the unique features of the field dependence of the mobility reveal
that charge transport in polymers is strongly influenced by the chain
conformations. The prevalence of traps changes with the length, and
the degree to which the charge is able to navigate around these traps
depends on the field strength. The direct incorporation of the polymer
chain into a transport model ties together molecular and mesoscale
properties in explaining complex experimental trends. Well-established
approaches to controlling the conformational properties and the mesoscale
structure of polymers are instrumental in the fabrication of polymeric
materials with desirable mechanical, transport, thermal, and optical
properties. This work lays the foundation for leveraging such processing
techniques for the predictive design of microstructures that would
lead to enhanced electronic properties.
Authors: Rodrigo Noriega; Jonathan Rivnay; Koen Vandewal; Felix P V Koch; Natalie Stingelin; Paul Smith; Michael F Toney; Alberto Salleo Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2013-08-04 Impact factor: 43.841