Literature DB >> 28058280

Anomalous Charge Transport in Conjugated Polymers Reveals Underlying Mechanisms of Trapping and Percolation.

Sonya A Mollinger1, Alberto Salleo1, Andrew J Spakowitz2.   

Abstract

While transport in conjugated polymers has many similarities to that in crystalline inorganic materials, several key differences reveal the unique relationship between the morphology of polymer films and the charge mobility. We develop a model that directly incorporates the molecular properties of the polymer film and correctly predicts these unique transport features. At low degree of polymerization, the increase of the mobility with the polymer chain length reveals trapping at chain ends, and saturation of the mobility at high degree of polymerization results from conformational traps within the chains. Similarly, the inverse field dependence of the mobility reveals that transport on single polymer chains is characterized by the ability of the charge to navigate around kinks and loops in the chain. These insights emphasize the connection between the polymer conformations and the transport and thereby offer a route to designing improved device morphologies through molecular design and materials processing.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28058280      PMCID: PMC5200932          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Conjugated polymers are a widely researched material in the field of flexible and low-cost electronic devices. These polymers are currently used in organic solar cells[1,2] and as the active material in thin-film organic transistors.[3,4] Transistors based on semiconducting polymers have reached mobility values exceeding that of amorphous silicon and comparable to that of single crystals of organic small molecules.[5,6] Unlike inorganic or ordered organic materials, typical polymer devices are made of semicrystalline films, which contain both significant regions of amorphous material as well as paracrystalline regions of ordered aggregated polymers. Several features of transport in conjugated polymers recall properties of inorganic amorphous semiconductors. For example, the widely observed Poole–Frenkel effect[7,8] dictates that the mobility μ increases exponentially with the square root of the field strength F, i.e., μ ∼ exp(β√F), where β is a positive constant. Transport is also temperature-activated where the mobility follows an exponential trend in the inverse of temperature. These similarities have encouraged researchers to leverage experimental insights and theoretical models for inorganic amorphous semiconductors in establishing the fundamental design principles for charge transport in conjugated polymer materials. Their macromolecular nature however makes conjugated polymers fundamentally different from amorphous inorganic semiconductors. The ubiquitous presence of polymers in a broad spectrum of materials applications is driven by desirable properties that directly arise from macromolecular structural features. Polymer entanglement at large molecular weight is well-exploited when controlling the mechanical properties of plastics[9] and the flow properties of polymeric fluids. Block copolymers self-assemble into ordered microphase structures with feature size that is controlled by molecular weight. Such self-assembled morphologies are exploited for nanoscale lithography for electronic and optical devices and for nanoparticle synthesis. All living things are composed of polymeric materials with exquisite molecular organization and functional capabilities that are dictated by the linkage of chemically diverse amino acids into chains. There exist many approaches to controlling molecular organization within such polymeric materials for desirable properties. It is not surprising that some features of charge transport in conjugated polymers are unique to this family of materials. The mobility in general increases nonlinearly with the degree of polymerization of the polymer. Furthermore, a number of experimental data sets demonstrate that at low fields the Poole–Frenkel effect disappears or even inverts.[10−13] We posit that these phenomena reflect the nature of charge transport along a polymer chain and are therefore an expression of the macromolecular nature of the material. We demonstrate that the key physical process controlling mobility is the capacity for a charge to navigate around traps. We simulate the mobility using polymer conformations to describe the intercrystallite amorphous regions and offer explanations of observed trends. Our work shows how the interplay between polymer conformations and charge transport gives rise to unique behaviors. Polymer science has established a wealth of approaches to controlling conformational properties in polymeric materials using thermodynamic and processing techniques. Thus, insights from our model can be exploited for the design and processing of new materials with improved transport by providing a direct connection between the polymer conformational properties and the device-scale performance. The π-conjugation within conjugated polymers results in chains with considerable structural rigidity. Thus, the conformational properties of conjugated polymers can be modeled using the wormlike chain model.[14,15] The chains are discretized into beads that represent monomers with length l0, and the bending rigidity is dictated by the persistence length lp. The bending angles are determined from the wormlike chain model probability distribution.[16] The resulting conformation is defined by the bead positions r⃗, where i runs from 1 to the number of beads N. We assume that a charge is localized on a single bead and is capable of hopping to either of the neighboring beads or off to a neighboring chain.[16] The hopping rates are determined by Marcus theory.[17] A charge q within a field of magnitude F in the z-direction experiences an energy difference ΔG between sites i and j, given bywhere z = r⃗ ·ẑ. The hopping rate from site i to site i + 1 along a single chain iswhere J0 is the electronic coupling between beads, λ0 is the reorganization energy, and ℏ is the reduced Planck’s constant. Each site can also couple to a site on a different chain, with a rate khop determined by the interchain electronic coupling Jhop and reorganization energy λhop. We assume a constant energy difference Δhop = Fqγl0 for interchain transfer, where γ is the ratio between the interchain hop distance and the segment length l0. Our dynamic Monte Carlo algorithm for amorphous charge transport bridges the single-chain behavior to charge transport within an amorphous region within a semicrystalline material (see Supporting Information for details). The charge takes a series of steps along a chain and between chains with the respective hopping rates. If the charge hops off the chain in the amorphous region, a new chain is generated. This procedure continues until the charge reaches a crystal. The goal in our model is to capture chain conformations as the pathways for charge transport, and other contributions, such as energetic disorder and conjugation-length heterogeneity, can be introduced later as refinements. Our amorphous model acts as input to a semicrystalline model that captures a heterogeneous material with crystalline and amorphous domains (see Supporting Information for details). The crystalline domains have a charge mobility μagg. The two-dimensional nature of the grid of crystals aims to approximate the two-dimensional transport within the accumulation layer of a transistor. If the charge enters a crystal from the amorphous region of the film, the distance it travels in the crystal is determined by μagg and the field direction, after which it exits again to the amorphous region at the appropriate position. We leverage both the amorphous and the semicrystalline versions of our model. We define a morphological trap as the position where the bead-to-bead orientation is perpendicular to the field.[18] It is instructive to visualize morphological traps for chains of varying length (Figure ). When the length Nl0 is comparable to the persistence length lp, there are few instances where the polymer bends backward with respect to the field. When Nl0 ≫ lp, there are numerous locations that have traps.
Figure 1

Snapshots of the wormlike chain conformations for the two different molecular weights of 50 beads (a) and 350 beads (b). The color scale represents the z-coordinate (i.e., distance in the field direction). (c, d) Probability of exiting the chain at each bead at low (c) and high (d) molecular weights. The charge was initialized at bead index i = 35 for the 50-bead chain and i = 196 for the 350-bead chain, as marked by the arrows in panels a and b and dashed lines in panels c and d.

Snapshots of the wormlike chain conformations for the two different molecular weights of 50 beads (a) and 350 beads (b). The color scale represents the z-coordinate (i.e., distance in the field direction). (c, d) Probability of exiting the chain at each bead at low (c) and high (d) molecular weights. The charge was initialized at bead index i = 35 for the 50-bead chain and i = 196 for the 350-bead chain, as marked by the arrows in panels a and b and dashed lines in panels c and d. We visualize the traps by examining the exit distribution for three different field strengths (upper panels of Figures c and 1d). For the 50-bead chain, the high probability at a high z-position indicates that the charge is swept toward the end and remains there before exiting. The exit distribution is more balanced at lower fields (F = 0.01 V/nm) and skewed at large fields (F = 0.1 V/nm). For the 350-bead chain, the probability distribution shows peaks and valleys within the chain that correspond to the traps. The high-field distribution peaks at the trap near the initial position, and the charge is unlikely to make its way around the winding turns to traverse further along the chain. At lower fields, the charge can exit the morphological trap and reaches the upper chain end. It is commonly observed that mobility is strongly dependent on the molecular weight.[19,20] Thin-film transistor measurements demonstrate that mobility initially increases with length before leveling off. However, there are few theoretical studies aimed at understanding the influence of chain length on mobility, and existing studies neglect the field, which we demonstrate in Figure to impact charge trapping. Previous work examines conductivity from a scaling perspective.[21,22] If the carrier has time to completely explore the chain, the conductivity scales with molecular weight, while if it quickly hops between chains the two are independent. Pearson et al.[22] analyze the conductivity by finding the distance a charge diffuses along a chain in the absence of field. Similarly, Carbone et al. analyze several conformation models. In the absence of field, the distance a charge diffuses along a chain depends only on the chain length and the interchain hopping time.[23] None of these studies quantify the effect of field on mobility, limiting their applicability to address experimental field dependence. Furthermore, conformation-dependent trapping shown in Figure is strongly influenced by field and cannot be addressed in the absence of field. P3HT is an ideal model system to test the theory due to the wealth of experimental data in the literature. In Figure , we model mobility data from Chang et al.[19] for P3HT of varying molecular weight. This molecular weight series is synthesized to have consistent regioregularity, and the transistors are fabricated uniformly and characterized by the same group. Under similar conditions as in ref (19) and over a range of comparable molecular weights, the degree of crystallinity of P3HT films is found to be approximately constant.[24] Therefore, we fix the degree of crystallinity across all molecular weight values.[19] The fixed parameters used are a fraction crystallinity of 45%, grid size of 15 nm, channel length of 1 μm, l0 = 0.4 nm, F = 0.025 V/nm, and T = 295 K. The first two parameters are derived from X-ray and absorption measurements,[24] while the channel length and field are given parameters of the transistor experiment. The fitted parameters are lp = 3.01 nm, J0 = 295 meV, λ0 = 368 meV, μagg = 0.2895 cm2/(V s), and khop = 6 × 109 1/s.
Figure 2

Experimental data and simulated mobility versus chain length. The increase in the mobility is associated with the reduction in the number of chain-end traps between crystallites with increasing chain length.

Experimental data and simulated mobility versus chain length. The increase in the mobility is associated with the reduction in the number of chain-end traps between crystallites with increasing chain length. Another unique feature of polymer semiconductors is the field dependence. In time-of-flight (TOF) measurements, mobility is often measured to have a Poole–Frenkel dependence.[25] This type of field dependence is commonly attributed to correlated energetic and positional disorder selected from a Gaussian distribution of site energies.[10,11] In our conformation-based model, the properties of the wormlike chain also naturally result in this Poole–Frenkel behavior[16] as the chain conformations introduce energetic disorder with position correlations. However, there are a number of experiments where mobility decreases with increasing field (negative β). Several explanations have been proposed. Diffusive motion becomes significant at low fields and high temperatures, but calculations by Fishchuk et al.[26] estimate a critical field ∼4 orders of magnitude lower than typical fields. Juska et al.[27] suggest that several TOF experiments[28] may not provide an accurate measurement of long-time mobility and propose using charge extraction by linearly increasing voltage (CELIV).[29] Mozer et al.[10,11] used both CELIV and TOF for P3HT and confirmed a negative field dependence with both techniques. Others observe similar behavior in P3OT,[13] PHPS,[12] and doped polymers.[30,31] Shen et al.[32] observe a negative field dependence in P3HT above 120 °C, close to the melting point. Finally, some CELIV reports[33] observe negative field dependence for P3HT over all fields. We use our amorphous charge-transport model to fit mobility data obtained by Mozer et al.[11] at different temperatures and fields (Figure ). Since the details of the field dependence are due to the fundamental properties of the amorphous conjugated polymers rather than those of the crystals (see below), we use an entirely amorphous polymer model. The parameters resulting in the best fit were l0 = 0.404 nm, lp = 3.19 nm, J = 194 meV, λ0 = 170 meV, Jhop = 2.4 meV, λhop = 378 meV, and γ = 4.85.
Figure 3

Examples of negative-field-dependent fits to P3HT bulk mobility data using the three-dimensional model. TOF data from Mozer et al.[11] and corresponding 3D simulation fit. A molecular weight of n = 200 was used.

Examples of negative-field-dependent fits to P3HT bulk mobility data using the three-dimensional model. TOF data from Mozer et al.[11] and corresponding 3D simulation fit. A molecular weight of n = 200 was used. Charge trapping dictates the impact of molecular weight and electric field on charge transport (Figure ). Depending on whether trapping occurs at a morphological trap or a chain end, increasing field can be either beneficial or harmful. The field strength controls the overall vertical distance the charge travels. For optimum mobility, the charge should explore the entire chain and locate the furthest point in the field direction. As long as there is somewhere “up” to go, increasing the field increases the rate of movement toward the local maximum: . This field-dependent hopping rate yields a traditional positive Poole–Frenkel coefficient. The distance traveled per chain varies with chain length. If the charge is at a local trap on a long chain (i.e., a local maximum), the rate to navigate around the trap (without hopping to a neighboring chain) decreases with increasing field: . Thus, the charge is less likely to escape the trap at higher fields. In contrast, for a short chain, it is more likely that the charge encounters a chain end as a trap. In this case, transport always improves with higher field, since the charge can more efficiently escape to a new chain: . The molecular weight determines the number of morphological traps, which in turn controls the overall transport behavior with field as a function of the three rates. This concept of morphological trapping is crucial to understanding the molecular weight dependence of mobility observed in transport measurements, where two broad regimes of behavior emerge. In the first regime, mobility increases sharply with increasing chain length at low chain lengths. The second regime is the saturation of mobility at higher molecular weights. At low molecular weight, large but disconnected crystals are formed, creating traps between grains due to chain ends. As molecular weight increases, more chains are able to bridge these increasingly disordered crystals and charges no longer encounter traps in the intergrain region. Noriega et al.[34] suggest that the amount of disorder in the crystals, as measured by paracrystallinity, levels off at around the same length at which the chains become entangled and begin to fold back. Thus, a saturation point in connectivity is reached where transport is limited by interchain hopping. Our model indicates that the increased connectivity between crystallites is due to persistence-length effects and a reduction of chain ends in the amorphous region with increasing length. Our simulation predicts the concentration of these tie molecules with chain length and persistence length. We track possible routes of a charge exiting a crystal (Figure a). Figure b shows the fraction of chains that exhibit the routes shown in Figure a for varying ratios of the persistence length lp to the intercrystallite spacing d (ranging from lp = 0.25d in blue to lp = 4d in red). The number of tie chains saturates with molecular weight (Figure b), mirroring how mobility saturates with molecular weight. As the persistence length lp increases relative to the intercrystallite spacing, tie chains contain fewer kinks, and the tie-chain fraction at large molecular weights increases (Figure b). The role of connectivity can be deduced by comparing semicrystalline simulations with purely amorphous simulations. The latter also show an increase of mobility with chain length, as expected due to polymer conformation and chain-length effects, but the increase is not as significant in magnitude as in the semicrystalline microstructure. Indeed, Li et al.[35] observed that in the PBnDT-FTAZ polymer blended with PCBM, which gives rise to a nearly amorphous polymer microstructure, hole mobility increases only about a factor of 2 going from 10 kDa to 60 kDa, in contrast with the semicrystalline P3HT data set where mobility increased by a factor of 10 when molecular weight increased by the same factor.
Figure 4

Fraction of charge-chain instances where the charge exited into another crystal or into the amorphous material. (a) Schematic of possible scenarios for single-chain transport resulting in (i) an exit into a crystal, (ii) a jump into the amorphous region from the middle of the chain, or (iii) a jump into the amorphous region from the end of a chain (first and last two beads). In panel b, dashed curves are exiting to a crystal and solid curves exit to amorphous region, while in the inset of panel b dashed curves correspond to midchain hops and solid curves to end-chain hops. The field barrier is slightly higher than the temperature, and the colors indicate a range of intercrystallite spacing from d = 4lp in blue to d = 0.25lp in red.

Fraction of charge-chain instances where the charge exited into another crystal or into the amorphous material. (a) Schematic of possible scenarios for single-chain transport resulting in (i) an exit into a crystal, (ii) a jump into the amorphous region from the middle of the chain, or (iii) a jump into the amorphous region from the end of a chain (first and last two beads). In panel b, dashed curves are exiting to a crystal and solid curves exit to amorphous region, while in the inset of panel b dashed curves correspond to midchain hops and solid curves to end-chain hops. The field barrier is slightly higher than the temperature, and the colors indicate a range of intercrystallite spacing from d = 4lp in blue to d = 0.25lp in red. At low molecular weights, the chain-end effects are the dominant contribution to the mobility trend (inset of Figure b). The separation into end-chain and midchain traps is not proportional to the bead distribution. The charge is equally likely to leave a short chain from an end or from the rest of the chain, indicating that the ends play a significant role. The overall likelihood that a charge crosses on a tie molecule also depends on the field strength, and the dependence of the fraction of tie molecules on persistence length becomes stronger with field (Figure S1). This trend is due to the morphological trapping described in Figure , where a charge has a higher chance of being stuck in the middle of the chain at higher fields. The distance traveled on a single amorphous chain as a function of field strength initially increases and then decreases due to the prevalence of the morphological trapping effect (Figure S4a). We expect that the field dependence of mobility should also be influenced by the molecular weight. At shorter chain lengths, the mobility has the traditional Poole–Frenkel dependence and a positive value for β (Figure S4b) because there are no morphological traps to traverse. For the longer chains, the mobility is much less field-dependent overall, and the mobility increases for decreasing field strength at lower field values. Experimentally, several groups observe that lower molecular weight chains have a stronger field dependence, in both field-effect transport measurements (2D transport) and space-charge-limited current measurements (3D transport).[19,36] Prior works suggest that the field dependence can be explained within the Gaussian framework by introducing positional disorder into the site energies. Fishchuk et al.[26,37] explain the negative field dependence within the Gaussian framework by hypothesizing that increased positional disorder creates field-induced “dead ends” in an analogy with directed percolation theories.[38,39] The increasing field may eliminate the faster percolation routes, in which portions of the critical path require current to run backward against the field. However, the positional disorder introduced in these works[26,37] is not associated with molecular or microstructural features of the material. The merit of interpreting transport through the lens of our framework is that dead ends are naturally based in the morphology of the chains as either midchain traps or chain ends. Thus, the model identifies the faster transport path as the route along one connected chain. By demonstrating the molecular origins of traps, it becomes possible to systematically design films that avoid high concentrations of these dead ends. Controlling the mesostructure of semiconducting polymers has offered major performance improvements, and our model physically rationalizes such improvements and suggests a theoretical route for further optimization. We are currently exploring the impact of on-site energetic disorder in our model. Energetic disorder along the chain leads to a model that varies from our current description (at low variance in the energy) to an effective Gaussian disorder model (at high variance in the energy). The basic trend is that both models capture the Poole–Frenkel effect over a range of fields. However, the inverse Poole–Frenkel is not observed when the spread (or variance) in the site energies is sufficiently large. We will fully explore these effects in our future work. In conclusion, the dramatic increase of mobility with chain length and the unique features of the field dependence of the mobility reveal that charge transport in polymers is strongly influenced by the chain conformations. The prevalence of traps changes with the length, and the degree to which the charge is able to navigate around these traps depends on the field strength. The direct incorporation of the polymer chain into a transport model ties together molecular and mesoscale properties in explaining complex experimental trends. Well-established approaches to controlling the conformational properties and the mesoscale structure of polymers are instrumental in the fabrication of polymeric materials with desirable mechanical, transport, thermal, and optical properties. This work lays the foundation for leveraging such processing techniques for the predictive design of microstructures that would lead to enhanced electronic properties.
  9 in total

1.  Extraction current transients: new method of study of charge transport in microcrystalline silicon

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-05-22       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Charge Diffusion in Semiconducting Polymers: Analytical Relation between Polymer Rigidity and Time Scales for Intrachain and Interchain Hopping.

Authors:  Paola Carbone; Alessandro Troisi
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  Conductivity as a function of conjugation length: Theory and experiment for conducting polymer complexes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1989-03-15

4.  Controlling molecular weight of a high efficiency donor-acceptor conjugated polymer and understanding its significant impact on photovoltaic properties.

Authors:  Wentao Li; Liqiang Yang; John R Tumbleston; Liang Yan; Harald Ade; Wei You
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Approaching disorder-free transport in high-mobility conjugated polymers.

Authors:  Deepak Venkateshvaran; Mark Nikolka; Aditya Sadhanala; Vincent Lemaur; Mateusz Zelazny; Michal Kepa; Michael Hurhangee; Auke Jisk Kronemeijer; Vincenzo Pecunia; Iyad Nasrallah; Igor Romanov; Katharina Broch; Iain McCulloch; David Emin; Yoann Olivier; Jerome Cornil; David Beljonne; Henning Sirringhaus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A general relationship between disorder, aggregation and charge transport in conjugated polymers.

Authors:  Rodrigo Noriega; Jonathan Rivnay; Koen Vandewal; Felix P V Koch; Natalie Stingelin; Paul Smith; Michael F Toney; Alberto Salleo
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Chain conformations dictate multiscale charge transport phenomena in disordered semiconducting polymers.

Authors:  Rodrigo Noriega; Alberto Salleo; Andrew J Spakowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A thienoisoindigo-naphthalene polymer with ultrahigh mobility of 14.4 cm(2)/V·s that substantially exceeds benchmark values for amorphous silicon semiconductors.

Authors:  Gyoungsik Kim; Seok-Ju Kang; Gitish K Dutta; Young-Kyu Han; Tae Joo Shin; Yong-Young Noh; Changduk Yang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Effect of thickness-dependent microstructure on the out-of-plane hole mobility in poly(3-hexylthiophene) films.

Authors:  Bingyuan Huang; Emmanouil Glynos; Bradley Frieberg; Hengxi Yang; Peter F Green
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 9.229

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Generic Model for Lamellar Self-Assembly in Conjugated Polymers: Linking Mesoscopic Morphology and Charge Transport in P3HT.

Authors:  Cristina Greco; Anton Melnyk; Kurt Kremer; Denis Andrienko; Kostas Ch Daoulas
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.985

2.  Nematic Order Imposes Molecular Weight Effect on Charge Transport in Conjugated Polymers.

Authors:  Wenlin Zhang; Scott T Milner; Enrique D Gomez
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 14.553

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.