Zhang-Yu Zou1, Zhi-Rui Zhou2,3, Chun-Hui Che1, Chang-Yun Liu1, Rao-Li He1, Hua-Pin Huang1. 1. Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic studies have shown that C9orf72, SOD1, TARDBP and FUS are the most common mutated genes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Here, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the mutation frequencies of these major ALS-related genes in patients with ALS. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature research to identify all original articles reporting frequencies of C9orf72, SOD1, TARDBP and FUS mutations in ALS. The mutation frequency and effect size of each study were combined. Possible sources of heterogeneity across studies were determined by meta-regression, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis. RESULTS: 111 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled mutation frequencies of these major ALS-related genes were 47.7% in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FALS) and 5.2% in sporadic ALS (SALS). A significant difference was identified regarding the frequencies of mutations in major ALS genes between European and Asian patients. In European populations, the most common mutations were the C9orf72 repeat expansions (FALS 33.7%, SALS 5.1%), followed by SOD1 (FALS 14.8%, SALS 1.2%), TARDBP (FALS 4.2%, SALS 0.8%) and FUS mutations (FALS 2.8%, SALS 0.3%), while in Asian populations the most common mutations were SOD1 mutations (FALS 30.0%, SALS 1.5%), followed by FUS (FALS 6.4%, SALS 0.9%), C9orf72 (FALS 2.3%, SALS 0.3%) and TARDBP (FALS 1.5%, SALS 0.2%) mutations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that the genetic architecture of ALS in Asian populations is distinct from that in European populations, which need to be given appropriate consideration when performing genetic testing of patients with ALS. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: Genetic studies have shown that C9orf72, SOD1, TARDBP and FUS are the most common mutated genes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Here, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the mutation frequencies of these major ALS-related genes in patients with ALS. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature research to identify all original articles reporting frequencies of C9orf72, SOD1, TARDBP and FUS mutations in ALS. The mutation frequency and effect size of each study were combined. Possible sources of heterogeneity across studies were determined by meta-regression, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis. RESULTS: 111 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled mutation frequencies of these major ALS-related genes were 47.7% in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FALS) and 5.2% in sporadic ALS (SALS). A significant difference was identified regarding the frequencies of mutations in major ALS genes between European and Asian patients. In European populations, the most common mutations were the C9orf72 repeat expansions (FALS 33.7%, SALS 5.1%), followed by SOD1 (FALS 14.8%, SALS 1.2%), TARDBP (FALS 4.2%, SALS 0.8%) and FUS mutations (FALS 2.8%, SALS 0.3%), while in Asian populations the most common mutations were SOD1 mutations (FALS 30.0%, SALS 1.5%), followed by FUS (FALS 6.4%, SALS 0.9%), C9orf72 (FALS 2.3%, SALS 0.3%) and TARDBP (FALS 1.5%, SALS 0.2%) mutations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that the genetic architecture of ALS in Asian populations is distinct from that in European populations, which need to be given appropriate consideration when performing genetic testing of patients with ALS. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Griselda A Cabral-Pacheco; Idalia Garza-Veloz; Claudia Castruita-De la Rosa; Jesús M Ramirez-Acuña; Braulio A Perez-Romero; Jesús F Guerrero-Rodriguez; Nadia Martinez-Avila; Margarita L Martinez-Fierro Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-12-20 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Julien H Park; Christiane Elpers; Janine Reunert; Michael L McCormick; Julia Mohr; Saskia Biskup; Oliver Schwartz; Stephan Rust; Marianne Grüneberg; Anja Seelhöfer; Ulrike Schara; Eugen Boltshauser; Douglas R Spitz; Thorsten Marquardt Journal: Brain Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Johannes Dorst; Lu Chen; Angela Rosenbohm; Dong-Sheng Fan; Albert C Ludolph; Jens Dreyhaupt; Annemarie Hübers; Joachim Schuster; Jochen H Weishaupt; Jan Kassubek; Burkhard Gess; Thomas Meyer; Ute Weyen; Andreas Hermann; Jürgen Winkler; Torsten Grehl; Tim Hagenacker; Paul Lingor; Jan C Koch; Anne Sperfeld; Susanne Petri; Julian Großkreutz; Moritz Metelmann; Joachim Wolf; Andrea S Winkler; Thomas Klopstock; Matthias Boentert; Siw Johannesen; Alexander Storch; Bertold Schrank; Daniel Zeller; Xiao-Lu Liu; Lu Tang Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Christopher G Wier; Alexander E Crum; Anthony B Reynolds; Chitra C Iyer; Deepti Chugh; Marilly S Palettas; Patrick L Heilman; David M Kline; W David Arnold; Stephen J Kolb Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 3.217