| Literature DB >> 28057022 |
Isa Anna Maria Immonen1, Ninja Karikoski2, Anna Mykkänen2, Tytti Niemelä2, Jouni Junnila3, Riitta-Mari Tulamo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of colic is expensive and complications may occur. Information on the prognosis and the use of the horse after surgery for colic is important for surgeons and owners. Current literature on return to athletic function after celiotomy is limited. The present study reviewed surgical cases of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Helsinki, Finland for 2006-2012. The aim was to follow the population of horses of different breeds for surgical findings, postsurgical complications, long-term recovery and prognosis. The findings and their influence on survival, return to previous or intended use and performance were assessed.Entities:
Keywords: Colic; Complication; Hernia; Long-term; Owner satisfaction; Performance; Retrospective; Return to use; Surgery; Survival
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28057022 PMCID: PMC5216577 DOI: 10.1186/s13028-016-0273-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Vet Scand ISSN: 0044-605X Impact factor: 1.695
The signalment, short- and long-term outcome and pre- and postoperative use of the operated horses
| Signalment | Small intestine (%a) | Large intestine (%a) | Total (n = 236) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operated patients in total | 72 (30.5%) | 164 (69.5%) | 236 |
| Gender | |||
| Mare | 30 (25.9%) | 86 (74.1%) | 116 (49.2%) |
| Gelding | 23 (29.1%) | 56 (70.9%) | 79 (33.5%) |
| Stallion | 19 (46.3%) | 22 (53.7%) | 41 (17.4%) |
| Age group (years) | |||
| 0–14 | 58 (29.1%) | 141 (70.9%) | 199 (84.3%) |
| Over 15 | 14 (37.8%) | 23 (62.2%) | 37 (15.7%) |
| Breed | |||
| Warm blood | 24 (26.4%) | 67 (73.6%) | 91 (38.6%) |
| Finnhorse | 19 (25.0%) | 57 (75.0%) | 76 (32.2%) |
| Standardbred | 17 (58.6%) | 12 (41.4%) | 29 (12.3%) |
| Other horse breed | 7 (25.0%) | 21 (75.0%) | 28 (11.9%) |
| Pony | 5 (41.7%) | 7 (58.3%) | 12 (5.1%) |
Horses (n = 236) operated for colic between 2006 and 2012 in University of Helsinki, Equine Teaching Hospital, Finland
aPercentages calculated out of the values in the Total-column
bHorses whose owners could not be reached and therefore specific data on postsurgical convalescence could not be acquired. These horses were included in the survival analysis as the date and reason of death were available from the hospital records and national databases (Heppa® database of the Finnish Trotting Association Hippos, Helsinki, Finland)
cHorses of which no records and information were available after discharge. These horses were excluded from all the statistical analyses
Categorised diagnosis, surgical findings, procedures and complications of the operated horses
| Diagnosis category (n = 236) | Total | % |
|---|---|---|
| Small intestine | ||
| Strangulating displacement | 52 | 22.0 |
| Simple obstruction | 8 | 3.4 |
| Large intestine | ||
| Non-strangulating displacement and obstruction | 55 | 23.3 |
| Non-strangulating displacement | 33 | 14.0 |
| Strangulating displacement and obstruction | 27 | 11.4 |
| Simple obstruction | 26 | 11.0 |
| Strangulating displacement | 21 | 8.9 |
| Other | ||
| Anterior enteritis | 5 | 2.1 |
| Gastric/bowel perforation with no other findings | 5 | 2.1 |
| Primary gas accumulation | 4 | 1.7 |
Horses (n = 236) operated for colic between 2006 and 2012 in University of Helsinki, Equine Teaching Hospital, Finland
a One horse may have had more than one finding or procedure, therefore the listed findings and procedures do not exclude each other
b Segment of intestine: NI no information
c Re-laparotomy during hospitalization due to continuous pain, colic, reflux, or incisional dehiscence
The effect and significance of different variables on outcome parameters
| Response | Explanatory variable |
| Odds ratio | 95% CIa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discharge from the hospital | Enterotomy (no vs. yes) | 0.09 | 0.63 | 0.37; 1.07 |
| Postoperative colic | Enterotomy (no vs. yes) | 0.31 | 0.69 | 0.34; 1.40 |
| Lesion location (LI vs. SIb) | 0.01 | 3.27 | 1.31; 8.19 | |
| Return to the same/intended use | Age group (0–14 vs. ≥15) | 0.88 | 1.10 | 0.33; 3.62 |
| Postoperative colic (no vs. yes) | 0.47 | 1.41 | 0.56; 3.54 | |
| Hernia (no vs. yes) | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.16: 3.68 | |
| Lesion location (LI vs. SIb) | 0.49 | 1.42 | 0.53: 3.83 |
a 95% CI 95% confidence interval
b Large intestinal vs. small intestinal lesion
Fig. 1Kaplan–Meier-plot of the overall survival rate following colic surgery. Number of operated horses 236, time 0 = time of surgery
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier-plot of the overall survival rate following colic surgery. Number of discharged horses 143, time 0 = discharge from hospital
Fig. 3Kaplan–Meier-plot of overall survival between small and large intestinal lesions. Number of operated horses 236, time 0 = date of surgery
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier-plot of overall survival rate between age groups. Number of operated horses 236, time 0 = date of surgery. Horses between 0 and 14 years and horses ≥15 years
The association and significance of explanatory variables on the convalescence time
| Effect of the parameter on the convalescence time (months) | Z value |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age group (0–14 vs. ≥15) | −0.59 | 0.55 |
| Lesion location (LI vs. SIa) | 1.90 | 0.057 |
| Postoperative colic (no vs. yes) | −1.42 | 0.15 |
| Wound infection/SSI (no vs. yes) | 0.99 | 0.32 |
a Large intestinal vs. small intestinal lesion