| Literature DB >> 28056801 |
Robert L Baker1, Yulia Yarkhunova2,3, Katherine Vidal2, Brent E Ewers2, Cynthia Weinig2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polyploidy is well studied from a genetic and genomic perspective, but the morphological, anatomical, and physiological consequences of polyploidy remain relatively uncharacterized. Whether these potential changes bear on functional integration or are idiosyncratic remains an open question. Repeated allotetraploid events and multiple genomic combinations as well as overlapping targets of artificial selection make the Brassica triangle an excellent system for exploring variation in the connection between plant structure (anatomy and morphology) and function (physiology). We examine phenotypic integration among structural aspects of leaves including external morphology and internal anatomy with leaf-level physiology among several species of Brassica. We compare diploid and allotetraploid species to ascertain patterns of phenotypic correlations among structural and functional traits and test the hypothesis that allotetraploidy results in trait disintegration allowing for transgressive phenotypes and additional evolutionary and crop improvement potential.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica; Leaf anatomy; Leaf morphology; Leaf physiology; Phenotypic integration; Polyploidy; Triangle of U, Hybridization; Whole genome duplication
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28056801 PMCID: PMC5217196 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0957-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Accession information and sample sizes for plant material used. Crop type and collection information are derived from the GRIN and CGN databases
| Species | Accession ID | Numbera | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| CGN03952 | 5 | CGN |
| CGN03969 | 5 | CGN | |
| CGN03976 | 5 | CGN | |
|
| PI 173857 | 5 | GRIN |
| PI 257240 | 5 | GRIN | |
| PI 470241 | 5 | GRIN | |
| PI 633094 | 4 | GRIN | |
| PI 120923 | 5 | GRIN | |
|
| CGN06897 | 4 | CGN |
| CGN07230 | 5 | CGN | |
| CGN14113 | 5 | CGN | |
| CGN17374 | 5 | CGN | |
|
| CGN06619 | 5 | CGN |
| CGN06620 | 5 | CGN | |
| CGN06627 | 4 | CGN | |
|
| CGN07129 | 5 | CGN |
| CGN14031 | 5 | CGN | |
| CGN14070 | 5 | CGN | |
|
| Ames 2795 | 2 | GRIN |
| CGN06709 | 3 | CGN | |
| CGN06710 | 2 | CGN | |
| CGN06711 | 1 | CGN | |
| CGN06813 | 3 | CGN | |
| CGN07143 | 3 | CGN | |
| CGN07145 | 3 | CGN | |
| PI 459016 | 3 | GRIN | |
| PI 459018 | 3 | GRIN | |
| PI 459020 | 3 | GRIN |
aActual sample sizes for individual tests are indicated by degrees of freedom and may differ for individual analyses because of failed sample processing or due to outlier removal
Fig. 1Paraffin infiltrated leaves cross-sectioned at 10 μM thickness. a. Brassica oleracea (n=9). b. B. carinata (n=17). We defined 1000 μM long sections of leaf (inside the black boxes) that avoided major veins. All measurements occur inside these boundaries. Palisade parenchyma is defined as any tissue above the mid-line of minor veins and below the adaxial epidermis. Spongy mesophyll is defined as any tissue below the mid-line of minor veins and above the abaxial epidermis. All areas refer to predefined 1000 μM long leaf sections. Scale bars are 500 µM
One way ANOVA and planned contrasts for anatomical, morphological, and physiological traits
| Trait | Species effect | Parent-hybrid effect |
|---|---|---|
| Palisade area |
|
|
| Spongy area |
| 0.376 (1,76) NS |
| Palisade/spongy |
|
|
| Palisade layers | 1.467 (5,77) NS | 0.034 (1,77) NS |
| Adaxial area | 1.814 (5,76) NS |
|
| Abaxial area | 1.801 (5,76) NS |
|
| Leaf 4 dry weight (mg) | 1.696 (5,103) NS |
|
| Dry shoots (g) | 1.259 (5,101) NS | 1.215 (1,101) NS |
| SLA |
| 0.168 (1,102) NS |
| Dissection index |
|
|
| Area (cm^2) |
|
|
| Perimeter (cm) |
|
|
| WUE | 0.317 (5,94) NS | 0.202 (1,94) NS |
|
| 1.169 (5,95) NS | 2.569 (1,95) NS |
|
| 0.178 (5,95) NS | 0.669 (1,95) NS |
|
|
| 0.241 (1,86) NS |
|
|
| 0.003 (1,97) NS |
|
| 1.649 (5,91) NS | 2.264 (1,91) NS |
|
|
| 0.019 (1,88) NS |
|
| 1.711 (5,91) NS |
|
Significance: 0 ‘***’; 0.001 ‘**’; 0.01 ‘*’; 0.05 ‘.’
NS Not Significant
Fig. 2Phenotypic correlations among individual plants from the parent (2n) species. B. rapa (blue), B. oleracea (red), and B. nigra (black). Histograms show trait distributions and correlations. Non-significant correlations are in gray. Palisade_spongy, the ratio of palisade parenchyma to spongy mesophyll; p < 0.05, *; p < 0.01, **; p < 0.001, ***, p < 0.0001 ****
Fig. 3Phenotypic correlations among individual plants from the allotetraploid (4n) hybrids. B. oleracea (magenta), B. juncea (brown), and B. carinata (green). Palisade_spongy, the ratio of palisade parenchyma to spongy mesophyll; p < 0.05, *; p < 0.01, **; p < 0.001, ***; p < 0.0001, ****
Fig. 4Cluster analysis of the bivariate relationship between Fo and Fs for diploid parent and allotetraploid hybrid species indicates that the three apparent clusterings of data (cluster 1, circles; cluster 2, crosses; and cluster 3, triangles) is not attributable to individual species (designated by color). Each data point represents an individual plant
Fig. 5The first two axes of the PCA, which explain 24.6 and 17.1% of the variation in the data, respectively. Diploid parents and allotetraploid hybrids are largely overlapping, and the distinction between them can be attributed to SLA and WUE (5A). Individual species are also largely overlapping (5B), however the transgressive nature of the allotetraploid hybrids is evident as two of the diploid parents (B. rapa, B. oleracea,) occupy the center of variation whereas two of the allotetraploid hybrids (B. juncea, B. napus) explore the extremes of the variation evident in the data. Lf4_wetMg, the wet mass of the 4th leaf in mg; dry_shootsG, the mass of dried shoots in grams; Lf4_dryMg, the dry mass of the 4th leaf in mg; area_cm, the area of the 4th leaf in cm2; perimeter_cm, the perimeter of the 4th leaf in cm; dissection_index; the dissection index of the 4th leaf; SLA, specific leaf area of the 4th leaf; palisade_layers, the number of vertical layers of cells in the palisade parenchyma, palisade_max_depth, the maximum depth of palisade parenchyma in μM, palisade_min_depth, the minimum depth of the palisade parenchyma in μM; palisade_area, the area of palisade parenchyma in a 1000 μM long section of leaf in μM; spongy_max_depth, the maximum depth of spongy mesophyll in μM; spongy_min_depth, the minimum depth of spongy mesophyll in μM; spongy_area, the area of spongy mesophyll in a 1000 μM long section of leaf in μM, adaxial_max, the maximum depth of adaxial epidermis in μM, adaxial_min, the minimum depth of the adaxial epidermis in μM, adaxial_area, the area of adaxial epidermis in a 1000 μM long section of leaf in μM, abaxial_max, the maximum depth of the abaxial epidermis in μM; abaxial_min, the minimum depth of abaxial epidermis, abaxial_area, the area of the abaxial epidermis in a 1000 μM long section of leaf; palisade_spongy, the ratio of palisade parenchyma area to spongy mesophyll area; Photo, photosynthetic capacity (A ); Cond, stomatal conductance (g ); WUE, water use efficiency