Frederik T von Rosen1,2, Antonella J von Rosen1,2, Falk Müller-Riemenschneider1,3, Peter Tinnemann1. 1. a Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics , Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin , Berlin , Germany. 2. b Department of Public Health and Health Sciences , University of Bremen , Bremen , Germany. 3. c Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health , National University of Singapore , Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lack of information has been described as a major factor in non-use of oral emergency contraception (EC) following unprotected intercourse. Despite the ongoing vociferous debate on liberalisation of access, little evidence is available on EC knowledge in Germany, particularly among adolescents. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among ninth graders in convenience sample of 13 Berlin schools. We assessed perceived and actual knowledge on the effectiveness, timeframe and availability of EC and on pregnancy risk in six scenarios. RESULTS: A total of 1177 students between 13 and 16 years of age participated. Mean age was 14.6 years (standard deviation 0.67); 51.4% of participants were male. Whilst 8.7% had never heard of EC, 38.6% knew of its effectiveness, but only 12.7% knew the timeframe for EC. Of the sources of EC, only gynaecologists were widely known. Most students correctly evaluated pregnancy risk in given scenarios. Girls were more knowledgeable on most topics except for pregnancy risk. Attending a school of lower academic standard and being of immigrant background was associated with lower knowledge on the majority of items. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, students were aware of the existence of EC, but many lacked the knowledge of when to take it and how to access it. Especially in the light of the recent liberalisation of EC access in Germany, increased educational efforts are warranted to ensure that the population has the knowledge necessary to make a truly informed choice regarding its use.
BACKGROUND: Lack of information has been described as a major factor in non-use of oral emergency contraception (EC) following unprotected intercourse. Despite the ongoing vociferous debate on liberalisation of access, little evidence is available on EC knowledge in Germany, particularly among adolescents. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among ninth graders in convenience sample of 13 Berlin schools. We assessed perceived and actual knowledge on the effectiveness, timeframe and availability of EC and on pregnancy risk in six scenarios. RESULTS: A total of 1177 students between 13 and 16 years of age participated. Mean age was 14.6 years (standard deviation 0.67); 51.4% of participants were male. Whilst 8.7% had never heard of EC, 38.6% knew of its effectiveness, but only 12.7% knew the timeframe for EC. Of the sources of EC, only gynaecologists were widely known. Most students correctly evaluated pregnancy risk in given scenarios. Girls were more knowledgeable on most topics except for pregnancy risk. Attending a school of lower academic standard and being of immigrant background was associated with lower knowledge on the majority of items. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, students were aware of the existence of EC, but many lacked the knowledge of when to take it and how to access it. Especially in the light of the recent liberalisation of EC access in Germany, increased educational efforts are warranted to ensure that the population has the knowledge necessary to make a truly informed choice regarding its use.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescent health; adolescents; emergency contraception; health education; sexual health
Authors: Frederik Tilmann von Rosen; Antonella Juline von Rosen; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Inken Damberg; Peter Tinnemann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Antonella Juline von Rosen; Frederik Tilmann von Rosen; Peter Tinnemann; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 5.428