Rupert Conrad1, Martin Mücke2,3,4, Milka Marinova5, Anna Burghardt2, Christiane Stieber3, Henning Cuhls2, Lukas Radbruch2,6. 1. 1 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Bonn , Bonn, Germany . 2. 2 Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn , Bonn, Germany . 3. 3 Center for Rare Diseases Bonn (ZSEB), University Hospital of Bonn , Bonn, Germany . 4. 4 Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn , Bonn, Germany . 5. 5 Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Bonn , Bonn, Germany . 6. 6 Centre for Palliative Care, Malteser Hospital Bonn/Rhein-Sieg , Bonn, Germany .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life is of central importance in palliative care to understand patients' needs and improve their treatment. However, due to the severely compromised state of health of the severely ill or dying patients, the possibility of an adequate assessment with longer questionnaires is limited. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of the criterion-oriented validity of a single item to measure quality of life in palliative care patients. DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study, correlations of the single item with established questionnaires were analyzed. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: At Malteser Hospital Bonn and Bonn University Hospital, 72 palliative patients, mainly suffering from cancer, were investigated. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical symptoms were measured by the Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS) and quality of life was assessed by the single item "How satisfied are you currently with your physical and emotional well-being?" on a 7-point scale as well as by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS). RESULTS: Seventy-one of 72 patients filled in the single item and the POS, 64 patients the FACT-G. There was a high correlation between the assessment of quality of life by the single item and the FACT-G (r = 0.695, p < 0.01) as well as the POS (r = -0.630, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the criterion-oriented validity of the single item to measure quality of life in palliative care patients. This can be seen as a first step to validate this economic instrument. Future studies should focus on the analysis of further psychometric aspects (e.g., reliability, sensitivity to change) of the single item.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life is of central importance in palliative care to understand patients' needs and improve their treatment. However, due to the severely compromised state of health of the severely ill or dying patients, the possibility of an adequate assessment with longer questionnaires is limited. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of the criterion-oriented validity of a single item to measure quality of life in palliative care patients. DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study, correlations of the single item with established questionnaires were analyzed. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: At Malteser Hospital Bonn and Bonn University Hospital, 72 palliative patients, mainly suffering from cancer, were investigated. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical symptoms were measured by the Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS) and quality of life was assessed by the single item "How satisfied are you currently with your physical and emotional well-being?" on a 7-point scale as well as by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and the Palliative Outcome Scale (POS). RESULTS: Seventy-one of 72 patients filled in the single item and the POS, 64 patients the FACT-G. There was a high correlation between the assessment of quality of life by the single item and the FACT-G (r = 0.695, p < 0.01) as well as the POS (r = -0.630, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the criterion-oriented validity of the single item to measure quality of life in palliative care patients. This can be seen as a first step to validate this economic instrument. Future studies should focus on the analysis of further psychometric aspects (e.g., reliability, sensitivity to change) of the single item.
Entities:
Keywords:
palliative medicine; quality of life; single item