Literature DB >> 28055579

Guidelines for the Direct Detection of Anaplasma spp. in Diagnosis and Epidemiological Studies.

Cornelia Silaghi1, Ana Sofia Santos2, Jacinto Gomes3, Iva Christova4, Ioana Adriana Matei5, Gernot Walder6, Ana Domingos7, Lesley Bell-Sakyi8, Hein Sprong9, Friederike D von Loewenich10, José A Oteo11, José de la Fuente12,13, J Stephen Dumler14,15.   

Abstract

The genus Anaplasma (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) comprises obligate intracellular Gram-negative bacteria that are mainly transmitted by ticks, and currently includes six species: Anaplasma bovis, Anaplasma centrale, Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, and Anaplasma ovis. These have long been known as etiological agents of veterinary diseases that affect domestic and wild animals worldwide. A zoonotic role has been recognized for A. phagocytophilum, but other species can also be pathogenic for humans. Anaplasma infections are usually challenging to diagnose, clinically presenting with nonspecific symptoms that vary greatly depending on the agent involved, the affected host, and other factors such as immune status and coinfections. The substantial economic impact associated with livestock infection and the growing number of human cases along with the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections, determines the need for accurate laboratory tests. Because hosts are usually seronegative in the initial phase of infection and serological cross-reactions with several Anaplasma species are observed after seroconversion, direct tests are the best approach for both case definition and epidemiological studies. Blood samples are routinely used for Anaplasma spp. screening, but in persistently infected animals with intermittent or low-level bacteremia, other tissues might be useful. These guidelines have been developed as a direct outcome of the COST action TD1303 EURNEGVEC ("European Network of Neglected Vectors and Vector-Borne Diseases"). They review the direct laboratory tests (microscopy, nucleic acid-based detection and in vitro isolation) currently used for Anaplasma detection in ticks and vertebrates and their application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaplasma spp.; PCR; direct diagnosis; in vitro isolation; microscopy; ticks; vertebrate hosts

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28055579     DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2016.1960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis        ISSN: 1530-3667            Impact factor:   2.133


  22 in total

1.  Development of a Sensitive and Rapid Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum.

Authors:  Le Jiang; Philip Ching; Chien-Chung Chao; J Stephen Dumler; Wei-Mei Ching
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Tick infestation and occurrence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and piroplasms in cattle in the Republic of Serbia.

Authors:  Ana Vasić; Marion Nieder; Nemanja Zdravković; Jovan Bojkovski; Dejan Bugarski; Ivan Pavlović; Cornelia Silaghi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  The first study on the seroprevalence of Anaplasma spp. in small ruminants and assessment of associated risk factors in North Egypt.

Authors:  Abdelfattah Selim; Kotb A Attia; Roua A Alsubki; Fatima Albohairy; Itoh Kimiko; Mourad Ben Said
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-05-20

4.  Parasitized or non-parasitized, why? A study of factors influencing tick burden in roe deer neonates.

Authors:  Léa Bariod; Sonia Saïd; Clément Calenge; Stéphane Chabot; Vincent Badeau; Gilles Bourgoin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Identification of Anaplasma ovis appendage-associated protein (AAAP) for development of an indirect ELISA and its application.

Authors:  Zhenguo Wang; Jifei Yang; Qingli Niu; Kelly A Brayton; Jianxun Luo; Guangyuan Liu; Hong Yin; Zhijie Liu
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Interferon-γ-dependent control of Anaplasma phagocytophilum by murine neutrophil granulocytes.

Authors:  Kathrin Gussmann; Susanne Kirschnek; Friederike D von Loewenich
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Molecular characterization of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia in ixodid ticks and reservoir hosts from Palestine: a pilot survey.

Authors:  Taher Zaid; Suheir Ereqat; Abdelmajeed Nasereddin; Amer Al-Jawabreh; Ahmad Abdelkader; Ziad Abdeen
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-14

8.  Human granulocytic anaplasmosis in a Single University Hospital in the Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Da Young Kim; Jun-Won Seo; Na Ra Yun; Choon-Mee Kim; Dong-Min Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  New records for Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in small mammal species.

Authors:  Ioana Adriana Matei; Gianluca D'Amico; Angela Monica Ionică; Zsuzsa Kalmár; Alexandra Corduneanu; Attila D Sándor; Nicodim Fiţ; Liviu Bogdan; Călin M Gherman; Andrei Daniel Mihalca
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Seroprevalence and Molecular Detection of Bovine Anaplasmosis in Egypt.

Authors:  Omid Parvizi; Hosny El-Adawy; Falk Melzer; Uwe Roesler; Heinrich Neubauer; Katja Mertens-Scholz
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.