Literature DB >> 28054148

The cost of surviving nitrogen excess: energy and protein demand in the lichen Cladonia portentosa as revealed by proteomic analysis.

Silvana Munzi1, Lucy J Sheppard2, Ian D Leith2, Cristina Cruz3, Cristina Branquinho3, Luca Bini4, Assunta Gagliardi4, Giampiero Cai5, Luigi Parrotta6.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: Different nitrogen forms affect different metabolic pathways in lichens. In particular, the most relevant changes in protein expression were observed in the fungal partner, with NO 3- mostly affecting the energetic metabolism and NH 4+ affecting transport and regulation of proteins and the energetic metabolism much more than NO 3- did. Excess deposition of reactive nitrogen is a well-known agent of stress for lichens, but which symbiont is most affected and how, remains a mystery. Using proteomics can expand our understanding of stress effects on lichens. We investigated the effects of different doses and forms of reactive nitrogen, with and without supplementary phosphorus and potassium, on the proteome of the lichen Cladonia portentosa growing in a 'real-world' simulation of nitrogen deposition. Protein expression changed with the nitrogen treatments but mostly in the fungal partner, with NO3- mainly affecting the energetic metabolism and NH4+ also affecting the protein synthesis machinery. The photobiont mainly responded overexpressing proteins involved in energy production. This suggests that in response to nitrogen stress, the photobiont mainly supports the defensive mechanisms initiated by the mycobiont with an increased energy production. Such surplus energy is then used by the cell to maintain functionality in the presence of NO3-, while a futile cycle of protein production can be hypothesized to be induced by NH4+ excess. External supply of potassium and phosphorus influenced differently the responses of particular enzymes, likely reflecting the many processes in which potassium exerts a regulatory function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ammonium; Molecular mechanism; Mycobiont; Nitrate; Photobiont; Stress response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28054148     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-017-2647-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  31 in total

1.  Functional proteomics analysis of signal transduction pathways of the platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor.

Authors:  V Soskic; M Görlach; S Poznanovic; F D Boehmer; J Godovac-Zimmermann
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-02-09       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  An intrinsically disordered photosystem II subunit, PsbO, provides a structural template and a sensor of the hydrogen-bonding network in photosynthetic water oxidation.

Authors:  Adam R Offenbacher; Brandon C Polander; Bridgette A Barry
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Proteome analysis of non-model plants: a challenging but powerful approach.

Authors:  Sebastien Christian Carpentier; Bart Panis; Annelies Vertommen; Rony Swennen; Kjell Sergeant; Jenny Renaut; Kris Laukens; Erwin Witters; Bart Samyn; Bart Devreese
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Alterations in the metabolic fingerprint of Cladonia portentosa in response to atmospheric nitrogen deposition.

Authors:  Sabine Freitag; Erika J Hogan; Peter D Crittenden; Gordon G Allison; Simon C Thain
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 4.500

5.  Can ammonia tolerance amongst lichen functional groups be explained by physiological responses?

Authors:  S Munzi; C Cruz; C Branquinho; P Pinho; I D Leith; L J Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 6.  Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress--contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response.

Authors:  Klára Kosová; Pavel Vítámvás; Ilja Tom Prášil; Jenny Renaut
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Physiological response of the epiphytic lichen Evernia prunastri (L.) Ach. to ecologically relevant nitrogen concentrations.

Authors:  S Munzi; L Paoli; E Fiorini; S Loppi
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Basidiomycete yeasts in the cortex of ascomycete macrolichens.

Authors:  Toby Spribille; Veera Tuovinen; Philipp Resl; Dan Vanderpool; Heimo Wolinski; M Catherine Aime; Kevin Schneider; Edith Stabentheiner; Merje Toome-Heller; Göran Thor; Helmut Mayrhofer; Hanna Johannesson; John P McCutcheon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Exploring functional contexts of symbiotic sustain within lichen-associated bacteria by comparative omics.

Authors:  Martin Grube; Tomislav Cernava; Jung Soh; Stephan Fuchs; Ines Aschenbrenner; Christian Lassek; Uwe Wegner; Dörte Becher; Katharina Riedel; Christoph W Sensen; Gabriele Berg
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  NH4+-stimulated and -inhibited components of K+ transport in rice (Oryza sativa L.).

Authors:  Mark W Szczerba; Dev T Britto; Shabana A Ali; Konstantine D Balkos; Herbert J Kronzucker
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  3 in total

1.  The influence of growth form and substrate on lichen ecophysiological responses along an aridity gradient.

Authors:  Luca Paoli; Pedro Pinho; Cristina Branquinho; Stefano Loppi; Silvana Munzi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Resilience of Epiphytic Lichens to Combined Effects of Increasing Nitrogen and Solar Radiation.

Authors:  Lourdes Morillas; Javier Roales; Cristina Cruz; Silvana Munzi
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

3.  Ecological distribution and potential roles of Woesearchaeota in anaerobic biogeochemical cycling unveiled by genomic analysis.

Authors:  Xiaobo Liu; Yali Wang; Ji-Dong Gu
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 7.271

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.