Literature DB >> 28053996

Zika Virus Causing Encephalomyelitis Associated With Immunoactivation.

Rafael Mello Galliez1, Mariana Spitz2, Patricia Piazza Rafful3, Marcelo Cagy2, Claudia Escosteguy4, Caroline Spósito Brito Germano2, Elisa Sasse2, Alessandro Luis Gonçalves5, Paola Paz Silveira5, Paula Pezzuto5, Alice Maria de Magalhães Ornelas5, Amilcar Tanuri5, Renato Santana Aguiar5, Fernanda Tovar Moll6.   

Abstract

Brazil has experienced a Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak with increased incidence of congenital malformations and neurological manifestations. We describe a case of a 26-year-old Brazilian Caucasian man infected with ZIKV and diagnosed with encephalomyelitis. Brain and spinal cord images showed hyperintense lesions on T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the cerebrospinal fluid showed a remarkable increase of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8. The observed pattern suggests immune activation during the acute phase, along with the neurological impairment, with normalization in the recovery phase. This is the first longitudinal report of ZIKV infection causing encephalomyelitis with documented immune activation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Zika virus.; encephalomyelitis; neurological manifestations; proinflammatory cytokines

Year:  2016        PMID: 28053996      PMCID: PMC5193179          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofw203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   3.835


In the last 11 months, Brazil has experienced a Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic along with increased incidence of congenital malformations and neurological manifestations, such as acute myelitis and Guillain-Barré syndrome, supposedly associated with the infection. The presence of the virus in several fluids and tissues (blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) has reinforced ZIKV infection causality [1, 2]. However, the spectrum, severity, and pathophysiological aspects of the nervous system involvement remain uncertain [2, 3].

METHODS

A 26-year-old Brazilian Caucasian man was admitted to Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in January 2016, with fever, malaise, and hands paresthesias. The informed consent was obtained to use the patient’s data in this Brief Report. The patient was submitted to physical and neurological examinations regularly, including the following imaging exams: computed tomography [CT] and brain and spinal magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]. Brain MRI exams were performed using standard protocol, including axial, coronal, and sagittal FLAIR, T2-weighted (T2), diffusion, and volumetric T1-weighted (T1) sequences and pre- and postgadolinium injection. Spinal cord standard protocol also included sagittal and axial T2, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), T1 and fat-suppressed T1 sequences, and pre- and postgadolinium injection. Cerebrospinal fluid and urine were collected for further molecular and cellular biological analysis. To evaluate the humoral immune response during ZIKV infection, we investigated the levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the CSF samples collected during the acute phase with neurological symptoms (1 week after symptom onset) and in the recovery phase (5 to 6 weeks after symptom onset) associated with a better outcome of the patient. We investigated 27 cytokines, chemokynes, adhesion molecules, and growth factors using the Bio-Plex Panel 27-Plex (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) (Table 1). Cerebrospinal fluid samples from adult subjects with no history of neurological disorders were used as controls.
Table 1.

Proinflammatory Cytokines, Chemokines, and Growth Factors Levels in CSF Samples Harvested During the Acute and Recovery Phases

CytokinesControls (n = 4)Acute PhaseRecovery Phase
Cytokine Level, pg/mL, Average (SD)Cytokine Level, pg/mL, Average (SD)Fold Change (Sample/Control)Cytokine Level, pg/mL, Average (SD)Fold Change (Sample/Control)
Inflammatory
IL-1ra8.08 (±0.15)36.01 (±6.63)4.4615.05 (±4.79)1.86
IL-69.06 (±6.24)47.35 (±2.90)5.227.32 (±1.29)0.81
IL-21.88 (±0,15)0.28 (±0.40)0.140.84 (±0.10)0.45
IL-51.21 (±0,15)0.52 (±0.10)0.431.41 (±0.57)1.17
IL-102.59 (±0.15)1.00 (±0.95)0.391.73 (±2.04)0.67
IL-125.45 (±0.1)0.97 (±1.37)0.172.71 (±2.90)0.50
IL-1315.08 (±7.12)5.84 (±0.95)0.398.39 (±1.05)0.56
IL-17a23.48 (±21.25)5.95 (±3.93)1.1213.47 (±3.78)0.57
IL-46.19 (±2.21)5.35 (±3.00)0.868.87 (±4.02)1.43
IL-1β0.84 (±0.10)0.54 (±0.38)0.640.69 (±0.31)0.82
IL-95.81 (±6.46)6.06 (±0.10)1.0410.70 (±3.51)1.84
IL-152.92 (±2.12)3.83 (±1.23)1.312.74 (±0.10)0.94
IFN-γ34.77 (±16.85)36.54 (±25.23)1.0553.90 (±16.08)1.55
TNF-α6.26 (±0.15)3.52 (±2.72)0.564.30 (±2.77)0.69
Chemokines
IL-831.00 (±4.36)135.45 (±1.12)4.3757.60 (±8.96)1.86
MIP-1α1.04 (±0.59)2.11 (±0.41)1.932.66 (±0.54)2.56
RANTES4.25 (±0.15)--13.36 (±4.00)3.14
Eotaxin33.25 (±20.12)40.09 (±0.10)1.5059.11 (±24.90)1.78
IP-103174.25 (±918.30)4427.65 (±182.4)1.392317.95 (±25.1)0.73
MCP-1151.50 (±52.29)149.08 (±0.37)0.98145.98 (±3.19)0.96
MIP-1β11.06 (±3.93)15.39 (±0.23)1.3920.22 (±0.51)1.83
Adhesion Molecules and Growth Factors
G-CSF6.48 (±3.20)64.24 (±19.48)9.9120.00 (±3.57)3.09
IL-78.97 (±7.82)9.04 (±4.59)1.0029.88 (±3.15)3.33
FGF Basic15.55 (±11.89)a3.06 (±0.28)0.20
VEGF18,20 (±0.15)11.72 (±0.74)0.6416.73 (±4.14)0.92

Abbreviations: FGF, fibroblast growth factor; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IFN-γ, interferon γ; IL, interleukin; IP, IFN-gamma-inducible protein; MCP, monocyte chemoattractive protein; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; SD, standard deviation; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

aIndeterminate.

Proinflammatory Cytokines, Chemokines, and Growth Factors Levels in CSF Samples Harvested During the Acute and Recovery Phases Abbreviations: FGF, fibroblast growth factor; G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IFN-γ, interferon γ; IL, interleukin; IP, IFN-gamma-inducible protein; MCP, monocyte chemoattractive protein; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; SD, standard deviation; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. aIndeterminate.

RESULTS

The patient had initially noticed malaise and fever, and on the following day he developed paraparesis, lower limbs paresthesias, and urinary retention. On the third day he had tetraparesis, and due to respiratory failure, he required invasive mechanical ventilation. Brain CT was normal, and CSF analysis disclosed 100 white blood cells/mm3 (95% mononuclear), protein of 112 mg/dL, and glucose of 80 mg/dL. Acyclovir and ceftriaxone were started on day 4. The first neurological evaluation was on day 7. Blood pressure was 130 × 80 mmHg, heart rate was 82 beats per minute, oxygen saturation was 99%, and temperature was 39°C. General physical examination was unremarkable. Sedation had been interrupted 12 hours before. The patient had a reduced level of alertness, with eye opening to verbal stimuli; he followed simple verbal commands, but he did not respond properly to the examiner’s questions. Nuchal rigidity was observed. Pupils were equal and reactive. There was horizontal gaze palsy, particularly to the left, and bilateral facial palsy, with preserved corneal reflexes. Muscle strength was grade 0 in lower limbs and 2 in upper limbs. Deep tendon reflexes were increased in upper limbs, patellar reflexes were normal, and ankle jerks were absent. Plantar responses were neutral. There was a T5 sensory level. On the same day, ampicillin/sulbactam, azithromycin, and methylprednisolone were added to the prescription, and a new CSF had an opening pressure of 49 cmH20, 122 cells/mm3 (90% mononuclear), glucose of 77 mg/dL, and negative bacterial and fungi assays. Polymerase chain reaction technique to amplify herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus was negative. Human immunodeficiency virus serology and rheumatologic screening panel were also negative. A new brain and spinal CT were normal. On day 12, methylprednisolone 1 gram qd for 5 days was prescribed, and the patient had partial improvement of neurological symptoms: normalization of eye movements and diminished facial palsy, but unchanged muscle strength. The dose is 0.4g of immunoglobulin per kg of the patient per day was prescribed for 5 days, with further benefits. There was marked strength improvement on upper limbs – grade 3 to 4, and the patient could be weaned from mechanical ventilation; however, paraplegia persisted. Urine and CSF collected 1 week after the initial symptoms were positive for ZIKV reverse transcription-PCR. Brain imaging within 3 weeks of symptoms onset showed multiple patchy areas of hyperintensity on FLAIR and T2 images at both white matter hemispheres, affecting deep and subcortical regions, resembling the projection of corticospinal tract, and, specifically, on the left corona radiate and centrum semiovale, at the posterior limb of both internal capsule, as well as on the left thalami. A remarkable high signal on FLAIR/T2 and low signal on T1 images was found on both medial cerebellar peduncles (Figure 1A). Cortical mantle and basal ganglia showed normal signal intensities, and no pontine or cerebellar lesions were found. An elongated cranial-caudal hyperintensity area after pyramidal tract location could be noted. No abnormal gadolinium enhancement was noted in the parenchyma or meninges. Cervical-thoracic transition of spinal cord showed continuous hyperintensity vertical band on T2/STIR images, extending from C7 to almost the entire spinal length, mostly perceived on ventral horns, which were slightly tumescent from C7 to T6 levels, confirmed with transversal plane images (Figure 1B). The damage patterns of brain and spinal cord share some key features with the West Nile virus [4, 5] or Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) neurological involvement, the latter with more severe thalamus lesions [6, 7]. Follow-up brain and spinal MRI performed 5 weeks after symptom onset revealed significant improvement of the brain abnormalities previously described, although discrete hyperintensities were still visible on FLAIR/T2 images (Figure 1C). Spinal cord exhibited improvement with remarkable remission of signal intensity on images (Figure 1D). No other macroscopic lesions emerged during this period. Follow-up neurological examination revealed improved upper limbs strength (grade 4) and increased deep tendon reflexes, but the patient persisted with flaccid paraparesis with a T5 sensory level. Two weeks later, there was an additional improvement, defined by grade 4 muscle strength in the upper limbs and grade 2 in the lower limbs. Sphincter control was absent, but the patient no longer had urinary retention.
Figure 1.

Magnetic resonance of the brain and spinal cord. (A) First brain exam. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images show multiple hyperintensities on the white matter, most evident on the topography of the corticospinal tract, specifically on the corona radiata (A1) and centrum semiovale (A2), thalamus/internal capsule (A3 arrows), and both medial cerebellar peduncles (A4 arrows). (B) First spinal cord exam. The T2-weighted image (T2WI) shows a continuous hyperintensity signal band vertically oriented along cervical (B1 and B3) and thoracic (B2 and B4) segments, with central and ventral distribution (arrows). (C) Second brain exam (15 days later). All patchy areas remain visible on FLAIR images but show decreased signal intensity in comparison to the first exam. No abnormal contrast enhancement or restricted diffusion areas were identified on both exams (data not shown). (D) Second spinal cord exam (15 days later). The T2WI shows no signal abnormalities. Postcontrast T1-weighted image shows no abnormal enhancement, and medullary cone signal seems to be normal on both spinal cord exams (data not shown).

Magnetic resonance of the brain and spinal cord. (A) First brain exam. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images show multiple hyperintensities on the white matter, most evident on the topography of the corticospinal tract, specifically on the corona radiata (A1) and centrum semiovale (A2), thalamus/internal capsule (A3 arrows), and both medial cerebellar peduncles (A4 arrows). (B) First spinal cord exam. The T2-weighted image (T2WI) shows a continuous hyperintensity signal band vertically oriented along cervical (B1 and B3) and thoracic (B2 and B4) segments, with central and ventral distribution (arrows). (C) Second brain exam (15 days later). All patchy areas remain visible on FLAIR images but show decreased signal intensity in comparison to the first exam. No abnormal contrast enhancement or restricted diffusion areas were identified on both exams (data not shown). (D) Second spinal cord exam (15 days later). The T2WI shows no signal abnormalities. Postcontrast T1-weighted image shows no abnormal enhancement, and medullary cone signal seems to be normal on both spinal cord exams (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The analysis of humoral immune response during the acute ZIKV infection showed no differences between the levels of growth factors granulocyte (G)-macrophage CSF and platelet-derived growth factor-BB between acute and recovery phases. However, a remarkable increase of the inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 was found in the CSF during this phase and with the patient presenting tetraparesis and respiratory failure. The same was not observed during the recovery phase when the IL-6 and IL-8 levels returned to normal levels (Table 1). High levels of both cytokines have been shown to be associated with a poorer outcome in patients infected with JEV [8]. These cytokines have also been associated with activation of microglial cells, from which inflammatory products were related to neuronal damage. Indeed, the production of IL-6 and IL-8 could enhance the recruitment of peripheral immune cells to ZIKV-infected sites and contribute to the disruption of the blood-brain barrier, possibly facilitating the dissemination of the virus within the central nervous system. The levels of G-CSF were also increased in the acute phase (up to 9-fold) with a slight decrease in the recovery phase. Granulocyte CSF serves as an autocrine protective signaling mechanism in response to neural injury working as an antiviral cell response that remains in the recovery phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazilian ZIKV has already been phylogenetically associated with JEV [9]. Our clinical, morphological, and biochemistry data support the tropism of ZIKV for the nervous system. Finally, this is the first longitudinal observation of an encephalomyelitis case associated to ZIKV that recapitulates other encephalitis viruses with up-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines that could damage neuron cells. Further studies are needed to better understand the neuropathogenesis of ZIKV infection.
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of CT scan and MRI findings in the diagnosis of Japanese encephalitis.

Authors:  J Kalita; U K Misra
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Acute myelitis due to Zika virus infection.

Authors:  Sylvie Mécharles; Cécile Herrmann; Pascale Poullain; Tuan-Huy Tran; Nathalie Deschamps; Grégory Mathon; Anne Landais; Sébastien Breurec; Annie Lannuzel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study.

Authors:  Guilherme Calvet; Renato S Aguiar; Adriana S O Melo; Simone A Sampaio; Ivano de Filippis; Allison Fabri; Eliane S M Araujo; Patricia C de Sequeira; Marcos C L de Mendonça; Louisi de Oliveira; Diogo A Tschoeke; Carlos G Schrago; Fabiano L Thompson; Patricia Brasil; Flavia B Dos Santos; Rita M R Nogueira; Amilcar Tanuri; Ana M B de Filippis
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly.

Authors:  Jernej Mlakar; Misa Korva; Nataša Tul; Mara Popović; Mateja Poljšak-Prijatelj; Jerica Mraz; Marko Kolenc; Katarina Resman Rus; Tina Vesnaver Vipotnik; Vesna Fabjan Vodušek; Alenka Vizjak; Jože Pižem; Miroslav Petrovec; Tatjana Avšič Županc
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Unusual case of West Nile Virus flaccid paralysis in a 10-year-old child.

Authors:  Farouq I Thabet; Sarah E Servinsky; Fareeha Naz; Teresa E Kovas; Timur O Raghib
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 6.  West Nile virus infection: a new acute paralytic illness.

Authors:  L E Jeha; C A Sila; R J Lederman; R A Prayson; C M Isada; S M Gordon
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in humans with Japanese encephalitis.

Authors:  Peter M Winter; Nguyen Minh Dung; Ha Thi Loan; Rachel Kneen; Bridget Wills; Le Thi Thu; Deborah House; Nicholas J White; Jeremy J Farrar; C Anthony Hart; Tom Solomon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Guillain-Barré Syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in French Polynesia: a case-control study.

Authors:  Van-Mai Cao-Lormeau; Alexandre Blake; Sandrine Mons; Stéphane Lastère; Claudine Roche; Jessica Vanhomwegen; Timothée Dub; Laure Baudouin; Anita Teissier; Philippe Larre; Anne-Laure Vial; Christophe Decam; Valérie Choumet; Susan K Halstead; Hugh J Willison; Lucile Musset; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Philippe Despres; Emmanuel Fournier; Henri-Pierre Mallet; Didier Musso; Arnaud Fontanet; Jean Neil; Frédéric Ghawché
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Acute transverse myelitis (ascending myelitis) as the initial manifestation of Japanese encephalitis: a rare presentation.

Authors:  Varshney Ankur Nandan; Kumar Nilesh; Behera Dibyaranjan; Tiwari Ashutosh; Anand Ravi; Anand Arvind
Journal:  Case Rep Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-25
  9 in total
  14 in total

1.  Modeling neuro-immune interactions during Zika virus infection.

Authors:  Pinar Mesci; Angela Macia; Christopher N LaRock; Leon Tejwani; Isabella R Fernandes; Nicole A Suarez; Paolo M de A Zanotto; Patricia C B Beltrão-Braga; Victor Nizet; Alysson R Muotri
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Neurological Implications of Zika Virus Infection in Adults.

Authors:  Laura S Muñoz; Beatriz Parra; Carlos A Pardo
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Neurological Presentation of Zika Virus Infection Beyond the Perinatal Period.

Authors:  Thomas De Broucker; Alexandra Mailles; Jean-Paul Stahl
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.663

4.  Zika Virus Infects, Activates, and Crosses Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells, without Barrier Disruption.

Authors:  Michelle P Papa; Lana M Meuren; Sharton V A Coelho; Carolina G de Oliveira Lucas; Yasmin M Mustafá; Flavio Lemos Matassoli; Paola P Silveira; Paula S Frost; Paula Pezzuto; Milene R Ribeiro; Amilcar Tanuri; Mauricio L Nogueira; Loraine Campanati; Marcelo T Bozza; Heitor A Paula Neto; Pedro M Pimentel-Coelho; Claudia P Figueiredo; Renato S de Aguiar; Luciana B de Arruda
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Human Zika infection induces a reduction of IFN-γ producing CD4 T-cells and a parallel expansion of effector Vδ2 T-cells.

Authors:  Eleonora Cimini; Concetta Castilletti; Alessandra Sacchi; Rita Casetti; Veronica Bordoni; Antonella Romanelli; Federica Turchi; Federico Martini; Nicola Tumino; Emanuele Nicastri; Angela Corpolongo; Antonino Di Caro; Gary Kobinger; Alimuddin Zumla; Maria Rosaria Capobianchi; Giuseppe Ippolito; Chiara Agrati
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Impact of Zika Virus on adult human brain structure and functional organization.

Authors:  Richard Bido-Medina; Jonathan Wirsich; Minelly Rodríguez; Jairo Oviedo; Isidro Miches; Pamela Bido; Luis Tusen; Peter Stoeter; Sepideh Sadaghiani
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.511

7.  Zika Virus Infection Leads to Demyelination and Axonal Injury in Mature CNS Cultures.

Authors:  Verena Schultz; Stephanie L Cumberworth; Quan Gu; Natasha Johnson; Claire L Donald; George A McCanney; Jennifer A Barrie; Ana Da Silva Filipe; Christopher Linington; Hugh J Willison; Julia M Edgar; Susan C Barnett; Alain Kohl
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 8.  Zika Virus Pathogenesis: A Battle for Immune Evasion.

Authors:  Judith Estévez-Herrera; Silvia Pérez-Yanes; Romina Cabrera-Rodríguez; Daniel Márquez-Arce; Rodrigo Trujillo-González; José-David Machado; Ricardo Madrid; Agustín Valenzuela-Fernández
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22

9.  Analysis of the immunological biomarker profile during acute Zika virus infection reveals the overexpression of CXCL10, a chemokine linked to neuronal damage.

Authors:  Felipe Gomes Naveca; Gemilson Soares Pontes; Aileen Yu-Hen Chang; George Allan Villarouco da Silva; Valdinete Alves do Nascimento; Dana Cristina da Silva Monteiro; Marineide Souza da Silva; Lígia Fernandes Abdalla; João Hugo Abdalla Santos; Tatiana Amaral Pires de Almeida; Matilde Del Carmen Contreras Mejía; Tirza Gabrielle Ramos de Mesquita; Helia Valeria de Souza Encarnação; Matheus de Souza Gomes; Laurence Rodrigues Amaral; Ana Carolina Campi-Azevedo; Jordana Graziela Coelho-Dos-Reis; Lis Ribeiro do Vale Antonelli; Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho; Olindo Assis Martins-Filho; Rajendranath Ramasawmy
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.743

10.  A Novel Mechanism for Zika Virus Host-Cell Binding.

Authors:  Courtney A Rieder; Jonathan Rieder; Sebastién Sannajust; Diana Goode; Ramaz Geguchadze; Ryan F Relich; Derek C Molliver; Tamara E King; James Vaughn; Meghan May
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.