| Literature DB >> 28053823 |
Minjoo Kim1, Sang-Hyun Lee2, Jong Ho Lee3.
Abstract
The effect of weight loss from long-term, mild-calorie diets (MCD) on plasma metabolites is unknown. This study was to examine whether MCD-induced weight reduction caused changes in the extended plasma metabolites. Overweight and obese subjects aged 40-59 years consumed a MCD (approximately 100 kcal/day deficit, n=47) or a weight-maintenance diet (control, n=47) in a randomized, controlled design with a three-year clinical intervention period and plasma samples were analyzed by using UPLC-LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometry. The three-year MCD intervention resulted in weight loss (-8.87%) and significant decreases in HOMA-IR and TG. The three-year follow-up of the MCD group showed reductions in the following 13 metabolites: L-leucine; L-phenylalanine; 9 lysoPCs; PC (18:0/20:4); and SM (d18:0/16:1). The three-year MCD group follow-up identified increases in palmitic amide, oleamide, and PC (18:2/18:2). Considering the age-related alterations in the identified metabolites, the MCD group showed a greater decrease in L-leucine, L-phenylalanine, and SM (d18:0/16:1) compared with those of the control group. Overall, the change (Δ) in BMI positively correlated with the ΔTG, ΔHOMA-IR, ΔL-leucine, and ΔSM (d18:0/16:1). The ΔHOMA-IR positively correlated with ΔTG, ΔL-leucine, ΔL-phenylalanine, and ΔSM (d18:0/16:1). The weight loss resulting from three-year mild-caloric restriction lessens the age-related increase in SM and reduces L-leucine and L-phenylalanine in overweight and obese subjects. These changes were coupled with improved insulin resistance (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02081898).Entities:
Keywords: BMI; L-leucine; L-phenylalanine; mild-calorie diet; sphingomyelin
Year: 2016 PMID: 28053823 PMCID: PMC5198864 DOI: 10.14336/AD.2016.0330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Dis ISSN: 2152-5250 Impact factor: 6.745
Clinical characteristics of participants at baseline and at the end of the three-year clinical intervention period.
| Baseline | Pa | Follow-up | Pb | Change | Pc | Pd | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | MCD | Control | MCD | Control | MCD | |||||
| Weight (kg) | 74.46 ±1.51 | 76.35±1.50 | 0.378 | 74.61±1.49 | 69.58±1.44 | 0.017 | 0.14±0.15 | -6.77±0.37 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Body-mass index (kg/m2) | 27.54±0.22 | 27.78±0.28 | 0.500 | 27.60±0.22 | 25.31±0.27 | <0.001 | 0.06±0.06 | -2.48±0.14 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Waist (cm) | 85.69±0.75 | 87.47±1.03 | 0.167 | 89.19±0.67 | 87.95±0.82 | 0.248 | 3.49±0.79 | 0.48±0.77 | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 121.06±1.97 | 123.43±1.90 | 0.390 | 122.32±1.85 | 125.74±2.05 | 0.218 | 1.26±1.73 | 2.32±2.06 | 0.694 | 0.361 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 74.74±1.46 | 76.04±1.60 | 0.550 | 75.45±1.54 | 76.51±1.49 | 0.621 | 0.70±1.45 | 0.47±1.40 | 0.908 | 0.850 |
| Total-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 203.96±4.55 | 196.36±4.95 | 0.267 | 202.74±4.87 | 196.38±5.21 | 0.336 | -1.21±5.07 | 0.02±3.40 | 0.840 | 0.803 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 129.57±4.77 | 125.82±4.92 | 0.664 | 122.88±4.44 | 126.99±4.53 | 0.621 | -6.69±4.88 | 1.17±3.29 | 0.185 | 0.225 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 44.51±1.74 | 41.83±1.61 | 0.205 | 45.74±1.57 | 46.68±1.82 | 0.786 | 1.23±1.24 | 4.85±1.42 | 0.058 | 0.116 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 149.40±13.80 | 143.57±10.85 | 0.860 | 170.62±14.58 | 113.57±8.70 | 0.001 | 21.21±11.12 | -30.00±9.29 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| Free fatty acid (mEq/L) | 550.64±39.13 | 543.94±30.70 | 0.942 | 546.49±38.41 | 481.79±28.82 | 0.224 | -4.15±37.23 | -62.15±35.76 | 0.264 | 0.157 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 93.89±1.28 | 96.55±1.63 | 0.238 | 94.47±1.46 | 96.40±1.65 | 0.408 | 0.63±1.24 | -0.15±1.39 | 0.677 | 0.958 |
| Insulin (mIU/mL) | 10.07±0.61 | 10.33±0.60 | 0.665 | 10.43±0.82 | 7.56±0.52 | 0.011 | 0.36±0.64 | -2.76±0.57 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.32±0.15 | 2.51±0.17 | 0.403 | 2.44±0.20 | 1.83±0.14 | 0.025 | 0.08±0.16 | -0.67±0.16 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Lp-PLA2 activity (nmol/mL/min) | 28.41±0.95 | 30.16±1.04 | 0.237 | 28.48±0.84 | 31.14±1.21 | 0.151 | 0.07±1.21 | 0.98±1.37 | 0.621 | 0.118 |
Mean ± SE.
tested by logarithmic transformation. P, values derived from independent t-test in baseline. P, values derived from independent t-test in follow-up. P, values derived from independent t- test in changed value. P, values derived from independent t-test in changed value after adjustment for baseline.
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001 derived from paired t-test. HOMA-IR = [Fasting insulin (μIU/mL) × Fasting glucose (mmol/L)] / 22.5.
Figure 1.Non-targeted metabolic pattern analysis. (A) Score plots from PLS-DA models for the control at the baseline (n=47) and the MCD at the baseline (n=47). (B) The score plots from PLS-DA models for the control at the three-year follow-up (n=47) and the MCD at the three-year follow-up (n=47). (C, D) S-plots for covariance [p] and reliability correlations [p(corr)] from PLS-DA models.
Identification of plasma metabolites at baseline and at the end of the three-year clinical intervention period.
| Identity | Formula | Exact | Observed | Normalized peak intensities | 1VIP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n=47) | MCD (n=47) | Baseline versus follow-up | 3 years | |||||||
| Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | Control | MCD | Control | ||||
| Palmitic amide | C16H33NO | 256.2640 | 256.2620 | 452412 | 479348 | 552611 | 1025072 | 0.3872 | 2.4670 | 2.5264 |
| Oleamide | C18H35NO | 282.2797 | 282.2778 | 3493063 | 3693334 | 4383329 | 6112663 | 2.6189 | 8.5897 | 11.1056 |
| LysoPC (16:1) | C24H48NO7P | 494.3247 | 494.3207 | 1159145 | 818604 | 1146221 | 881175 | 1.6500 | 1.2272 | 0.3318 |
| LysoPC (16:0) | C24H50NO7P | 496.3403 | 496.3365 | 14041375 | 10890944 | 14208427 | 12334692 | 15.2491 | 8.6487 | 7.3860 |
| LysoPC (17:0) | C25H52NO7P | 510.3560 | 510.3524 | 782824 | 499767 | 749587 | 502771 | 1.3792 | 1.1782 | 0.1044 |
| LysoPC (18:2) | C26H50NO7P | 520.3403 | 520.3364 | 4814444 | 4183528 | 4902597 | 4346160 | 3.3271 | 2.5860 | 1.1684 |
| LysoPC (18:1) | C26H52NO7P | 522.3560 | 522.3513 | 5037464 | 3992332 | 4946123 | 4160407 | 5.1127 | 3.6578 | 1.1740 |
| LysoPC (18:0) | C26H54NO7P | 524.3716 | 524.3678 | 8458738 | 6851545 | 8050071 | 6189394 | 7.8056 | 8.6314 | 3.4312 |
| LysoPC (20:4) | C28H50NO7P | 544.3403 | 544.3363 | 1495015 | 1228705 | 1486131 | 1254837 | 1.3050 | 1.0721 | 0.2438 |
| LysoPC (20:3) | C28H52NO7P | 546.3560 | 546.3521 | 727631 | 512704 | 661323 | 508098 | 1.0437 | 0.7094 | 0.2232 |
| LysoPC (22:6) | C30H50NO7P | 568.3403 | 568.3362 | 1021202 | 754469 | 1066554 | 838209 | 1.2994 | 1.0725 | 0.3958 |
| PC (16:0/18:2) | C42H80NO8P | 758.5700 | 758.5645 | 1358996 | 1981688 | 1131627 | 1778197 | 3.0264 | 3.5135 | 4.3346 |
| PC (16:0/20:5) | C44H78NO8P | 780.5543 | 780.5493 | 873905 | 908976 | 907979 | 986724 | 0.6923 | 0.7440 | 1.9820 |
| PC (18:2/18:2) | C44H80NO8P | 782.5700 | 782.5651 | 3340338 | 4013326 | 3310428 | 4130013 | 3.8458 | 4.2191 | 0.5501 |
| Lactosylceramide (d18:1/12:0) | C42H79NO13 | 806.5630 | 806.5641 | 3834674 | 4438920 | 3817039 | 4571838 | 3.4856 | 3.5729 | 0.7901 |
| PC (18:0/20:4) | C46H84NO8P | 810.6013 | 810.5955 | 720491 | 586684 | 846008 | 641669 | 0.6498 | 1.1362 | 0.2496 |
Mean ± SE.
*q<0.05,
**q<0.01,
***q<0.001 derived from paired t-test.
†q<0.05,
††q<0.01,
†††q<0.001 derived from independent t-test in follow-up. 1VIP, Variable Important in the Projection. 2amu, atomic mass units.
Figure 2.L-leucine, L-phenylalanine, and SM (d18:0/16:1) at the baseline (□) and three-year follow-up (▢) in control and MCD individuals. Normalized peak intensities ± SE; the changes are different from baseline values. <0.05, <0.01, <0.001 compared with baseline values in each group. <0.05, <0.01, <0.001 compared between two groups at the three-year follow-up.
Figure 3.Correlation matrix of changes (Δ) in metabolites and conventional risk factors in all subjects. The supervised hierarchical clustering plot shows that the 20 most important metabolites stratify the samples according to conventional risk factors. Correlations were obtained by deriving a Spearman correlation coefficient. Metabolites are listed on the left side of the heat map, with conventional risk factors listed across the top. Red is a positive correlation and blue is a negative correlation.