Literature DB >> 28053727

Motor evoked potential and voluntary EMG activity after olfactory mucosal autograft transplantation in a case of chronic, complete spinal cord injury: case report.

Koichi Iwatsuki1, Fumihiro Tajima2, Yoshiyuki Sankai3, Yu-Ichiro Ohnishi1, Takeshi Nakamura2, Masahiro Ishihara1, Koichi Hosomi1, Koshi Ninomiya1, Takashi Moriwaki1, Toshiki Yoshimine1.   

Abstract

The efficacy of olfactory mucosal autografts (OMAs) for chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) has been reported, but there is no report documenting electrophysiological conductivity via the emergence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs). We report the case of a 39-year-old man with chronic, complete SCI at T8, who exhibited MEPs after OMA transplantation, and, with intensive rehabilitation, was ultimately able to ambulate with short leg braces and Lofstrand crutches. The initial injury occurred in a motor vehicle accident in November 1999 and resulted in a complete loss of sensorimotor function below T8. OMA transplantation to the injury site was performed in March 2010 in combination with intensive pre- and postoperative rehabilitation. The patient exhibited voluntary electromyograph (EMG) activity and MEPs at 96 and 144 weeks after transplantation and he was was ambulatory with short leg braces and Lofstrand crutches at 144 weeks after transplantation. We were able to elicit MEPs after OMA with intensive rehabilitation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of recovery of electrophysiological conductivity in the spinal cord after any type of treatment for chronic, complete SCI.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28053727      PMCID: PMC5125064          DOI: 10.1038/scsandc.2015.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases        ISSN: 2058-6124


  23 in total

1.  Progenitor cells of the olfactory receptor neuron lineage.

Authors:  Anne L Calof; Alexandre Bonnin; Candice Crocker; Shimako Kawauchi; Richard C Murray; Jianyong Shou; Hsiao-Huei Wu
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Multiple-channel scaffolds to promote spinal cord axon regeneration.

Authors:  Michael J Moore; Jonathan A Friedman; Eric B Lewellyn; Sara M Mantila; Aaron J Krych; Syed Ameenuddin; Andrew M Knight; Lichun Lu; Bradford L Currier; Robert J Spinner; Richard W Marsh; Anthony J Windebank; Michael J Yaszemski
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Stem cells in CNS and cardiac regeneration.

Authors:  David L Stocum
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.635

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during voluntary action: directional facilitation of outputs and relationships to force generation.

Authors:  Didier Cros; Oscar Soto; Keith H Chiappa
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study.

Authors:  Susan Harkema; Yury Gerasimenko; Jonathan Hodes; Joel Burdick; Claudia Angeli; Yangsheng Chen; Christie Ferreira; Andrea Willhite; Enrico Rejc; Robert G Grossman; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  The anatomic and physiologic bases of motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  P M Rossini
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Limited functional recovery in rats with complete spinal cord injury after transplantation of whole-layer olfactory mucosa: laboratory investigation.

Authors:  Masanori Aoki; Haruhiko Kishima; Kazuhiro Yoshimura; Masahiro Ishihara; Masaki Ueno; Katsuhiko Hata; Toshihide Yamashita; Koichi Iwatsuki; Toshiki Yoshimine
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-02

8.  Distribution and latency of muscle responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex after spinal cord injury in humans.

Authors:  B Calancie; N Alexeeva; J G Broton; S Suys; A Hall; K J Klose
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and the treatment of CNS injury: advantages and possible caveats.

Authors:  Susan C Barnett; John S Riddell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Cryopreserved cells isolated from the adult canine olfactory bulb are capable of extensive remyelination following transplantation into the adult rat CNS.

Authors:  P M Smith; A Lakatos; S C Barnett; N D Jeffery; R J M Franklin
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intramedullary cervical spinal mass after stem cell transplantation using an olfactory mucosal cell autograft.

Authors:  Claire F Woodworth; Gregory Jenkins; Jane Barron; Nanette Hache
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Reconstructing the severed spinal cord.

Authors:  Sergio Canavero; Xiaoping Ren; C-Yoon Kim
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-11-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.