Literature DB >> 28053722

Management of neglected sacral fracture with cauda equina syndrome: report of two cases with review of literature.

R Mahajan1, V Tandon1, K Das1, A Nanda1, R Venkatesh1, H S Chhabra1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed.
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcome of two neglected sacral fractures who presented late to us after 6 weeks of injury with main complaints of incontinence and numbness in sacral region. There are no guidelines for management of complex fractures of sacrum who present late, and available literature is equally perplexing.
METHODS: Patients were evaluated and radiological investigations were done. Anterior-displaced U-shaped fracture was found to be present between S2 and S3 with bony fragments encroaching the canal. Decompression with wide sacral laminectomies was done without any fixation.
RESULTS: Case 1 showed complete recovery of bladder and perineal sensations 6 months post surgery. Second patient (case 2) had partial recovery of bladder control but numbness persisted till last follow-up at 6 months.
CONCLUSION: Neglected fractures of sacrum that present later than 6 weeks post injury with cauda equina syndrome could be given a chance for decompression if imaging shows canal encroachment with bony fragments. Fixation of fracture may not be required in all unstable sacral fractures after 6 weeks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Physiology; Surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 28053722      PMCID: PMC5129421          DOI: 10.1038/scsandc.2015.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases        ISSN: 2058-6124


  9 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of sacral spine fractures.

Authors:  Alexander R Vaccaro; David H Kim; Darrel S Brodke; Mitchel Harris; Jens R Chapman; Thomas Schildhauer; Milton L Routt; Rick C Sasso
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Neglected spinal injuries.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Stabilization of pelvic ring disruptions.

Authors:  M L Routt; P T Simonian; M F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases.

Authors:  F Denis; S Davis; T Comfort
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Sacral fractures.

Authors:  Samir Mehta; Joshua D Auerbach; Christopher T Born; Kingsley R Chin
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Sacral fractures: classification and neurologic implications.

Authors:  C P Sabiston; P C Wing
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1986-12

7.  Neurological injury and patterns of sacral fractures.

Authors:  K J Gibbons; D S Soloniuk; N Razack
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  [The problem of the sacrum fracture. Clinical analysis of 377 cases].

Authors:  T Pohlemann; A Gänsslen; H Tscherne
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 9.  Sacral fractures.

Authors:  H H Schmidek; D A Smith; T K Kristiansen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.654

  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Radiological diagnosis of pelvic ring fractures].

Authors:  Thomas Grieser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.