| Literature DB >> 28053568 |
Preeyaporn Butboonchoo1, Chalobol Wongsawad2.
Abstract
The present study determined the prevalence and distribution of gastrointestinal helminths in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) between November 2012 and August 2013. One hundred and twenty domestic chickens were purchased from villages in four districts of Phayao province; Mae Chai, Dok Khamtai, Chun and Chiang Kham. Morphological differences were used to identify the helminth species, and HAT-RAPD technique was used to differentiate among closely related species. The results revealed that the total prevalence of infection was 99.2%. Cestode and nematode infections showed the highest prevalence in rainy season, while trematode infections were low and only found in hot season. The species and their prevalence were: Ascaridia galli (50.8%), Heterakis gallinarum (86.7%), Prosthogonimus macrorchis (1.7%), Echinostoma revolutum (0.8%), Raillietina echinobothrida (48.3%), Raillietina tetragona (57.5%), Raillietina cesticillus (12.5%), Raillietina sp. (35.8%), Cotugnia chiangmaii (14.2%) and Cotugnia sp. (32.5%). The prevalence of helminth infections did not differ significantly between male and female chickens. HAT-RAPD analysis, the specific fragment of 400 and 250 bp indicated that Raillietina sp. and Cotugnia sp. found, respectively, differ from other closely related species. This study has confirmed that HAT-RAPD technique can be used to differentiate among related species combined with morphological observations.Entities:
Keywords: Domestic chicken; Gallus gallus domesticus; Gastrointestinal helminth; HAT-RAPD; Northern Thailand; Occurrence
Year: 2015 PMID: 28053568 PMCID: PMC5198942 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Figure 1Four districts which were investigated for helminthic infections in domestic chickens (scale 1:700,000).
Figure 2The total prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth in Gallus gallus domesticus from 4 districts of Phayao province during three seasons for one year round.
The prevalence and mean intensity of helminth species in Gallus gallus domesticus from 4 districts.
| Helminth species | District | Host infected | Total | Prevalence (%) | Mean Intensity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence (%) | Male | Female | |||||||
| CK | CH | DKT | MC | ||||||
| 53.3 (16) | 13.3 (7) | 46.7 (14) | 70 (21) | 27 | 31 | 58 | 48.3 | 9.5 | |
| 60 (18) | 66.7 (20) | 23.3 (7) | 80 (24) | 38 | 31 | 69 | 57.5 | 9.1 | |
| 26.7 (8) | 0 | 16.7 (5) | 6.7 (2) | 6 | 9 | 15 | 12.5 | 9.9 | |
| 30 (9) | 23.3 (7) | 43.3 (13) | 46.7 (14) | 23 | 20 | 43 | 35.8 | 10.4 | |
| 0 | 16.7 (5) | 36.7 (11) | 3.3 (1) | 7 | 10 | 17 | 14.2 | 23.7 | |
| 10 (3) | 50 (15) | 53.3 (16) | 16.7 (5) | 17 | 22 | 39 | 32.5 | 5.8 | |
| 0 | 3.3 (1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 1 | |
| 0 | 3.3 (1) | 0 | 3.3 (1) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1.7 | 1 | |
| 40 (12) | 66.7 (20) | 63.3 (19) | 33.3 (10) | 31 | 30 | 61 | 50.8 | 8.7 | |
| 56.7 (17) | 100 (30) | 100 (30) | 90 (27) | 48 | 56 | 104 | 86.7 | 55.7 | |
CK = Chiang Kham, CH = Chun, DKT = Dok Khamtai, MC = Mae Chai, N = number of domestic chicken, () = number of infected domestic chicken.
Figure 3The number and distribution of helminth species in Gallus gallus domesticus from 4 districts.
Details of monomorphic, polymorphic and unique bands, and percentage of polymorphism generated by 6 primers of Raillietina spp.
| Primer | Sequence of oligo 5′–3′ | Range of fragment size (bp) | Unique bands | Polymorphic bands | Monomorphic bands | Total no. of bands | % of polymorphism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPA1 | TGCCGAGCTG | 210–1200 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 100 |
| OPA3 | AGTCAGCCAC | 210–1000 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 100 |
| OPA8 | GTGACGTAGG | 100–1350 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 100 |
| OPA9 | GGGTAACGCC | 210–1750 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 100 |
| OPN9 | TGCCGGCTTG | 400–1200 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 100 |
| OPP11 | AACGCGTCGG | 300–1750 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 100 |
Details of monomorphic, polymorphic and unique bands, and percentage of polymorphism generated by 6 primers of Cotugnia spp.
| Primer | Sequence of oligo 5′–3′ | Range of fragment size (bp) | Unique bands | Polymorphic bands | Monomorphic bands | Total no. of bands | % of polymorphism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPA1 | TGCCGAGCTG | 350–1500 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 83.3 |
| OPA3 | AGTCAGCCAC | 290–1000 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100 |
| OPA8 | GTGACGTAGG | 150–1400 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 83.3 |
| OPA9 | GGGTAACGCC | 210–1500 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 87.5 |
| OPN9 | TGCCGGCTTG | 200–1000 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100 |
| OPP11 | AACGCGTCGG | 310–900 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 80 |
Figure 4HAT-RAPD profiles and markers of 650, 550, 1750, 400, 750, and 250 bp fragments generated by OPA01, OPN09, OPP11, OPA09, OPA03, and OPA08, respectively. Lane L, DNA marker (VC ladder plus 100 bp); lane 1, R. echinobothrida; lane 2, R. tetragona; lane 3, R. cesticillus; lane 4, Raillietina sp.; lane 5, C. chiangmaii; lane 6, Cotugnia sp.; lane 7, H. nana.