Literature DB >> 28053265

Effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (UKUFF): a randomised controlled trial.

A Carr1, C Cooper1, M K Campbell2, J Rees1, J Moser3, D J Beard1, R Fitzpatrick4, A Gray4, J Dawson5, J Murphy5, H Bruhn2, D Cooper2, C Ramsay2.   

Abstract

AIMS: The appropriate management for patients with a degenerative tear of the rotator cuff remains controversial, but operative treatment, particularly arthroscopic surgery, is increasingly being used. Our aim in this paper was to compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic with open repair of the rotator cuff. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 273 patients were recruited to a randomised comparison trial (136 to arthroscopic surgery and 137 to open surgery) from 19 teaching and general hospitals in the United Kingdom. The surgeons used their usual preferred method of repair. The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), two years post-operatively, was the primary outcome measure. Imaging of the shoulder was performed at one year after surgery. The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN97804283.
RESULTS: The mean OSS improved from 26.3 (standard deviation (sd) 8.2) at baseline, to 41.7 (sd 7.9) two years post-operatively for arthroscopic surgery and from 25.0 (sd 8.0) to 41.5 (sd 7.9) for open surgery. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed no statistical difference between the groups at two years (difference in OSS score -0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.75 to 1.22; p = 0.452). The confidence interval excluded the pre-determined clinically important difference in the OSS of three points. The rate of re-tear was not significantly different between the two groups (46.4% for arthroscopic and 38.6% for open surgery; 95% CI -6.9 to 25.8; p = 0.256). Healed repairs had the most improved OSS. These findings were the same when analysed per-protocol.
CONCLUSION: There is no evidence of difference in effectiveness between open and arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. The rate of re-tear is high in both groups, for all sizes of tear and ages and this adversely affects the outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:107-15. ©2017 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic surgery; Open surgery; Randomised controlled trial; Rotator cuff repair

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28053265     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0424.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  28 in total

1.  Mapping the Diffusion of Technology in Orthopaedic Surgery: Understanding the Spread of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel C Austin; Michael T Torchia; Jonathan D Lurie; David S Jevsevar; John-Erik Bell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Mathew Baldwin; Cushla Cooper; Navraj S Nagra; Joanna C Crocker; Molly Glaze; Gemma Greenall; Amar Rangan; Lucksy Kottam; Jonathan L Rees; Dair Farrar-Hockley; Naomi Merritt; Sally Hopewell; David Beard; Michael Thomas; Melina Dritsaki; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Shoulder-specific outcomes 1 year after nontraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Navin Gurnani; Derek F P van Deurzen; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-06-05

Review 4.  Partial and Full-Thickness RCT: Modern Repair Techniques.

Authors:  Amit Nathani; Kevin Smith; Tim Wang
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

5.  Mapping the Oxford Shoulder Score onto the EQ-5D utility index.

Authors:  Jonathan L Rees; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; Epaminondas M Valsamis; David Beard; Andrew Carr; Gary S Collins; Stephen Brealey; Amar Rangan; Rita Santos; Belen Corbacho
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.440

6.  Trends in open shoulder surgery among early career orthopedic surgeons: who is doing what?

Authors:  Daniel P Carpenter; Shawn D Feinstein; Eric D Van Buren; Feng-Chang Lin; Annunziato N Amendola; Robert A Creighton; Ganesh V Kamath
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging based coracoid morphology and its associations with subscapularis tears: a new index.

Authors:  Adam C Watson; Richard P Jamieson; Andrew C Mattin; Richard S Page
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 8.  Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.

Authors:  Mathew Baldwin; Sarah Snelling; Stephanie Dakin; Andrew Carr
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  The Relevance of Open Rotator Cuff Repair in 2021.

Authors:  Khalid D Mohammed; Richard F W Lloyd; Chethan Nagaraj; Jegan Krishnan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Retear rates and clinical outcomes at 1 year after repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears augmented with a bioinductive collagen implant: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Brandon D Bushnell; Patrick M Connor; Howard W Harris; Charles P Ho; Scott W Trenhaile; Jeffrey S Abrams
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.