Literature DB >> 28052620

When can we stop nucleoside analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B?

Chern Hao Chong1, Seng Gee Lim1,2.   

Abstract

Treatment with nucleoside analogue (NAs) is now the most common treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and is recommended by all guidelines. Stopping NAs is a controversial issue in these patients, unless the clinical endpoints of HBeAg seroconversion or HBsAg seroclearance are achieved. While HBeAg seroconversion can occur in a significant number of patients, HBsAg seroclearance rates are low. HBsAg seroclearance is increasingly accepted as the ideal end of treatment, representing a functional cure. Treatment withdrawal leads to relapse in 50% of patients who achieve HBeAg seroconversion and complete at least 12 months of consolidation therapy. In HBeAg negative CHB, the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) stopping rules show that although clinical relapse occurs in approximately 43% and virological relapse occurs in 70%, very few patients experience flare or decompensation. NAs treatment for >2 years was associated with a lower rate of relapse. Recently, stopping NA therapy was shown to be associated with HBsAg in 20%-39% of HBeAg negative patients and more frequently in those with low quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg). However, the most optimal level is unclear. Quantitative HBsAg is becoming a useful tool to predict a sustained response or relapse before stopping therapy. In conclusion, stopping NA therapy is generally safe and can be an option in specific situations such as HBeAg seroconversion. However, it is associated with disease relapse. Thus, patient selection based on qHBsAg may help identify patients who are more likely to achieve HBsAg seroclearance or a sustained response.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antiviral therapy; cessation; hepatitis B flares; nucleos(t)ide analogues; quantitative HBsAg; relapse; seroreversion; treatment withdrawal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28052620     DOI: 10.1111/liv.13314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  6 in total

Review 1.  Novel therapeutic strategies for chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Sandra Phillips; Ravi Jagatia; Shilpa Chokshi
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  KASL clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic hepatitis B.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  The efficacy of addition of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Peg-IFNα-2b is superior to the addition of Entecavir in HBeAg positive CHB patients with a poor response after 12 weeks of Peg-IFNα-2b treatment alone.

Authors:  Sheng Lin; Ya Fu; Wennan Wu; Tianbin Chen; Ningdai Chen; Zhen Xun; Can Liu; Qishui Ou; Yongbin Zeng; Huanhuan Huang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Plus Peginterferon Alfa-2a: Week 120 Analysis.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Ahn; Patrick Marcellin; Xiaoli Ma; Florin A Caruntu; Won Young Tak; Magdy Elkhashab; Wan-Long Chuang; Fehmi Tabak; Rajiv Mehta; Jörg Petersen; William Guyer; Belinda Jump; Alain Chan; Mani Subramanian; Gerald Crans; Scott Fung; Maria Buti; Giovanni B Gaeta; Aric J Hui; George Papatheodoridis; Robert Flisiak; Henry L Y Chan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Comment on "48-Week Outcome after Cessation of Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis B Patient and the Associated Factors with Relapse".

Authors:  Yafei Guo; Lingan Wang
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-01

6.  Negative impact of hepatitis B surface seroclearance on prognosis of hepatitis B-related primary liver cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Lou; Tong Bai; Le-Wei Bi; Ying-Tang Gao; Zhi Du
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.