Literature DB >> 28052504

Weather, habitat composition, and female behavior interact to modify offspring survival in Greater Sage-Grouse.

Daniel Gibson1,2, Erik J Blomberg2,3, Michael T Atamian4, James S Sedinger2.   

Abstract

Weather is a source of environmental variation that can affect population vital rates. However, the influence of weather on individual fitness is spatially heterogeneous and can be driven by other environmental factors, such as habitat composition. Therefore, individuals can experience reduced fitness (e.g., decreased reproductive success) during poor environmental conditions through poor decisions regarding habitat selection. This requires, however, that habitat selection is adaptive and that the organism can correctly interpret the environmental cues to modify habitat use. Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) are an obligate of the sagebrush ecosystems of western North America, relying on sagebrush for food and cover. Greater Sage-Grouse chicks, however, require foods with high nutrient content (i.e., forbs and insects), the abundance of which is both temporally and spatially dynamic and related primarily to water availability. Our goal was to assess whether nest site selection and movements of broods by females reduced the negative effect of drought on offspring survival. As predicted, chick survival was negatively influenced by drought severity. We found that sage-grouse females generally preferred to nest and raise their young in locations where their chicks would experience higher survival. We also found that use of habitats positively associated with chick survival were also positively associated with drought severity, which suggests that females reduced drought impacts on their dependent young by selecting more favorable environments during drought years. Although our findings suggest that female nest site selection and brood movement rates can reduce the negative effects of drought on early offspring survival, the influence of severe drought conditions was not completely mitigated by female behavior, and that drought conditions should be considered a threat to Greater Sage-Grouse population persistence.
© 2016 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Centrocercus urophasianuszzm321990; Greater Sage-Grouse; adaptive habitat selection; bottom-up population regulation; climate change; early offspring survival; environmental variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28052504     DOI: 10.1002/eap.1427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Estimating survival and adoption rates of dependent juveniles.

Authors:  Phillip A Street; Thomas V Riecke; Perry J Williams; Tessa L Behnke; James S Sedinger
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Local and population-level responses of Greater sage-grouse to oil and gas development and climatic variation in Wyoming.

Authors:  Rob R Ramey; Joseph L Thorley; Alexander S Ivey
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Seasonal drought in North America's sagebrush biome structures dynamic mesic resources for sage-grouse.

Authors:  J Patrick Donnelly; Brady W Allred; Daniel Perret; Nicholas L Silverman; Jason D Tack; Victoria J Dreitz; Jeremy D Maestas; David E Naugle
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Habitat selection and potential fitness consequences of two early-successional species with differing life-history strategies.

Authors:  Daniel Catlin; Daniel Gibson; Meryl J Friedrich; Kelsi L Hunt; Sarah M Karpanty; James D Fraser
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Acute and lagged fitness consequences for a sagebrush obligate in a post mega-wildfire landscape.

Authors:  Christopher R Anthony; Lee J Foster; Christian A Hagen; Katie M Dugger
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.