| Literature DB >> 28051771 |
David Benoist1,2, Virginie Dubes1,2, François Roubertie1,2,3, Stephen H Gilbert1,2,4, Sabine Charron1,2, Marion Constantin1,2, Delphine Elbes1,2,5, Delphine Vieillot6, Bruno Quesson1,2, Hubert Cochet1,2,3, Michel Haïssaguerre1,2,3, Caroline Rooryck7, Pierre Bordachar1,2,3, Jean-Benoit Thambo1,2,3, Olivier Bernus1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The growing adult population with surgically corrected tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is at risk of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. We sought to investigate the contribution of right ventricular (RV) structural and electrophysiological remodelling to arrhythmia generation in a preclinical animal model of repaired TOF (rTOF). METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28051771 PMCID: PMC5529985 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart ISSN: 1355-6037 Impact factor: 5.994
Animal weights and CMR characterisation
| Sham, | rTOF, | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N=4 | N=6 | ||
| Body weight (kg) | 48±6 | 61±11 | 0.07 |
| BSA (m2) | 0.93±0.07 | 1.05±0.05 | 0.02 |
| Heart weight/BSA (g/m2) | 202±14 | 283±21 | 0.01 |
| RV weight/BSA (g/m2) | 78±4 | 133±16 | 0.02 |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 117±15 | 98±12 | 0.09 |
| PRF (%) | 0 | 9±7 | 0.03 |
| RV-ESVi (mL/m2) | 37±6 | 122±19 | <0.001 |
| RV-EDVi (mL/m2) | 75±5 | 179±42 | 0.002 |
| RV-SVi (mL/m2) | 39±10 | 57±24 | 0.14 |
| RVEF (%) | 51±11 | 31±6 | 0.03 |
| LVEF (%) | 54±7 | 61±9 | 0.26 |
Data were obtained 23±1 weeks postsurgery. Values are means±SD.
BSA, body surface area; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PRF, pulmonary regurgitation fraction; rTOF, repaired tetralogy of Fallot; RV, right ventricular; RV-EDVi, right ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed to BSA; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; RV-ESVi, right ventricular end-systolic volume indexed to BSA; RV-SVi, right ventricular stroke volume indexed to BSA.
Figure 1RV epicardial and endocardial dispersion of repolarisation. (A) Representative epicardial APD80 maps from a Sham and a rTOF RV. (B) APD80 dispersion was increased in the epicardium but not the endocardium of rTOF RVs compared with Sham. (C) RT dispersion was larger in rTOF epicardium and endocardium than in Sham. (D) Mean APD80 measured over the whole epicardial and endocardial surface were similar in Sham and rTOF RVs. Data are means±SD. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, Sham N=4, rTOF N=5–6. APD, action potential duration; RT, repolarisation time; rTOF, repaired tetralogy of Fallot; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 2Regional action potential duration and gradients in the RV. (A) Epicardial APD20 and APD80 were prolonged in the anterior RV of rTOF pigs compared with Sham (see representative traces). (B) Endocardial APD20 but not APD80 was shorter in the anterior rTOF RV than in Sham (see representative traces). (C) RV transmural APD80 gradient (APD80ENDO–EPI) was reversed and significantly different from Sham in the anterior region while remaining unchanged in rTOF posterior region. (D) RV anteroposterior APD80 gradient (APD80POST–ANT) was reversed in rTOF epicardium and significantly different from Sham epicardial and rTOF endocardial gradients. Data are means±SD. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, Sham N=4, rTOF N=5–6. APD, action potential duration; rTOF, repaired tetralogy of Fallot; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 3Potassium channel expression in the anterior RV. (A) Epicardial mRNA expression level for KCND3 was reduced in rTOF RVs while increased for KCNE2 compared with Sham. (B) Endocardial expression levels for KCND3 and KCNE2 were both increased in rTOF RVs. Kv4.3 protein expression was decreased in the epicardium (C) but increased in the endocardium (D) of rTOF RVs compared with Sham. ***p<0.001, **p<0.01, *p<0.05, Sham N=3–4, rTOF N=3–7. rTOF, repaired tetralogy of Fallot; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 4RV activation in Sham and rTOF preparations. (A) Representative activation maps from a Sham and a rTOF RV with 5 ms-spaced isochrones. Multiple areas of slowed conduction were observed (yellow arrows) throughout rTOF RVs. (B) Epicardial and endocardial activation times were longer in rTOF than in Sham RVs. Epicardial (C) and endocardial (D) CVs were reduced in the longitudinal and transverse directions of propagation in rTOF compared with Sham preparations. Data are means±SD. **p<0.01, *p<0.05, Sham N=4, rTOF N=5–6. ENDO, endocardial; EPI, epicardial; CV, conduction velocity; rTOF, repaired tetralogy of Fallot; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 5Cx43 expression and localisation. (A) Cx43 protein expression was decreased in the epicardium but not the endocardium (B) of rTOF RVs compared with Sham. (C) Immunolabelling revealed the presence of Cx43 at the lateral membrane (grey arrows) in rTOF endocardial sections as opposed to the intercalated disc distribution (white arrows) seen in Sham sections. Data are means±SD. **p<0.01, Sham N=3, rTOF N=3. ENDO, endocardial; EPI, epicardial; Cx43, Connexin-43; rTOF, repaired tetralogy of Fallot; RV, right ventricle.
Figure 6Collagen content in Sham and rTOF right ventricles. (A) Histological sections stained with Masson's Trichrome showing a greater collagen staining (blue) and a disorganised myocardial structure in the rTOF RV. (B) Collagen content was increased in rTOF RVs compared with Sham. RV endocardial activation time correlated linearly with RV-EDVi (C) and collagen content (D). Data are means±SD. *p<0.05, Sham N=4, rTOF N=4–6. ENDO, endocardial; EDVi, end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area; rTOF, repaired tetralogy of Fallot; RV, right ventricle.