| Literature DB >> 28051026 |
Ying Wang1, Min Liu2, Mu-Lan Jin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) is a functional MRI technique which involves using the paramagnetic properties of deoxyhemoglobin to image the local tissue oxygen concentration. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether BOLD-MRI could evaluate hypoxia and angiogenesis of breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28051026 PMCID: PMC5221115 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.196570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1Magnetic resonance imaging and immunostaining in a 48-year-old female with right invasive ductal carcinoma in Grade III. (a) Contrasted-magnetic resonance imaging showing an irregular mass with the heterogeneous enhancement in the right breast (red arrow). (b) Blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging showing the mass with heterogeneous intensity (red arrow) with a mean value of 65.3 Hz. (c) Immunostaining of carbonic anhydrase IX showing the strong positive expression of carbonic anhydrase IX in invasive ductal carcinoma (original magnification ×200). (d) Immunostaining of vascular endothelial growth factor showing the moderate positive expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in invasive ductal carcinoma (original magnification ×200).
Figure 2Magnetic resonance imaging and immunostaining in a 36-year-old female with right invasive ductal carcinoma in Grade II. (a) Contrasted-magnetic resonance imaging showing an irregular mass with the heterogeneous enhancement in right breast (red arrow). (b) Blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging showing the mass with heterogeneous intensity (red arrow) with a mean value of 52.1 Hz. (c) Immunostaining of carbonic anhydrase IX showing the moderate positive expression of carbonic anhydrase IX in invasive ductal carcinoma (original magnification ×200). (d) Immunostaining of vascular endothelial growth factor showing the weak expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in invasive ductal carcinoma (original magnification ×200).
Correlation between R2* value and prognostic factors
| Prognostic factors | R2* (Hz) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||||
| ≤24.0 | 59 | 52.7 ± 18.7 | 0.793* ( | |
| 24.1–28.9 | 25 | 51.4 ± 19.8 | 0.538† ( | |
| ≥29.0 | 14 | 55.4 ± 17.1 | 0.630‡ ( | |
| Tumour Size (mm) | ||||
| ≤20.0 | 56 | 47.1 ± 18.1 | −4.051 | 0.000 |
| 20.1–50.0 | 42 | 61.7 ± 16.0 | ||
| Histological grade | ||||
| I | 4 | 49.7 ± 17.5 | ||
| II | 62 | 55.1 ± 17.7 | 0.416 | 0.678§ |
| III | 32 | 53.4 ± 16.4 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| Positive | 48 | 58.1 ± 16.7 | 2.882 | 0.005 |
| Negative | 50 | 47.6 ± 19.1 |
BMI: ANOVA F = 0.064, P = 0.940; LSD-t test: *BMI ≤24.0 kg/m2 and BMI 24.1–28.9 kg/m2;†BMI 24.1–28.9 kg/m2 and BMI ≥29.0 kg/m2; ‡BMI ≤24.0 kg/m2 and BMI ≥29.0 kg/m2; Histological grade: Mann–Whitney U test: §grade II and grade III.
Correlation between R2* value and Carbonic anhydrase IX expression
| CA IX expression | R2* value Mean ± Std (Hz) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | 12 | 37.4 ± 9.23 | |
| Weakly positive | 17 | 37.9 ± 15.7 | |
| Moderately positive | 28 | 54.5 ± 11.0 | |
| Strong positive | 41 | 63.3 ± 19.2 | |
| 13.915 ( |
R2* value, LSD-t test: *Negative group and weakly positive group; †Weakly group and strong group, ‡Negative group and moderately positive group; §Negative group and strong positive group; Weakly positive group and moderately positive group: t = −4.235, P<0.001; moderately group and strong group: t = −2.118, P = 0.038.
Correlation between R2* value and Vascular endothelial growth factor expression
| VEGF expression | R2* value Mean ± Std (Hz) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | 8 | 56.1 ± 18.0 | |
| Weakly positive | 18 | 45.4 ± 18.9 | |
| Moderately positive | 34 | 56.4 ± 16.5 | |
| Strong positive | 38 | 54.8 ± 19.8 | |
| 1.895 (0.136) |
R2* value, LSD-t test: *Negative group and weakly positive group; †Weakly group and strong group; ‡Negative group and moderately positive group; §Negative group and strong positive group; Weakly positive group and moderately positive group: t = –2.407, P = 0.020; moderately group and strong group: t = 0.377, P = 0.707.