Literature DB >> 28050977

Influence of Age on Factors associated with Peri-implant Bone Loss after Prosthetic Rehabilitation over Osseointegrated Implants.

Rejane El Pedro1, João P De Carli2, Maria Ss Linden2, Igor Fp Lima3, Luiz R Paranhos4, Max D Costa5, Ângelo Jg Bós1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To verify the influence of age on factors associated with peri-implant bone loss after prosthetic rehabilitation over osseointegrated implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an analytical, observational, and longitudinal study with initial 23 participants. Patients presenting with osseointegrated implants with their respective prostheses installed were included, and they could be carriers of chronic and degenerative diseases, such as diabetes, osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and systemic arterial hypertension. Thus, 18 participants with 57 implants were selected and followed up from 2009 to 2013. For statistical analysis, chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for the association of systemic conditions and bone loss. Student's t-test was used for mean comparisons of age and number of total upper and lower implants.
RESULTS: The average age of the sample studied was 71.05 years (65-80). The average implant per person was 3.2. Smoking had an influence on both mesial and distal bone loss, and the latter was significant (p = 0.0370). The association between bone loss and gender was also significant (p < 0.05). Moreover, male gender and upper implants were factors significantly associated with bone loss. The systemic conditions, when isolated, did not have significant influence on implant survival.
CONCLUSION: Age is not a factor that, alone, contraindicates implant-rehabilitating therapy. On the contrary, smoking has a significant influence on dental implant survival. Systemic diseases, such as osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, diabetes, hypertension, and heart diseases, when controlled, are not contraindication factors. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study is relevant for assessing peri-implant bone loss in elderly patients, right after implant installation and over time. Therefore, it was possible to verify that age is not a limiting factor for this procedure. Controlled systemic diseases do not contraindicate implant installation, but smoking is a factor that affects implant survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Case-control study; Chronic disease; Dental implants; Implants; Prostheses Risk factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28050977     DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract        ISSN: 1526-3711


  5 in total

Review 1.  Patients with Thyroid Disorder, a Contraindication for Dental Implants? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aina Torrejon-Moya; Keila Izquierdo-Gómez; Mario Pérez-Sayáns; Enric Jané-Salas; Antonio Marí Roig; José López-López
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Marginal bone loss around crestal or subcrestal dental implants: prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Naser Sargolzaie; Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Hamidreza Arab; Tahereh Koohestani; Mahdiye Fasihi Ramandi
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Sara Hussain Alhammadi; Girvan Burnside; Alexander Milosevic
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  Systematic review on diabetes mellitus and dental implants: an update.

Authors:  Juliane Wagner; Johannes H Spille; Jörg Wiltfang; Hendrik Naujokat
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-01-03

5.  THE EFFECT OF LOCAL AND SYSTEMIC FACTORS ON DENTAL IMPLANT FAILURE - ANALYSIS OF 670 PATIENTS WITH 1260 IMPLANTS.

Authors:  Željko Rotim; Ivica Pelivan; Ivan Sabol; Mato Sušić; Amir Ćatić; Andrija Petar Bošnjak
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 0.780

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.