| Literature DB >> 28050848 |
Iris K U Adam1, Márcia Duarte2, Jananan Pathmanathan3,4, Anja Miltner1, Thomas Brüls3,4, Matthias Kästner5.
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are distributed ubiquitously in the environment and form metabolites toxic to most organisms. Organic amendment of PAH contaminated soil with compost and farmyard manure has proven to be efficient for PAH bioremediation mediated by native microorganisms, even though information on the identity of PAH degraders in organic-amended soil is still scarce. Here we provide molecular insight into the bacterial communities in soil amended with compost or farmyard manure for which the degradation mass balances of 13C-labeled pyrene have been recently published and assess the relevant bacterial genera capable of degrading pyrene as a model PAH. We performed statistical analyses of bacterial genera abundance data based on total DNA and RNA (for comparison) extracted from the soil samples. The results revealed complex pyrene degrading communities with low abundance of individual degraders instead of a limited number of abundant key players. The bacterial degrader communities of the soil-compost mixture and soil fertilized with farmyard manure differed considerably in composition albeit showing similar degradation kinetics. Additional analyses were carried out on enrichment cultures and enabled the reconstruction of several nearly complete genomes, thus allowing to link microcosm and enrichment experiments. However, pyrene mineralizing bacteria enriched from the compost or unfertilized soil-compost samples did not dominate pyrene degradation in the soils. Based on the present findings, evaluations of PAH degrading microorganisms in complex soil mixtures with high organic matter content should not target abundant key degrading species, since the specific degraders may be highly diverse, of low abundance, and masked by high bacterial background.Entities:
Keywords: Biodegradation; Compost; DNA; Farmyard manure; Microbial communities; Pyrene; RNA; Stable isotope probing
Year: 2017 PMID: 28050848 PMCID: PMC5209307 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-016-0306-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Degradation of [13C6]-pyrene and estimated 13C-incorporation into living microbial biomass based on phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis in soil-compost mixture and fertilized soil (controls not shown; see Adam et al. 2015)
| Soil-compost mixture | Fertilized soil | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation time [d] | [13C6]-pyrene [% of initial] | 13C incorporation into microbial biomass based on PLFA [% of initial] | Incubation time [d] | [13C6]-pyrene [% of initial] | 13C incorporation into microbial biomass based on PLFA [% of initial] |
|
|
|
| 0 | 100 | 1 ± 0 |
|
|
|
| 16 | 96.6 ± 6.8 | 0 ± 1 |
|
|
|
| 31 | 95.7 ± 10.4 | 1 ± 0 |
| 64 | 11.8 ± 0.9 | 14 ± 1 |
|
|
|
| 80 | 6.5 ± 2.3 | 13 ± 1 | 71 | 34.1 ± 6.3 | 6 ± 1 |
| 96 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 13 ± 0 | 95 | 23.1 ± 8.9 | 10 ± 1 |
|
|
|
| 161 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 10 ± 0 |
| 203 | 4.2 ± 0.6 | 6 ± 1 | |||
Incubation times at which matrix DNA and RNA were extracted are printed italics-faced. Values are indicated as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3)
Genome completeness estimates and phylogenetic anchoring of the genomes reconstructed from the enrichment cultures UC1 and UC10, derived from the soil-compost mixture
| Genome completeness statistics computed by check using lineage specific marker gene sets | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bin identifier | Marker lineage | Number of genomes | Number of markers | Number of marker sets | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5+ | Completeness [%] | Contamination [%] | Strain heterogeneity [%] |
|
| |||||||||||||
| B4 | o__ | 26 | 569 | 293 | 4 | 556 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.50 | 2.29 | 0.00 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| B3 | f__ | 55 | 659 | 290 | 6 | 652 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.72 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| A2 | o__ | 69 | 400 | 198 | 1 | 398 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.49 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
|
| |||||||||||||
| B2 | o__ | 120 | 572 | 265 | 5 | 563 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 99.56 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Phylogenetic assignments are based on full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences
Descriptive statistics from binning the unassembled reads generated from the enrichment culture UC10 derived from the soil-compost mixture
| Binning results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bin identifier | Classified reads (total = 180,155,076) | Abundance estimate | Fraction of binned reads mapped on reconstructed genomes (%) | Breakdown of column 4 into distinct reconstructed genomes |
| bin_1 | 168,591,494 | 1.389 | 82 | 82% |
| bin_2 | 9,445,028 | 51 | 97 | 97% |
| bin_3 | 1,870,808 | 19 | 98 | 72% |
| bin_4 | 1,331,276 | 11 | 98 | 76% |
| bin_5 | 247,746 | 1 | 47 | 42% |
| Fraction of total unassembled reads of the enrichment culture mapped to | ||||
| | 76.52% | |||
| | 5.12% | |||
| | 1.04% | |||
| | 0.83% | |||
Fig. 1Percentage of relative abundances of bacterial classes based on 16S rDNA amplicons from extracted RNA (cDNA) (a) and DNA (b) of controls (C) and pyrene treatment (P) of unfertilized soil-compost mixture (UC) at day 0, 35, 48 and 160 and of fertilized soil (F) at day 46. The relative abundance values are indicated as means of triplicate control and pyrene treatment samples from soil-compost mixture with standard deviations of ≤4 and ≤3%, respectively, for each class, and duplicate controls and triplicate pyrene treatment samples from fertilized soil with standard deviations of ≤5 and ≤1%, respectively, for each class. For the fertilized soil, the relative abundance values are indicated as means of duplicate control and pyrene treatment samples with standard deviations of ≤6 and ≤2%, respectively, for each class. “Others” include all classes with abundances of less than 3% in all samples. Bacteriodetes_i.s. Bacteriodetes incertae sedis (member of Bacteriodetes of uncertain class), un unclassified
Fig. 2Cluster dendrograms based on distance matrices using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of standardized genera abundance data based on 16S rDNA amplicons from extracted DNA (a) and RNA (cDNA) (b) of unfertilized soil-compost mixture (UC) at days 0, 35, 48 and 160 by the UPGMA agglomeration algorithm (for details see M&M section). Triplicate DNA from controls is designated as DC1 to DC3 and from pyrene treatment is designated as DP1 to DP3. (Cluster analysis of RNA was performed on pooled samples from triplicate controls (C) and pyrene treatment (P) and is used for comparison purpose only)
Fig. 3Cluster dendrograms based on distance matrices using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of standardized genera abundance data based on 16S rDNA amplicons from extracted DNA (a) and RNA (cDNA) for comparison (b) of fertilized soil (F) at day 46 by the UPGMA agglomeration algorithm. Duplicate DNA from controls is designated as DC1 and DC2 and of RNA as RC1 and RC2; triplicate DNA from pyrene treatment is designated as DP1 to DP3 and of RNA as RP1 to RP3
Indicator genera significantly associated with pyrene treatment in the soil-compost mixture at day 48 and in fertilized soil at day 46, using group-equalized point-biserial correlation coefficients (Phi coefficient) computed from genera relative abundance data derived from 16S rDNA amplicon libraries from extracted DNA and from RNA (cDNA) for comparison, with indication of the significance p value
| Taxonomy | Statistics | Biology and PAH degradation potential | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Class | Phi coeff. |
| Gram | Indications for PAH degradation | References |
| Soil-compost mixture, 48 days incubation | ||||||
| |
| 0.786 | 0.035 | + | Nap, Phe | Daane et al. ( |
| |
| 0.744 | 0.035 | − | − | − |
| Gp21 |
| 0.787 | 0.035 | − |
| Xu et al. ( |
| |
| 0.721 | 0.035 | − | Nap, Phe | Maeda et al. ( |
| |
| 0.801 | 0.035 | + | Nap, Phe | Balachandran et al. ( |
| |
| 0.690 | 0.035 | + | − | − |
| |
| 0.751 | 0.035 | + | ||
| Fertilized soil, 46 days incubation | ||||||
| |
| 0.908 | 0.008 | + | (PAH enrichment) | HuiJie et al. ( |
| |
| 0.623 | 0.030 | − | (Isolated from oil conta-minated site) | Young et al. ( |
| |
| 0.560 | 0.037 | + | Nap, Ace, Ant, Flt, Pyr, B[e]p | e.g. Annweiler et al. ( |
| |
| 0.614 | 0.048 | + | − | − |
| |
| 0.859 | 0.008 | − | (Growing on mineral oil) | Borzenkov et al. ( |
| |
| 0.940 | 0.008 | − | Nap, Phe | Maeda et al. ( |
| |
| 0.675 | 0.035 | − | Flu, Phe | Wang et al. ( |
| |
| 0.800 | 0.026 | + | Phe, Pyr, Chr | Gauthier et al. ( |
| |
| 0.847 | 0.008 | + | Nap, Flu, Phe, Ant, Flt, Pyr, B[a]p | e.g. Bogan et al. ( |
| |
| 0.819 | 0.008 | − | Flu, Phe, Ant, Flt, Pyr, B[a]a, Chr, B[b]f, B[a]p | Sohn ( |
| |
| 0.745 | 0.019 | − | (enriched in crude oil amended soil) | Yang et al. ( |
| |
| 0.891 | 0.010 | − | Phe | Patel et al. ( |
| |
| 0.755 | 0.017 | − | − | − |
| |
| 0.802 | 0.023 | − | Nap, Acy, Ace, Phe, Ant, Flt, Pyr, Chr, B[a]p | e.g. Coppotelli et al. ( |
| |
| 0.739 | 0.013 | + | − | − |
| |
| 0.793 | 0.008 | + | − | − |
| |
| 0.823 | 0.012 | − | ||
| |
| 0.740 | 0.032 | − | ||
| |
| 0.819 | 0.008 | − | ||
Indicator genera are compared to literature concerning PAH degradation potential
coeff coefficient, Ref reference, un unclassified; Nap naphthalene, Acy acenaphthylene, Ace acenaphthene, Flu fluorene, Phe phenanthrene, Ant anthracene, Flt fluoranthene, Pyr pyrene, B[a]a benzo[a]anthracene, Chr chrysene, B[b]f benzo[b]fluoranthene, B[a]p benzo[a]pyrene, B[e]p benzo[e]pyrene