Akos Varga-Szemes1, Rob J van der Geest2, U Joseph Schoepf3, Bruce S Spottiswoode4, Carlo N De Cecco1, Giuseppe Muscogiuri1,5, Julian L Wichmann1,6, Stefanie Mangold1,7, Stephen R Fuller1, Pal Maurovich-Horvat8, Bela Merkely8, Sheldon E Litwin9, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart1,10, Pal Suranyi1. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Drive, Charleston, SC, 29425-2260, USA. schoepf@musc.edu. 4. Siemens Medical Solutions, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Department of Imaging, Bambino Gesu Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy. 6. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. 7. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. 8. MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. 9. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 10. Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of inversion time (TI) on the precision of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) quantification using synthetic inversion recovery (IR) imaging in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Fifty-three patients with suspected prior MI underwent 1.5-T cardiac MRI with conventional magnitude (MagIR) and phase-sensitive IR (PSIR) LGE imaging and T1 mapping at 15 min post-contrast. T1-based synthetic MagIR and PSIR images were calculated with a TI ranging from -100 to +150 ms at 5-ms intervals relative to the optimal TI (TI0). LGE was quantified using a five standard deviation (5SD) and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) thresholds. Measurements were compared using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The MagIRsy technique provided precise assessment of LGE area at TIs ≥ TI0, while precision was decreased below TI0. The LGE area showed significant differences at ≤ -25 ms compared to TI0 using 5SD (P < 0.001) and at ≤ -65 ms using the FWHM approach (P < 0.001). LGE measurements did not show significant difference over the analysed TI range in the PSIRsy images using either of the quantification methods. CONCLUSIONS: T1 map-based PSIRsy images provide precise quantification of MI independent of TI at the investigated time point post-contrast. MagIRsy-based MI quantification is precise at TI0 and at longer TIs while showing decreased precision at TI values below TI0. KEY POINTS: • Synthetic IR imaging retrospectively generates LGE images at any theoretical TI • Synthetic IR imaging can simulate the effect of TI on LGE quantification • Fifteen minutes post-contrast MagIR sy accurately quantifies infarcts from TI 0 to TI 0 + 150 ms • Fifteen minutes post-contrast PSIR sy provides precise infarct size independent of TI • Synthetic IR imaging has further advantages in reducing operator dependence.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of inversion time (TI) on the precision of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) quantification using synthetic inversion recovery (IR) imaging in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Fifty-three patients with suspected prior MI underwent 1.5-T cardiac MRI with conventional magnitude (MagIR) and phase-sensitive IR (PSIR) LGE imaging and T1 mapping at 15 min post-contrast. T1-based synthetic MagIR and PSIR images were calculated with a TI ranging from -100 to +150 ms at 5-ms intervals relative to the optimal TI (TI0). LGE was quantified using a five standard deviation (5SD) and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) thresholds. Measurements were compared using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The MagIRsy technique provided precise assessment of LGE area at TIs ≥ TI0, while precision was decreased below TI0. The LGE area showed significant differences at ≤ -25 ms compared to TI0 using 5SD (P < 0.001) and at ≤ -65 ms using the FWHM approach (P < 0.001). LGE measurements did not show significant difference over the analysed TI range in the PSIRsy images using either of the quantification methods. CONCLUSIONS: T1 map-based PSIRsy images provide precise quantification of MI independent of TI at the investigated time point post-contrast. MagIRsy-based MI quantification is precise at TI0 and at longer TIs while showing decreased precision at TI values below TI0. KEY POINTS: • Synthetic IR imaging retrospectively generates LGE images at any theoretical TI • Synthetic IR imaging can simulate the effect of TI on LGE quantification • Fifteen minutes post-contrast MagIR sy accurately quantifies infarcts from TI 0 to TI 0 + 150 ms • Fifteen minutes post-contrast PSIR sy provides precise infarct size independent of TI • Synthetic IR imaging has further advantages in reducing operator dependence.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Late gadolinium enhancement; Myocardial infarct; Synthetic inversion recovery; T1 mapping
Authors: O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hui Xue; Andreas Greiser; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Jens Guehring; Andrew E Arai; Peter Kellman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Hui Xue; Saurabh Shah; Andreas Greiser; Christoph Guetter; Arne Littmann; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Andrew E Arai; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Jens Guehring; Peter Kellman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zsofia Lenkey; Akos Varga-Szemes; Tamas Simor; Rob J van der Geest; Robert Kirschner; Levente Toth; Tamas Bodnar; Brigitta C Brott; Ada Elgavish; Gabriel A Elgavish Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Akos Varga-Szemes; Tamas Simor; Zsofia Lenkey; Rob J van der Geest; Robert Kirschner; Levente Toth; Brigitta C Brott; Ada Elgavish; Gabriel A Elgavish Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Louise Thomson; Stefan Hager; Gabriel Meinhardt; Wolfgang Rehwald; Michele Parker; Dipan Shah; Udo Sechtem; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-04-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Akos Varga-Szemes; Rob J van der Geest; Bruce S Spottiswoode; Pal Suranyi; Balazs Ruzsics; Carlo N De Cecco; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Paola M Cannaò; Mary A Fox; Julian L Wichmann; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira; Erica Dall'Armellina; Lowri E Cochlin; Andreas Greiser; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Aernout M Beek; Olga Bondarenko; Farshid Afsharzada; Albert C van Rossum Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Sebastian Gassenmaier; Rob J van der Geest; U Joseph Schoepf; Pal Suranyi; Wolfgang G Rehwald; Carlo N De Cecco; Domenico Mastrodicasa; Moritz H Albrecht; Domenico De Santis; Virginia W Lesslie; Balazs Ruzsics; Akos Varga-Szemes Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Sebastian Weingartner; Omer Burak Demirel; Chetan Shenoy; Lothar R Schad; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Mehmet Akcakaya Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2019-07
Authors: Suji Lee; Panki Kim; Dong Jin Im; Young Joo Suh; Yoo Jin Hong; Byoung Wook Choi; Young Jin Kim Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: Sebastian Weingärtner; Ömer B Demirel; Francisco Gama; Iain Pierce; Thomas A Treibel; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Mehmet Akçakaya Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-29
Authors: Randy van Dijk; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Theodorus A M Kaandorp; Paul R M van Dijkman; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Pim van der Harst; Matthijs Oudkerk Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 5.315