Rebecca A P Dijkhoff1, Monique Maas2, Milou H Martens3, Nikolaos Papanikolaou4, Doenja M J Lambregts5, Geerard L Beets6, Regina G H Beets-Tan5. 1. Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. moniquemaas@live.nl. 3. Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5500, 6130 MB, Sittard, The Netherlands. 4. Division for Medical Imaging and Technology, Institute for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. 5. Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in rectal cancer patients, both in a primary staging and restaging setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients were included with DCE-MRI before and/or after neoadjuvant therapy. DCE-MRI was performed with gadofosveset trisodium (Ablavar®, Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). Regions of interest were placed in the tumor and quantitative parameters were extracted with Olea Sphere 2.2 software permeability module using the extended Tofts model. Semiquantitative parameters were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Spearman rank correlation tests were used for assessment of correlation between parameters. A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Strong positive correlations were found between mean peak enhancement and mean K trans: 0.79 (all patients, p<0.0001), 0.83 (primary staging, p = 0.003), and 0.81 (restaging, p = 0.054). Mean wash-in correlated significantly with mean V p and K ep (0.79 and 0.58, respectively, p<0.0001 and p = 0.009) in all patients. Mean wash-in showed a significant correlation with mean K ep (0.67, p = 0.033) in the primary staging group. On the restaging MRI, mean wash-in only strongly correlated with mean V p (0.81, p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: This study shows a strong correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in DCE-MRI for rectal cancer. Peak enhancement correlates strongly with K trans and wash-in showed strong correlation with V p and K ep. These parameters have been reported to predict tumor aggressiveness and response in rectal cancer. Therefore, semiquantitative analyses might be a surrogate for quantitative analyses.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in rectal cancerpatients, both in a primary staging and restaging setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients were included with DCE-MRI before and/or after neoadjuvant therapy. DCE-MRI was performed with gadofosvesettrisodium (Ablavar®, Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). Regions of interest were placed in the tumor and quantitative parameters were extracted with Olea Sphere 2.2 software permeability module using the extended Tofts model. Semiquantitative parameters were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Spearman rank correlation tests were used for assessment of correlation between parameters. A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Strong positive correlations were found between mean peak enhancement and mean K trans: 0.79 (all patients, p<0.0001), 0.83 (primary staging, p = 0.003), and 0.81 (restaging, p = 0.054). Mean wash-in correlated significantly with mean V p and K ep (0.79 and 0.58, respectively, p<0.0001 and p = 0.009) in all patients. Mean wash-in showed a significant correlation with mean K ep (0.67, p = 0.033) in the primary staging group. On the restaging MRI, mean wash-in only strongly correlated with mean V p (0.81, p = 0.054). CONCLUSION: This study shows a strong correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in DCE-MRI for rectal cancer. Peak enhancement correlates strongly with K trans and wash-in showed strong correlation with V p and K ep. These parameters have been reported to predict tumor aggressiveness and response in rectal cancer. Therefore, semiquantitative analyses might be a surrogate for quantitative analyses.