| Literature DB >> 28049483 |
Anna E M F M Oliveira1,2, Jonatas L Duarte1,2, Rodrigo A S Cruz1,2, Raimundo N P Souto3, Ricardo M A Ferreira3, Taires Peniche3, Edemilson C da Conceição4, Leandra A R de Oliveira4, Silvia M M Faustino5, Alexandro C Florentino6, José C T Carvalho1,2, Caio P Fernandes7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preparation of nanoformulations using natural products as bioactive substances is considered very promising for innovative larvicidal agents. On this context, oil in water nanoemulsions develop a main role, since they satisfactorily disperse poor-water soluble substances, such as herbal oils, in aqueous media. Pterodon emarginatus, popularly known as sucupira, has a promising bioactive oleoresin. However, to our knowledge, no previous studies were carried out to evaluate its potential against Culex quinquefasciatus, the main vector of the tropical neglected disease called lymphatic filariasis or elephantiasis. Thus, we aimed to investigate influence of different pairs of surfactants in nanoemulsion formation and investigate if a sucupira oleoresin-based nanoemulsion has promising larvicidal activity against this C. quinquefasciatus. We also evaluated morphological alteration, possible mechanism of insecticidal action and ecotoxicity of the nanoemulsion against a non-target organism.Entities:
Keywords: Larvicidal; Nanoemulsion; Oleoresin; Sucupira
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28049483 PMCID: PMC5209835 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-016-0234-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Droplet size, polydispersity index and zeta potential of nanoemulsions prepared with sucupira oleoresin and different pairs of surfactants (rHLB = 11)
| Size (nm) | PDI | Zeta potential (mV) | Size (nm) | PDI | Zeta potential (mV) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 1 | ||||||
| T80 | S80 | 151.0 ± 2.252 | 0.221 ± 0.006 | −32.5 ± 1.07 | 146.3 ± 1.450 | 0.219 ± 0.005 | −30.5 ± 0.819 |
| T20 | S80 | 2540.0 ± 996.7 | 1.000 ± 0.000 | −52.6 ± 4.14 | 1461.0 ± 470.8 | 1.000 ± 0.000 | −43.8 ± 0.603 |
| T80 | TS | 160.7 ± 1.493 | 0.252 ± 0.012 | −29.2 ± 0.346 | 159.8 ± 3.46 | 0.277 ± 0.027 | −31.4 ± 0.404 |
| T20 | TS | 650.0 ± 663.9 | 0.756 ± 0.200 | −31.3 ± 1.08 | 526.2 ± 397.2 | 0.601 ± 0.194 | −34.3 ± 1.11 |
| MP400 | 223.7 ± 28.69 | 0.391 ± 0.034 | −43.2 ± 0.82 | 352.3 ± 198.8 | 0.536 ± 0.078 | −40.6 ± 1.10 | |
| MP600 | DP600 | 507.1 ± 171.6 | 0.576 ± 0.109 | −35.8 ± 1.00 | 345.1 ± 161.1 | 0.568 ± 0.025 | −30.3 ± 0.34 |
| MP600 | DP400 | 464.9 ± 176.1 | 0.569 ± 0.085 | −44.0 ± 0.351 | 345.7 ± 83.2 | 0.476 ± 0.078 | −39.3 ± 0.569 |
| T20 | DP600 | 750.8 ± 238.2 | 0.763 ± 0.063 | −40.7 ± 0.451 | 322.6 ± 49.73 | 0.579 ± 0.092 | −35.5 ± 0.200 |
| T20 | DP400 | 460.2 ± 134.6 | 0.608 ± 0.125 | −52.2 ± 1.38 | 484.1 ± 59.68 | 0.576 ± 0.103 | −51.6 ± 1.71 |
| T80 | DP600 | 1055 ± 65.11 | 0.779 ± 0.026 | −14.3 ± 0.289 | 898.2 ± 141.1 | 0.921 ± 0.136 | −37.3 ± 0.208 |
| T80 | DP400 | 248.3 ± 30.51 | 0.605 ± 0.157 | −49.7 ± 1.16 | 214.5 ± 18.6 | 0.504 ± 0.060 | −44.0 ± 3.67 |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
T80 = polysorbate 80. S80 = sorbitan monooleate. T20 = polysorbate 20. TS = sorbitan trioleate. DP400 = polyethyleneglycol 400 dioleate. DP600 = polyethyleneglycol 600 dioleate. MP400 = polyethyleneglycol 400 monooleate. MP600 = polyethyleneglycol 600 monooleate
Fig. 1Particle size distribution of P. emarginatus nanoemulsions prepared with different surfactant pairs. Mean droplet size S80/T80. Day 0: 151.0 ± 2.252 nm; Day 1: 146.3 ± 1.450 nm; Day 7: 141.6 ± 0.9504 nm. Polydispersity index. Day 0: 0.221 ± 0.006; Day 1: 0.219 ± 0.005; Day 7: 0.245 ± 0.004. Mean droplet size T80/TS. Day 0: 160.7 ± 1.493 nm; Day 1: 159.8 ± 3.460 nm; Day 7: 167.9 ± 1.473 nm. Polydispersity index. Day 0: 0.252 ± 0.012; Day 1: 0.277 ± 0.027; Day 7: 0.231 ± 0.012
Mortality levels of Culex quinquefasciatus after exposure to different concentrations of sucupira oil based nanoemulsion
| Exposure time | Control | 25 mg/L | 100 mg/L | 200 mg/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 0a | 10 ± 0a | 26.67 ± 9.43b | 86.67 ± 4.71c |
| 48 | 6.67 ± 4.71a | 20 ± 0b | 93.33 ± 4.71c | 100 ± 0c |
Data is expressed as mean ± standard deviation
Means in the same line with different superscript indicates statistical significant difference (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Scanning electron micrograph of C. quinquefasciatus larvae. Control (a–c) showing no alteration on head (H), thorax (TH), abdomen segments (AB), siphon (S) and anal papillae (AP). Larvae treated with P. emarginatusnanoemulsion at 250 ppm (d–f) showing alterations on cuticle of abdomen (AB), thorax (TH) and anal papillae (AP)
Fig. 3Light of C. quinquefasciatus larvae. Control (a–c) showing no alteration on head (H), thorax (TH), abdomen segments (AB), siphon (S) and anal papillae (AP). Larvae treated with P. emarginatus nanoemulsion at 250 ppm (d–f) showing alterations on the final abdomen segment (AB) (e)
Fig. 4Acetylcholinesterase activity of enzyme from whole body homogenates of Culex quinquefasciatus larvae
Fig. 5Chemical structures of the terpenoids found on P. emarginatus oleoresin. Sesquiterpene: β-caryophyllene (1). Diterpenes: geranylgeraniol (2) and methyl 6α,7β-dihydroxyvouacapan-17-β-oate (3)
Percentage of viable cells of the green algae Chlorella vulgaris subjected to different sucupira nanoemulsion concentrations (expressed as sucupira oleoresin content)
| Day | Concentration (mg/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 100 | 500 | 1000 | control | |
| 1 | 100 ± 0a | 100 ± 0a | 50 ± 0a | 0 ± 0a | 100 ± 0a |
| 2 | 100 ± 0a | 100 ± 0a | 12 ± 0b | 0 ± 0a | 100 ± 0a |
| 3 | 100 ± 0a | 100 ± 0a | 0 ± 0c | 0 ± 0a | 100 ± 0a |
| 7 | 100 ± 0a | 80 ± 0b | 0 ± 0c | 0 ± 0a | 116 ± 0b |
| 14 | 100 ± 0a | 62.7 ± 3.4c | 0 ± 0c | 0 ± 0a | 116 ± 0b |
| 21 | 80 ± 0b | 47.7 ± 4.0d | 0 ± 0c | 0 ± 0a | 80 ± 0c |
| 28 | 70 ± 0c | 13.3 ± 18.9e | 0 ± 0c | 0 ± 0a | 70 ± 0d |
Results are expressed as mean ± stander deviation. Means in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05)
Composition of oily phase of P. emarginatus nanoemulsions
| Formulation | Surfactants | Concentration (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | T80/S80 | 1560/940 |
| 2 | T20/S80 | 1360/1140 |
| 3 | T80/TS | 1740/760 |
| 4 | T20/TS | 1540/960 |
| 5 | MP600/DP600 | 840/1660 |
| 6 | MP600/DP400 | 1380/1120 |
| 7 | MP400 | 2500 |
| 8 | T20/DP600 | 380/2120 |
| 9 | T20/DP400 | 760/1740 |
| 10 | T80/DP600 | 500/2000 |
| 11 | T80/DP400 | 1540/960 |
P. emarginatus oil concentration was 2500 mg/L. Surfactant mixture final concentration was 2500 mg/L (rHLB = 11). Final mass of each formulation was 50 g. T80 = polysorbate 80. S80 = sorbitan monooleate. T20 = polysorbate 20. TS = sorbitan trioleate. DP400 = polyethyleneglycol 400 dioleate. DP600 = polyethyleneglycol 600 dioleate. MP400 = polyethyleneglycol 400 monooleate. MP600 = polyethyleneglycol 600 monooleate